 |
 |
Posted on 06/13/2015 3:31:58 PM PDT by StevenCrowder
I've pasted it below, but the tweets are images that can't be included. Please go to the link to see whole context, and support more content like this.
"Dear race-baiters already politicizing the Dallas PD shooting,
Here you are. I knew you’d show up. You always do. No matter the incident, no matter how unrelated, no matter who it hurts, you’ll find a way to twist any and all ongoing tragedies into a racially charged, victimization contest.
Good lord, I can’t stand you.
As I write this, the man who launched an assault on the Dallas PD is no more, thanks to our fine men and women in blue. Everyone rejoice! And here’s the thing… everybody is rejoicing. I’ve not seen a single person to be anything short of beaming that this thug got his comeuppance. Except that is, for the #BlackLivesMatter race-baiting hacks and their leaders.
TWEETS FROM LIBERALS (SEEN AT LINK)
What?! Firstly, I’ve never seen the word “n**ger” trending anywhere on twitter. Ever. I’m pretty sure if it ever even came close, it was much more likely due to the likes of Nicki Minaj or Kanye West than the ghost of Robert Byrd. I’m also pretty damn sure that Twitter wouldn’t allow it. So that’s lie #1.
Lie #2, the most important, is that white people aren’t as offended at this as they are when black people attack cops. Again, all evidence points toward the exact opposite.
TWEETS FROM CONSERVATIVES (SEEN AT LINK)
See, we don’t know that about this scumbag yet. How does one know whether someone committed the crime specifically as a means to a political end? Granted, yelling out “Allahu Akbar” that tends to be a giveaway, but if that’s not the case, research and due diligence are required. This thug has barely yet assumed room temperature. People aren’t labeling him a terrorist yet, not because we hate black people, but because we don’t know enough about his motives.
If it turns out that he was some neo-libertarian who rejected the very concept of police authority and that he has a Buffalo Bill basement stocked with nipple-lotion, I’d have zero problems calling him a terrorist. Fair enough?
I also will be outraged or protest exactly zero because the criminal happened to be white. I couldn’t care less. I’m glad he’s dead. Fair enough?
The really sick thing here is that you filthy social justice warrior leftists have ruined the rare unifying moments like these left for our country. In a time where we should all be rallying together, where we should all be supporting those who protect us from harm the most, you seek to divide us the most.
The crazy thing is that in this case, unifying really wouldn’t be all that hard to do! Isn’t that great! Here we find ourselves at a rare juncture where everyone agrees. Here is a time in our country where everyone is glad to see a criminal be served justice, a time where we can all join hands in support, prayer, and become a better, stronger America, a time where… … ah crap, it’s the #BlackLivesMatter people. Well, it was a good ride while it lasted. You race-baiting, politicizing, opportunistic losers.
If Billy Graham;s son was an ATHEIST, do you think that might SWAY his thinking somehow??? HELLO!!
Case in point how children SWAY what their parents do....Sen. Portman of Ohio was a STAUNCH PRO-MARRIAGE voter....his son came out as GAY and now he is PRO-GAY MARRIAGE!!!!!! geesh...it's not rocket science.
So the cops are racist because it took them two hours to kill the white guy?
Obama and his minions have been trying very hard recently to pick apart the 2nd amendment to restrict gun ownership and mental health has been at the top of their list. The timing is uncanny. It really makes you wonder if Satan is on Obama’s payroll (or Soro’s)
Yeah, I really believe parents can have children who go really bad, and have no relationship at all to anything the parent did.
I had really good friends with a 13 year old son who killed the 13 and 6 year old girls who lived next door with a butcher knife.
They were if possible even more devastated than the neighbors whose children were murdered.
And, no, I don’t think they carried some sort of implied guilt for their son’s action.
Though many treated them as if they did or should.
|
|
oh...hello!
Sorry, but you have NO idea of what goes on behind closed doors in a family. The parents did something not right.
Disagree. While you may often be right, kids raised by the best families sometimes go off the rails.
I have no information about the chief or his family.
I just think it is ludicrous to automatically transfer some percentage of the guilt from a child to a parent.
ping
This guy is good. Bookmark his site.
Well thank you, I very much appreciate it. The tweets at the actual link provide better context.
That’s mighty kind of you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.