Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

23 Books You Didn't Read In High School But Actually Should
BuzzFeed ^ | July 5, 2013 | Spencer Althouse

Posted on 05/30/2014 12:34:14 PM PDT by EveningStar

You probably SparkNoted these books before, but now's your chance to read them.

(Excerpt) Read more at buzzfeed.com ...


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Education
KEYWORDS: books; literature
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: gr8eman

Catch 22 is an operating manual for today’s government.


21 posted on 05/30/2014 12:50:13 PM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

What about Orwell’s ‘1984’?

Oh wait. Forgot. We’re living that one.


22 posted on 05/30/2014 12:50:22 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I was assigned most of those in high school, and some of them are good reading. The list is biased towards the new stuff. Shakespeare and Dickens don’t make the list?

They included two from Orwell and “Brave New World” (Huxley’s only decent book), so that helps.

However, two I did read, “The Bell Jar” and “Waiting for Godot” promote despair and nihilism, respectively.

I hope Plath’s poetry is better than her awful book. In “The Bell Jar”, Plath stated that during her depression she liked to pick up those little saddle-stitched (stapled) pocket books at the grocery store check-out (often of the self-help variety). If you followed her advice, you’d likely have a better read than “The Bell Jar”.

“Waiting for Godot” is a great high school book because you can figure out the whole thing if you haven’t read it yet in about 30 seconds of class discussion. Absurdism is best written by someone who isn’t so self-indulgent as a writer.
Recommended only for those who want to pick up a 60s vibe. It is already quite dated even as Dickens enjoys a renaissance.


23 posted on 05/30/2014 12:51:41 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("I'm a Contra" -- President Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

Really? I’d say 1984 is the new standard.


24 posted on 05/30/2014 12:51:44 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Ooops.

1984 is # 8 on the list.


25 posted on 05/30/2014 12:52:59 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Read all by age 22 except for Uncle Tom’s Cabin, Mrs Dalloway, As I lay Dying (teacher slapped a Faulkner paperback out of my hand and said Don’t ever bring that trash near me!), and Their Eyes Were Watching God.

Don’t I get a prize for participating?

R2z


26 posted on 05/30/2014 12:53:16 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Not Catcher in the Rye again!


27 posted on 05/30/2014 12:53:39 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I had to suffer through it, and with hindsight I realize the teachers thought it was great, for whatever reason! Those books have no business in a school, IMO! We also did read Orwell, Huxley, etc...great stuff...but I am convinced that those crap books were just a money making scheme between the publishers and the school unions. Seriously...The Good Earth? I had to endure that crap for a whole semester. This dumb teacher woman I had actually thought that has some redeeming value.


28 posted on 05/30/2014 12:55:43 PM PDT by gr8eman (A good rant should have the word "crap" in it at least 4 times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I’ve read 13 from that list.


29 posted on 05/30/2014 12:55:46 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
and Lolita by Nobokov.

It certainly would have helped for me to understand what the hell Sting was singing about in "Don't Stand So Close to Me."

30 posted on 05/30/2014 12:56:00 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I read 14 of those in high school.


31 posted on 05/30/2014 12:56:11 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

Unfathomable how much precious life is wasted on that stupid book! there should be a law!


32 posted on 05/30/2014 12:57:52 PM PDT by gr8eman (A good rant should have the word "crap" in it at least 4 times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I read all but two of these in high school or college. I don’t think this list is trying to be the only books to read; I certainly read a number of Shakespearean plays/poetry, and my high school aged son is reading them, now. Some of these books were enjoyable, but many were not.


33 posted on 05/30/2014 12:58:27 PM PDT by Rutabega (If you don't want me in your personal affairs, don't stick your hand out for my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; gr8eman
The three tomes you noted as liberal-psychotic were part of high school English curriculum in the 80s. Says a lot, doesn’t it?

Part of my HS curriculum and I graduated in 78 -- from Catholic school.

34 posted on 05/30/2014 12:58:33 PM PDT by Gabz (Democrats for Voldemort.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman

Vonnegut was/is a Marxist. Nothing more.

Arthur Miller clearly hated capitalism and resented the blacklist(s) so he thought he’d have an elitist pop at the working class.

Catcher is an entertaining tale as far as it goes and somewhat unique in the age/perspective of the narrator but it’s also very much of its age and badly dated.

Beowulf is in an archaic form of our language. Whoopee. A 1927 Ford is archaic but I don’t want to drive one every day. Set archetype for heroic saga etc. etc. It’s still tedious.

Night - one of those testimonies that deserves to be heard but Wiesel was highly annoying in subsequent interviews and appearances.

Gatsby - overhyped. Another not-so-veiled attack on capitalism with self-aggrandizement of academics thrown in. Can we assume Fitzgerald thought the Depression was an improvement over the Roaring 20s?

Mockingbird - finally, a solid story and characters. However, most kids never have a chance to read it and instead are beat over the head with the book in order to fully grasp its ‘message.’ Lefties can’t resist the dignified black/white trash cliches.


35 posted on 05/30/2014 12:58:34 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The End)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
... a stupid book, as was of Mice and Men.

Whoa there Lenny! You need to repeat the 11th grade! Steinbeck book stupid!? Stop, read, repeat. (Not that thick a paperback either.)
36 posted on 05/30/2014 12:58:50 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

How things have changed. We read 4, 8, 12, & 15 in high school. Advanced Placement (what they call it now. It was “Enriched” when I was in school) read 1 & 18. at least IIRC & probably 2, 17, & 20 also.

I read Slaughterhouse Five (& other Vonnegut novels) in high school & saw the movie several times to glean as much as I could from it, & Frankenstein because my senior term paper in english was on Percy Bysshe Shelley. We read Godot (which I detested) & Beowulf in college.

One book that (imho) didn’t make the list (that we read in high school) was Cry,
The Beloved Country. I had used Cliff’s Notes in school, but my co-worker, a couple of years later, was reading it & liked it, so I finally read it. It was really, really good. Probably my first “marathon” read.


37 posted on 05/30/2014 12:58:59 PM PDT by KGeorge (Till we're together again, Gypsy girl. May 28, 1998- June 3, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

It’s in the list.


38 posted on 05/30/2014 12:59:01 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Well, I’ve read every one of them, except “My Eyes were Watching God.” They were all certainly significant books, and worth reading.

But if I had to recommend a list of books that probably aren’t read in school any longer, I’d start first with Homer, Virgil, Sophocles, Dante, Chaucer, Milton, Shakespeare, Dostoevsky, Racine, Goethe, and that sort of thing.

And Jane Austen.


39 posted on 05/30/2014 12:59:36 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Had to read in the late 60’s too


40 posted on 05/30/2014 12:59:47 PM PDT by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson