To: Innovative
They couldn’t give the baby to another zoo?
4 posted on
02/10/2014 5:20:16 PM PST by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy; EinNYC
See post 57 on the other thread, EinNYC’s post:
“A British zoo offered to take him. People raised $680,000 to buy him. But this crap zoo insisted on killing this poor animal who had grown to trust them, had never known anything but a kind hand from themso they could publicly dissect him for pseudoscientific reasons and then feed him to lions? This zoo should be closed for cruelty to animals.”
6 posted on
02/10/2014 5:23:11 PM PST by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: A CA Guy
The genes of that giraffe were already common in the European gene pool.
9 posted on
02/10/2014 5:31:24 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: A CA Guy
The zoo leadership would rather kill it than sell it to another accredited zoo that had a space for it.
14 posted on
02/10/2014 5:38:19 PM PST by
PAR35
To: A CA Guy
34 posted on
02/10/2014 6:03:11 PM PST by
Figment
To: A CA Guy
That would require a functioning intellect.
63 posted on
02/10/2014 6:39:35 PM PST by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson