It is ONLY the Global Warming Leftist narrative being put forth. I am serious... go to the channel and look at the videos that have been posted over the past year.
Ted Cruz... if you are reading this, I need you to see to it that NASA is put back ON MISSION, and that the whole contingent employed at Goddard that is there only to proselytize their fraudulent doomsday Heaven's Gate Global Warming CULT are fired, and their positions eliminated in a permanent budgetary cut.
DEFUND IT!!!
FRiends, please Freep the comments section at the video. Oh, and try not to laugh too hard at the intentional diversity they offer up with the kids in the front row at the lecture... or the size of that one dude's epic Afro.
A simplistic phrase meant to make the low-information types think they understand something that they don't, the same way the phrase "greenhouse gas" is used.
And then you say "the science is settled" as if a simplistic metaphor explains it all.
Out of one side of their mouth, they insist that anything that decreases ozone in the atmosphere is evil.
Out of the other side of their mouth, they insist that anything that releases ozone into the atmosphere is evil.
I’m confused!
Well, not exactly confused. Their purpose is all too obvious.
If we destroy the ozone layer, we fry. If we protect the ozone we add greenhouse gasses and bake. BUT, if we turn all our wealth over the UN, everything will be just fine.
http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Ingles/Crista.html
"The Ozone Hole" was a warm-up for Global Cooling / Warming Climate Change
NASA Budget time Ping!
Time to fund burning holes in the ozone with rockets to find out why it shrinking.
A hole in the ozone over Antarctica in the winter lets UV give us cancer. How much sun hits Antarctica in the winter?
Ozone has health impacts, hence the ozone warnings around cities, ozone in the upper atmosphere reflects UV radiation back into space (albedo effect) so it helps keep the lower atmosphere cooler and blocks UV .
Ozone can be a two edged sword....
AFA CFCs depleting upper ozone, who knows, science is always finding out how much it really did/dopes not know, at least with rational scientists at the controls...
MS in Env Sci (and no, I did not swallow the pills they handed out at the outset of the program- I barely graduated, but earned a 3.95 GPA, but was the only candidate asked to defend my thesis before the department-earned an A minus in Environmental Processes concerning Lead on firing ranges, at age 52).
Of course if NASA is controlling most of the earth-monitoring satellites, then it seems like they are going to be involved in monitoring the Earth.