It's got to be ongoing consent, too. Does he keep asking, you still good, you still good?
Man: this is ANNOYING.
Woman: How'm I supposed to concentrate with this chooch bugging me the whole time?
Woman: Ok, it's working, I think it's working. Yes? Yes! Yes!
Man: (interrupts) can you write that down here?
How romantic....
Original title: California Liberals Pass Bill to Regulate Sex and Show America the Control Freaks They Really Are
Wasn’t there a Saturday Night Live skit on this several years.. or maybe even decades ago?
And yet these same people probably would like to make homo sex mandatory.
Sex between two or three liberals should be a hanging offense for all parties involved.
Hey guys...What a great blackmail tool.....
Q: Hey good lookin’. What’s your sign?
A: Aquarius.
Q: Are you willing to document that?
Just dont have sex in California.
They’re bringing insane college campus rules to the general populace. What a zoo.
Isn’t this the 30 caliber clip/ 30 magazine clip guy?
Yep, that’s him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgpRY8E25Vw
Representing his people well.
I’m sure the California Bar will write up the necessary documents for all parties to execute and have notarized before the sex takes place. It will probably have a check list of sexual acts you can select. Like a menu.
First drive out the porn industry by require a rubber law now this. Has CA become a modern day Mass Bay Colony?
So, if neither party raises the issue verballly, which one gets charged? Or do the both get charged?
I find this amusing.
All this could be avoided by simply avoiding the sin of fornication?
By the way this only applies to straight couples.
Queers can do anything they want, anywhere they want, any time they want, with or without consent.
If you're queer and black, you can pretty much control the world.
Yes, I’m sure the perusers of the homo meat market in San Francisco will abide by this to the “T”.
It would still be non-binding agreement.
In another article, a college handbook says that breaking up with a girl because she won’t have sex is an act of coercion.
She could just claim that she signed the agreement under duress because the relationship would end.
Interesting how Leftists were successful in overthrowing the in loco parentis responsibilities of colleges/universities. Now one has co-ed dorm rooms, no curfews, free flowing alcohol, and plenty of sex; now there is no such thing as a ole fashion date. Of course, for some reason the Left failed to recognize that sometimes nasty things happen in the environment or with no rules messages get confused. Now instead of perhaps reimposing some rules we get this legalized remedy and star chamber on campus judicial proceedings. This is the story of the Left. They push liberation and throwing out tradition then when the inevitable bad stuff happens they start imposing the power of the state as a remedy.
sexpolice, bigbrother, lavendermafia, antibreeder
Okay, so...let’s just say that a young man and young woman meet in club one Saturday night after consuming several adult liquid beverages and become intoxicated — And let’s say for the sake of argument that they go back to her place — Break out the forms and our two drunks sign them and do the deed.
Now what? Boinking under the influence...who will be at fault.
If women are frustrated about men not being men and “going after it” now, what in the hell do they think this is going to do to men when this takes effect.
I’m assuming that we will only encourage average men to sit at home on the weekend playing x-box, smoking weed, drinking beer, watching porn/wacking off, eating pizza, and avoiding women at all costs.
The men that are already dogs will continue to do what they do because that is what they do...Soooooooo, net result, women become more frustrated with the lack of men.
What is the net positive for young men and women?