Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Gates: People Don't Realize How Many Jobs Will Soon Be Replaced By Software Bots
Business Insider ^ | 03/14/2014 | Julie Bort

Posted on 03/14/2014 11:30:01 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Big changes are coming to the labor market that people and governments aren't prepared for, Bill Gates believes.

Speaking at Washington, D.C., economic think tank The American Enterprise Institute on Thursday, Gates said that within 20 years, a lot of jobs will go away, replaced by software automation ("bots" in tech slang, though Gates used the term "software substitution").

This is what he said:

"Software substitution, whether it's for drivers or waiters or nurses … it's progressing. ...  Technology over time will reduce demand for jobs, particularly at the lower end of skill set. ...  20 years from now, labor demand for lots of skill sets will be substantially lower. I don’t think people have that in their mental model."

He's not the only one predicting this gloomy scenario for workers. In January, the Economist ran a big profile naming over a dozen jobs sure to be taken over by robots in the next 20 years, including telemarketers, accountants and retail workers.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Society
KEYWORDS: ai; google; jobs; nsadatacollection; robots; software; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: usconservative

The touch screen ordering has been around for over a decade. It’s more accurate and can use different languages. It only required a person to make the sandwich, and we are at the point where that can now be done when it becomes economically feasible. And the democrats are hastening that time by raising the human cost in a process, thereby cutting jobs for low skilled workers.


21 posted on 03/14/2014 12:02:40 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 11th Commandment
"Gates believes that the tax codes are going to need to change to encourage companies to hire employees, including, perhaps, eliminating income and payroll taxes altogether."

He may be right. The income tax tends to be more stable than a consumption tax in an economic downturn. But income taxes discourage specialization. When it costs you 2x what you make to hire someone else, then you do it yourself.

Hence the growth of Home Depot and Lowes.

22 posted on 03/14/2014 12:02:47 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Look at what IBM is doing with Watson. People will be surprised that it isn’t just lower skill labor that can get automated, knowledge workers are threatened as well.


23 posted on 03/14/2014 12:03:24 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cherry
I'd like to know what robot is going to wipr your ugly little butt when you're just another demented peasant?

Robots for that very thing are being researched today.

24 posted on 03/14/2014 12:04:18 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Software substitution, whether it's for drivers or waiters or nurses … it's progressing. ... Technology over time will reduce demand for jobs, particularly at the lower end of skill set. ... 20 years from now, labor demand for lots of skill sets will be substantially lower. I don’t think people have that in their mental model."

"I am not afraid of Howard. There's just no credible threat!"

25 posted on 03/14/2014 12:05:54 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is a trend that begun with the industrial revolution.

I can list dozen of jobs that no longer exist because of automation (just from within my life time).

Businesses make financial decisions. They do not care if they employe a machine or a person. As long as they can get good quality work for low cost. If a person can do it, fine, if a machine can do it, that is also fine.

As someone else posted, government rules and regulations are making people more expense and trouble to hire and keep.

For individual businesses it makes sense to cut the number of real people and replace them with machines, but what will happen when the majority of people do not have a job or an income (other than welfare which is just a wealth transfer from those that are still working to those that are not)?

It is almost impossible to predict the future, but one thing can be predicted. No trend remains forever. Something will occur to change the way things are going.


26 posted on 03/14/2014 12:08:45 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I do not doubt that our climate changes. I only doubt that anything man does has any effect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Technology cant possibly compare with this administration over killing jobs.


27 posted on 03/14/2014 12:13:09 PM PDT by StevieRay20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
the elites have decided they won't need us

While we're still abundant and generating revenue, they look on the non-elite as a cash crop to be exploited for more power and money. That's fine by them. What they don't want is those of us in the bottom 98% (or so) sharing their physical space. That is the problem with there being so many of us.

28 posted on 03/14/2014 12:13:11 PM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Every Windows machine I’ve had in the last 20 years gets slugged up and won’t work at the 2 year point. Unless the world is operating on reliable RTOS’, none of this will work. Of course, reliable RTOS’ are cheap now, so it might come to pass if MS gets out of the way.


29 posted on 03/14/2014 12:15:30 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Not to worry — a $10/hour or $15/hour minimum wage will bring all those wait-staff jobs back.


30 posted on 03/14/2014 12:17:01 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah Bill. When you develop a dissecting aneurism, stay home with your bot. Stay the hell outta my ER.


31 posted on 03/14/2014 12:17:33 PM PDT by 60Gunner (Fight with your head high, or grovel with your head low.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I said a long time ago that we were “technologing” ourselves out of work. When I started my post-Army retirement civilian job, I was covering two attorneys in a law firm. I was working as hard as I could to stay up with them. By the time I retired out in 2007, 14 years later, I was covering FIVE attorneys. Because of computers and such the attorneys were now doing work that I used to do. The more it gets that way, the fewer legal assistant jobs there will be. Our firm had let several jobs go unhired when people left and those attorneys just paired out to other LA’s to cover. It is only going to get worse. Just wait till McDonalds has technology cooking the burgers, answering the drive thru and the robut handing you your order after you swiped your One World Government Credit Card to pay for the order.


32 posted on 03/14/2014 12:17:51 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (MARANATHA, MARANATHA, Come quickly LORD Jesus!!! Father send thy Son!! Its Time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

*Snort!* Well played!


33 posted on 03/14/2014 12:21:13 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ve wondered how many more years before we see a pilotless remote-controlled passenger jet. Depending on what happened to Flight 370, it might be sooner rather than later.


34 posted on 03/14/2014 12:23:17 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Gates if you created the bots then we will need twice and many people to remove the bugs from them!!!


35 posted on 03/14/2014 12:23:51 PM PDT by Morgana (Wagglebee please come home we miss you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

and now, thanks to Obama, their operators will get overtime!


36 posted on 03/14/2014 12:24:50 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grania

They want us to save the planet for THEIR children.

Abortuaries are good enough for our children.


37 posted on 03/14/2014 12:29:56 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
The touch screen ordering has been around for over a decade

I did some independent consulting for several dinner theaters back in the late 80's/early 90's and they were using touch screens with wifi back then. The waiters/waitress' used thhem to place orders at tableside, the order would print in the kitchen where it would be filled by kitchen staff who then paged the waiter/waitress back to the kitchen via the touch screen device when the order was ready.

I helped implement several of those systems, IIRC the company name of the vended software and hardware solution was Squirrel Systems. It's been over 20 years so I may not remember the vendor's name correctly.

In my Chili's restaurant reference above, that was the first time I'd seen a device at tableside on each table with customers placing their own orders. (They were wif iPads btw with customized application software.)

38 posted on 03/14/2014 12:32:40 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

I’ve believed for a long time that the worlds elites do expect to reach a point where they can live nicely with automation. It may take another 10+ years.

Putting on my tinfoil hat, I think that at that point they will view the “surplus” 6-7 billion people on earth as expendable. Some nasty engineered bug, held in deep storage, will do the trick.


39 posted on 03/14/2014 12:35:58 PM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
I’ve wondered how many more years before we see a pilotless remote-controlled passenger jet. Depending on what happened to Flight 370, it might be sooner rather than later.

They're certainly trying... just failing way too often on the landings. Humans are still the better option... for now.

40 posted on 03/14/2014 12:36:40 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson