The public hears a lot more about autism in recent years compared to earlier decades. Is it more awareness of the condition or actual increases in diagnosis? If the latter, this may explain the increase.
I wonder if they saved big bucks using the fetal cells??
I wonder if this study will be yanked due to political pressure.
Bkmrk.
It’s like a curse.
Bookmarked. Thank you.
Ping...
Ping for later
This is simply mindbogglingly. Mothers for decades have been claiming a connection between vaccines and their child showing signs of autism soon after being vaccinated. All the while there was major, and I mean major governmental push-back and ridicule that mothers were ignorant and simply did not know what they were talking about. Now, proof of monstrous deceit at the expense of the health of young children. How is this ever going to get unwound with thousands of children the victims of this dirty grubby collusion between big pharma and government officials.
PING
Bmp4L8R
Religious fundamentalists try to prove fetal DNA in vaccines causes autism and fail
Another good takedown from a religious site:
There is no plausible way that this could happen. It makes absolutely no sense with what we know to be true about autism. Even though to the layperson it sounds convincing that foreign DNA injected into a developing child could somehow go to the brain and cause autism, there is no credible way that that could actually be the case. Not with the overwhelming evidence that autism begins before birth. This is yet another in a series of plausible sounding untruths about vaccines that are so convincing to the average, intelligent parent just trying to learn more.
Abortion, Autism and Immunization: The Danger of the Plausible Sounding Lie