Posted on 03/04/2014 9:13:02 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The larger the company, the greater its capacity for taking risks. While pouring millions of dollars into market research and advertising campaigns can lead to tremendous successes, such ventures can also be a formula for the most miserable failures.
To identify some of the worst product flops of all time, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed products introduced after 1950 by Americas largest companies. To make the list, the company needed to make the Fortune 500 the year the product was released.
Companies often launch new products in response to a competitors successful idea. But such products fail if they cannot measure up to the competition or capture consumers attention. Microsofts Zune was developed in response to successful Apple products. The Zune was harshly reviewed for technical problems consumers had with the device. It also lacked an easy-to-use music store.
Click here to see the worst product flops of all time
Other experiments, such as the McDonalds Arch Deluxe and Pepsi Crystal, were reinventions of a company’s staple. While there were good reasons to introduce these new products, consumers rejected them almost immediately.
In some cases, companies simply offered a bad product. Frito-Lay’s WOW! chips, for example, were very popular at first but ended up causing such unpleasant gastrointestinal problems that the product became completely unsalvageable.
Some products may have just been ahead of their time. The Newton MessagePad was perhaps the first tablet marketed to consumers, introducing in the early 1990s an idea that became very popular only a decade and a half later. However, Apple had trouble convincing consumers of the value of mobile computing at the time.
These are the worst product flops of all time.
10. Arch Deluxe
> Company: McDonalds
> Year released: 1996
> Revenue yr. released: $9.8 billion
The Arch Deluxe was a quarter-pound burger McDonald’s released in 1996. The Arch Deluxe came with lettuce, onions, tomatoes, ketchup, and a mayonnaise-dijon mustard sauce on a potato bread roll. McDonald’s spent $100 million advertising the burger specifically to adults, considerably more than it had on its other burgers. Instead of showing satisfied adults, billboards and TV ads depicted children disgusted with the new burger. It appears that most adults, however, were not convinced they should want the burger simply because kids didn’t want it. The Arch Deluxe was also more expensive. It cost at least $2.29, compared with the Big Mac, which cost just $1.90 at the time. The burgers failure was so monumental that McDonalds completely reversed its strategy of introducing pricier items. In 1997, the company released a 55 cent Big Mac and tried other dramatic price cuts.
9. The Newton MessagePad
> Company: Apple
> Year released: 1993
> Revenue yr. released: $6.3 billion
Apple’s Newton MessagePad was one of the first products to offer basic computing functions in a handheld device. Its technology was revolutionary for its time. The Newton was met with excitement and favorable reviews, noting its futuristic look and processing power. But the Newton failed to catch on, and was eventually discontinued in 1998. Steve Capps, head of product development at the time, explained that the Newtons handwriting feature doomed the product. Handwriting recognition was meant to be the main selling point, but it didnt work properly during the initial release. The device was also ridiculed in the news for essentially replacing an inexpensive paper notebook with a $700 computer.
ALSO READ: Ten Retailers With the Worst Costumer Service
8. Zune
> Company: Microsoft
> Year released: 2006
> Revenue yr. released: $39.8 billion
Both the Zune and its upgraded sequel the Zune HD ultimately failed to compete with Apples already well-established iPod brand. Even without various performance issues plaguing the device — at the beginning of 2009, thousands of Zunes froze due to software glitches — the Zune would have had difficulty competing with the iPod. Shortly before its release, Wired Magazine argued that Microsofts PlayForSure digital music format would be clumsy due to unnecessary and poorly implemented security measures. There was also a sentiment among reviewers that the Zune could never be as cool as the iPod. With its initial $9 million ad campaign, according to NPD, Microsoft was able to capture only 10.8% of the relevant segment, versus Apples intimidating 86.1% market share as of 2006. After dismal results, Microsoft would nearly double its advertising investment, but without success. As a result, Microsoft’s Entertainment and Devices division lost $1.3 billion in 2006, and then a further $1.9 billion in 2007. Today, Microsoft has virtually abandoned the Zune MP3 player, as well as the Zune brand.
7. New Coke
> Company: Coca-Cola
> Year released: 1985
> Revenue yr. released: $7.4 billion
For developers at Coca-Cola, reformulating the original Coke recipe may have made sense. In the early 1980s, the company’s market share was slipping and enthusiasm for the cola segment in general was also on the decline. Cokes main competitor, Pepsi, had also successfully changed its formula multiple times to gain market share. In an effort to compete, Coca-Cola made its first recipe change to the original flavor in 99 years. The public backlash was nearly instantaneous. Consumers did not object to the new flavor so much as to the fact that the classic version was no longer available. According to the companys website, protest groups popped up around the country. Seventy seven days later the company brought back the original Coke with the new name, Coca-Cola Classic. Despite the fact that the company lost more than $30 million in the new formulas concentrate, and spent over $4 million on taste testing, the flop may have actually enhanced brand recognition and ultimately paid off in the long run. While soda sales have recently declined in the U.S., Coke led the carbonated beverage segment with a 42% market share as of 2012, according to Beverage Digest.
ALSO READ: The 10 Weirdest Things Thieves Stealspan>
6. WOW! chips
> Company: PepsiCo
> Year released: 1998
> Revenue yr. released: $11.5 billion
PepsiCo’s subsidiary Frito-Lay released WOW! chips in an effort to offer healthier and less fattening junk food. By using olestra, a fat substitute designed by Procter & Gamble, WOW! chips contained significantly less fat and calories. Initially, sales were exceptional, reaching $347 million in 1998 and making WOW! the best-selling potato chip brand that year. But olestra also had an unpleasant effect on the body. Diarrhea, incontinence, and cramping, were among the most common grievances, with some cases requiring hospitalization. PepsiCo dedicated a $35 million advertising budget to counteract negative opinion, but sales still declined dramatically in 1999 and 2000. Frito-Lay finally responded by renaming WOW! chips light in 2004. The company also avoided calling attention to its continued use of olestra. The absence of a warning label prompted a number of lawsuits. According to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, olestras approval for consumption was one of the FDAs biggest blunders of all time.
5. Coors Rocky Mountain Sparkling Water
> Company: Adolph Coors Company
> Year released: 1990
> Revenue yr. released: $1.8 billion
Coors has advertised its beer as “cold brewed with pure rocky mountain spring water for decades. Apparently, this water has been used to brew Coors beer since 1873. In response to a trend towards moderate alcohol consumption and significant growth in the bottled water segment, the company decided to sell spring water — its first nonalcoholic beverage since Prohibition. While the decision benefited from the companys existing bottling logistics and distribution, the Coors brand didnt help sell bottled water. Coors Rocky Mountain Sparkling Water used a similar name and label to that of Coors beer, which may have confused and even spooked consumers. Anheuser-Busch, maker of Budweiser, also began criticizing Coors around that time for attributing superior quality to its mountain spring water, which Anheuser-Busch claimed was cut with water from Virginia. Coors cancelled its bottled water trademark in 1997.
ALSO READ: Cars So Hot They Are Out of Stock
4. Clairol Touch of Yogurt Shampoo
> Company: Procter & Gamble
> Year released: 1979
> Revenue yr. released: $8.1 billion
Yogurt and other cultured dairy products may actually be beneficial for your hair. Like many companies, P&G began emphasizing the natural ingredients in its products in the 1970s to answer the overall “back to nature” movement of the time. It was common for many shampoos to contain a variety of natural ingredients, including honey, various herbs, and fruits. When Clairol, a subsidiary of P&G, released its Touch of Yogurt Shampoo in 1979, however, customers did not take to associating dairy with a hair product. The product was also confusing to some. There were a number of cases of people mistakenly eating it and getting sick as a result. Surprisingly, Touch of Yogurt was not Clairols first failed foray into milk-based hair products — three years earlier it had attempted to market a shampoo called the Look of Buttermilk. Both sold poorly and are no longer available in the U.S.
3. Crystal Pepsi
> Company: PepsiCo
> Year released: 1992
> Revenue yr. released: $19.8 billion
In 1992, PepsiCo attempted to enter the then-flourishing new-age beverages market with its clear, caffeine-free Crystal Pepsi. The company promoted the product as a healthy and pure diet beverage. Its $40 million advertising campaign included permission to use Van Halens hit song Right Now in TV advertisements. Market tests at the time gave Crystal Pepsi such a positive outlook that Coca-Cola released Tab Clear to compete with it. While sales over the first year were a strong $470 million, many of the purchases were likely due to curiosity. Not only were consumers not convinced by Pepsis health angle, but many cola-drinkers expected a darker beverage. Also hurting Crystal Pepsi’s popularity: to many consumers it tasted just like original Pepsi.
ALSO READ: The Most Innovative Companies in the World
2. TouchPad
> Company: Hewlett Packard
> Year released: 2011
> Revenue yr. released: $126.0 billion
Introduced in July 2011, the TouchPad was Hewlett Packards attempt to compete with Apples iPad. With powerful video capability and impressive processing speeds, the TouchPad was widely anticipated to be among the only products that could give Apple a run for its money. Despite large scale press events and promotions, the HP TouchPad was a colossal failure and was discontinued almost immediately. As a result of the TouchPads failure, the company wrote off $885 million in assets and incurred an additional $755 million in costs to wind down its webOS operations, ending all work on the TouchPads failed operating system. Since then, HP has continued to struggle to maintain its edge in the PC market. The once-dominant PC company is in the midst of a multi-year turnaround plan. While the plan may have recently begun to bear fruit, investors remain cautious.
1. Edsel
> Company: Ford
> Year released: 1957
> Revenue yr. released: $4.6 billion
Released on E-Day — with E standing for experimental — the Edsel was Fords attempt to offer a higher-end, mid-sized vehicle for consumers looking to upgrade. The car was named after Edsel B. Ford, the companys former president and Henry Fords only son, who died in 1943. The Edsel cost Ford at least $350 million, which in todays dollars is equal to roughly $2.9 billion. Ford promoted the car aggressively with expensive teaser ads, which may have gone too far in raising consumer expectations. A Teletouch pushbutton transmission and the Edsels electronic controls in particular were said to be revolutionary. Unfortunately, the new features were unreliable. The car was also quite expensive, ranging from $2,500 for the Edsel Pacer 4-door sedan to $3,766 for the 2-door convertible. This may have been difficult during a steep economic downturn — sales were down in 1957 for many other car companies, including Buick, Mercury, Dodge, and Pontiac. After four model years Ford stopped producing the Edsel.
That goes away with Age.
Still, anything with a warning: “May cause anal leakage” is not on my list of things to eat.
It was a failure for Motorola, but the Government got to pick it up on the cheap. It’s also nice for making a phone call on my brothers Boston Whaler 15 miles out to sea.
My wife wants me to throw it out but I hid it... :)
I've been keeping an eye out for ones for sale - this one has taken much abuse.
How about Pepsi Free? First time I heard it was on the original `Back to the Future` flick.
I recall a spoof advertisement for a cover to make your iPod look like a Zune --ensuring nobody would steal it.
I ain’t exactly young. :-)
Big Mac .55 cents in 1996. Now $4.69 We are told there is no inflation!!!
Zune: Sheldon likes it......
TouchPad: The CEO who had been fired from another company after costing it over $2 billion also was fired from HP but only after he tried to discontinue all computer manufacturing as he wanted to be like IBM and go into consulting.
10. Beta max
9. Laser Disc Movies
8. 12bit Mini Disc machines
7. 8-track Tapes
6. palm pilots
5. Wide screen projection TV
4. Quadraphonic Sound
3. Cinerama
2. Pagers
1. The Volkswagen “THING”
Just from personal observation...YMMV.
Where did you buy Big Macs for less than one cent?
I always wondered if it was the only way they could change the formula of their original Coke. Taking it off the market for several months and replacing it with that horrible New Coke allowed them to change the types of sugar used.
When Coke Classic came back it never tasted the same. To get the original flavor we buy the stuff made in Mexico.
I am poor in math and punctuation. It was 55 cents.
Forget you ever saw the DOT!
What dot? :-)
As a commercial venture, the original Iridium system failed. That led to bankruptcy and the merger cited in the article. If you notice a good bit of the business in the re-born Iridium is government-subsidized (ie. defense & research).
i have my zune for four years now, i love it, it works great and sounds wonderful.....ive got 400 plus tunes on it, including some books, seminars, etc...nvr had a lick of trouble with it.
Mark
No mention of McRibs? That has to be the WORST “food” ever served up by McDonalds. Not even real ribs. Oh, and their oatmeal breakfast has to be a close second in terms of lousy food. BTW, do they still sell those oatmeals?
Actually, MCA was a pretty good design, but what killed it was primarily IBM's ridiculous licensing fees, which really limited the availability of 3rd party adapters, though the incompatibility with legacy, ISA adapters didn't help. In fact, 1 of the 2 companies that actually licensed and sold computers equipped with the MCA bus produced a "dual bus" server, featuring both ISA and MCA busses (I believe this was before EISA).
For bonus points, what were those 2 companies that actually produced and sold MCA computers, besides IBM?
Mark
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.