Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Super Cookies’ Track Your Private Web Browsing — Apple Users Can't Get Rid Of Them
Business Insider ^ | JAN. 8, 2015, 8:30 AM | ROB PRICE

Posted on 01/08/2015 3:04:25 PM PST by Swordmaker

A security flaw means that users of almost every modern web browser can be surreptitiously tracked online without their knowledge, Ars Technica reports, even when they make use of “private browsing.”

Apple users are particularly vulnerable, as their devices do not have a function that lets users delete super cookies from their browsers.

Most websites place what’s called a “cookie” on visitors’ computers, which is used to track them and record their preferences. It’s how websites can remember your password, for example. Like your web-browsing history, cookies are easy to delete. If you use your browser’s “private browsing” mode, they’re never saved in the first place. As a result, advertisers can't track you and other computer users can't go back and see what you looked at.

However, a flaw in a modern web-security feature called “HTTP Strict Transport Security” (HSTS) allows websites to plant “super cookies” that can be used to track web users’ browsing habits even when private browsing is enabled.

Here’s how it works.

Security researcher Sam Greenhalgh writes that HSTS “allows a website to indicate that it should always be accessed using a secure connection that encrypts your communication with the site.” This “flag” is then saved by your web browser, ensuring that any future visits to the website are secure. But websites can also abuse this power by using the feature to store a unique number that can be used to track your web browser.

And because HSTS carries over into private browsing, it means the “super cookie” can be used to track you whether you’re attempting to cover your steps or not.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: apple; computers; macfud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
A few I know to keep. The rest I figure if they are important they will return.

Exactly. There is no harm in periodically wiping out all your cookies. Just login again to your favorite sites and provide your password. Besides, it gets you to remember your password. Too many people rely on the passwords being remembered by "the system" until one day you need to manually enter it but have to scramble to find out where you wrote it down. Another thing you can do is to use multiple browsers, some with private security and allowing nothing to be kept, and delete and reload them as needed. Others can allow cookies and only be used for the trusted sites. Too many people only use a single browser for everything they do. You want security, you need to stay on top of it just like guarding your home.

21 posted on 01/08/2015 4:53:29 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I also noticed on some sites, those that were cookie heavy ,the site loads faster and smoother now that the cookies are gone.


22 posted on 01/08/2015 4:55:39 PM PST by Snowyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Snowyman
I also noticed on some sites, those that were cookie heavy ,the site loads faster and smoother now that the cookies are gone.

I notice that effect after blocking most of the trackers on a site. Folks would be astonished at how many trackers most sites put on your computer. I've seen as many as 20 for a single site.

23 posted on 01/08/2015 5:03:16 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Along with my security programs, I use HTTPS Everywhere, and Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit free, Disconnect, and Adblock Plus.
Where does that put me, in regards to the issue you just described?

Apparently, if you use Internet Explorer, you are OK. . . because it doesn't use the "Super Cookies" at all. . . which may be a good thing, or a bad thing. . . partly because it is not fully compatible with the latest standards.

On the other hand, this whole thing is a "proof of concept" and really NOT an exploit at all. . . but a potential that IF a SECURE website really wanted to track your comings and goings with the Super Cookie, which is not really its designed purpose, they could with special code on their website. According to the article, no one is doing this, but they could. However, if you delete the Super Cookie, you also turn off the ability to use encryption to these sites when you are in Privacy Mode connection. . . and any data being sent is in clear text. . . and you will be susceptible to a man-in-the-middle attack. If you trust the site with your Financial information and investments, you should be OK with them knowing it's you connecting and tracking when you connect.

24 posted on 01/08/2015 6:05:49 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Windflier; Snowyman

http://lifehacker.com/ad-blocking-extension-ghostery-actually-sells-data-to-a-514417864


25 posted on 01/08/2015 6:06:40 PM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
Not unless the bank allows unsecured connections in the first place. What bank does that?

Good question. . . I sincerely hope that there are none out that will. . . but it was a scenario that was brought up in discussion of the pros and cons of the Super Cookie's uses. . . and what could happen if you delete them and why you may not want to. Once you've deleted the cookie, it is gone, even for the next session when you are NOT in Privacy Browsing mode. . . along with the data the bank may need, requiring you to input more information each time you log in.

26 posted on 01/08/2015 6:10:34 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Durus
If you look hard enough, you can find a contrary opinion on just about any tech subject (or product) you can name. No surprise to see that there's an article knocking Ghostery.

That's not to say that every contrary article is a malicious hit piece - just that there are opinions pro and con about everything out there.

From the article at your link:

...you've heard us mention Ghostery. It's a solid privacy tool, but Mashable reports that you should stay away from its opt-in "GhostRank" feature, which sells data on the ads you block to the ad companies themselves.

Basically, their 'GhostRank' is an opt-in feature that I've never enabled, so at the very least I'm not participating in their data gathering campaign. Secondly, what GhostRank does, doesn't directly affect your personal privacy anyway - it simply gathers bulk information on ad blocking, which is then sold to advertisers to help them understand the ad blocking behavior of consumers in general.

No one at Ghostery is selling my private browsing info to anyone.

Here's a response from Adam DeMartino at Ghostery:

"The data we collect in GhostRank doesn't contain any information about the actual ads that were seen by panel members. Rather, we simply report on the technologies that are used to deliver those ads, the performance characteristics of the URLs those technologies were seen on, and if the user blocked that particular technology company. GhostRank can't see the actual ads or anything about the criteria that were used to target them."

I still like Ghostery and think it's a great tool, though I'm aware that there are other tracker blocking tools out there.

27 posted on 01/08/2015 6:27:41 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

So much for activating the porn mode on your browser. ;-)


28 posted on 01/08/2015 6:58:05 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I use Chrome.

HTPPS Everywhere doesn’t give me secure sites when it says htpps?


29 posted on 01/08/2015 10:41:33 PM PST by ansel12 (Civilization, Crusade against the Mohammedan Death Cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I just installed it though I do have Webroot which I thought handles everything....will have to see how this goes...do i just let it do it’s think then?


30 posted on 01/08/2015 10:50:38 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
HTPPS Everywhere doesn’t give me secure sites when it says htpps?

It does. . . but if you delete these Super Cookies, and the go to private browsing, it may mean that HTTPS will not work as advertised. The data sent will be in the clear and in text format instead of encrypted. It depends on how the browser handles it. This is built into the way the web works in HTML5.

Both Chrome and Safari are very HTML5 compliant.

31 posted on 01/08/2015 10:56:45 PM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users contnue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Thanks for that info - many of us do not always grasp the real implications of some of the “techno-babble” and you generally clear it up for us non-nerds.


32 posted on 01/09/2015 3:25:10 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww
...do i just let it do it’s think then?

Ghostery will install a little icon on your browser's toolbar. When you visit a webpage it will show how many trackers are active on it. Just click on the icon and a drop-down menu will open up which displays the names and descriptions of every tracker it's found.

You'll see a little slider switch next to each of these names. If the switch is blue, then the tracker is active. Just click on the slider to move it to red, which turns the tracker off. Do that for each tracker, widget, beacon, advertiser, etc.

You can leave trackers enabled if you feel they're harmless or benign. You can also temporarily enable a tracker if having it turned off keeps you from opening a video, etc.

Hope that helps.

33 posted on 01/09/2015 9:54:22 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Not yet. But properly configured, the 32 bit software works like a charm.And its fast and thorough.


34 posted on 01/09/2015 10:33:30 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Its been vetted world wide for years. No problemo.


35 posted on 01/09/2015 10:34:08 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Its been vetted world wide for years. No problemo.

Okely dokely. Think I'll pass, just the same.

36 posted on 01/09/2015 11:32:29 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

It won’t install on 64 systems, right?


37 posted on 01/09/2015 12:26:52 PM PST by Salamander (No more nights of blood and fire..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

ok I see it...thanks so much...I also have adblock and do not track me.....might be overdone? or will one override the other?

I just am not that computer literate when it comes to programs and such.


38 posted on 01/09/2015 11:18:31 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: caww
I also have adblock and do not track me.....might be overdone? or will one override the other?

I'm more of a driver than a mechanic, so I'm probably not the best qualified person to answer that question.

I do know that similar programs can sometimes get into conflicts with each other. It's why I never use two programs of similar type simultaneously on my computer.

I'd say as long as you don't have Do Not Track Me automatically running in the background, you should be fine.

Just out of curiosity - is Ghostery showing any active trackers on any of the sites you've visited? That would be a good indicator of how well the other program is stopping them (or not stopping them).

39 posted on 01/09/2015 11:50:39 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Oh my gosh...Ghostery is showing one site had 16 trackers on it! Some 4 to 6 others in the teens. Can’t believe how “loaded” sites are with trackers. Seems like everything has trackers on it! WoW!....So it doesn’t appear the other Ad Block is interferring.

Google seems to track on every site in one form or another. Lots of ad types.

Maybe I sould turn the do not track me off???


40 posted on 01/10/2015 11:03:20 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson