Posted on 01/15/2014 4:26:24 PM PST by Kevmo
Title shortened
BlackLight Power, Inc. Announces the Game Changing Achievement of the Generation of Millions of Watts of Power from the Conversion of Water Fuel to a New Form of Hydrogen
Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Email More
BusinessWire · Jan. 14, 2014 | Last Updated: Jan. 14, 2014 5:01 AM ET
BlackLight Power, Inc. (BLP) today announced that it has produced millions of watts of power with its breakthrough Solid Fuel-Catalyst-Induced-Hydrino-Transition (SF-CIHT) patent pending technology in its laboratories.
Using a proprietary water-based solid fuel confined by two electrodes of a SF-CIHT cell, and applying a current of 12,000 amps through the fuel, water ignites into an extraordinary flash of power. The fuel can be continuously fed into the electrodes to continuously output power. BlackLight has produced millions of watts of power in a volume that is one ten thousandths of a liter corresponding to a power density of over an astonishing 10 billion watts per liter. As a comparison, a liter of BlackLight power source can output as much power as a central power generation plant exceeding the entire power of the four former reactors of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, the site of one of the worst nuclear disasters in history.
Our safe, non-polluting power-producing system catalytically converts the hydrogen of the H2O-based solid fuel into a non-polluting product, lower-energy state hydrogen called Hydrino, by allowing the electrons to fall to smaller radii around the nucleus. The energy release of H2O fuel, freely available in the humidity in the air, is one hundred times that of an equivalent amount of high-octane gasoline. The power is in the form of plasma, a supersonic expanding gaseous ionized physical state of the fuel comprising essentially positive ions and free electrons that can be converted directly to electricity using highly efficient magnetohydrodynamic converters. Simply replacing the consumed H2O regenerates the fuel. Using readily-available components, BlackLight has developed a system engineering design of an electric generator that is closed except for the addition of H2O fuel and generates ten million watts of electricity, enough to power ten thousand homes. Remarkably, the device is less than a cubic foot in volume. To protect its innovations and inventions, multiple worldwide patent applications have been filed on BlackLights proprietary technology.
This breakthrough transformational power technology can be witnessed in a live demonstration hosted by BlackLight of on January 28th at 11 AM. Details and updates will be posted at the company website (http://www.blacklightpower.com/). Those interested in attending can contact BlackLight to preregister for this limited availability event.
Applications and markets for the SF-CIHT cell extend across the global power spectrum, including thermal, stationary electrical power, motive, and defense. Given the independence from existing infrastructure, grid in the case of electricity and fuels in the case of motive power, the SF-CIHT power source is a further game changer for all forms of transportation: automobile, freight trucks, rail, marine, aviation, and aerospace in that the power density is one million times that of the engine of a Formula One racer, and ten million times that of a jet engine. The SF-CIHT cell uses cheap, abundant, nontoxic, commodity chemicals, with no apparent long-term supply issues that might preclude commercial, high volume manufacturing. The projected cost of the SF-CIHT cell is between $10 and $100/kW compared to over one hundred times that for conventional power sources of electricity.
BlackLights previously reported pioneering solid fuels and CIHT electrochemical cell use the same catalyst as the newly invented SF-CIHT cells, and they served as a model for Dr. Mills to invent the breakthrough plasma producing SF-CIHT cell. These background technologies have been validated by industry. BlackLights results of multiples of the maximum theoretical energy release for representative solid fuels was replicated at Perkin Elmers Field Application Laboratory at their facility using their commercial instrument. Moreover, our advanced CIHT electrochemical cell was independently replicated offsite as well.
We at The ENSER Corporation have performed about thirty tests at our premises using BLPs CIHT electrochemical cells of the type that were tested and reported by BLP in the Spring of 2012, and achieved the three specified goals, said Dr. Ethirajulu Dayalan, Engineering Fellow, of The ENSER Corporation. We independently validated BlackLights results offsite by an unrelated highly qualified third party. We confirmed that hydrino was the product of any excess electricity observed by three analytical tests on the cell products, and determined that BlackLight Power had achieved fifty times higher power density with stabilization of the electrodes from corrosion. Dr. Terry Copeland, who managed product development for several electrochemical and energy companies including DuPont Company and Duracell added, Dr. James Pugh (then Director of Technology at ENSER) and Dr. Ethirajulu Dayalan participated with me in the independent tests of CIHT cells at The ENSER Corporations Pinellas Park facility in Florida starting on November 28, 2012. We fabricated and tested CIHT cells capable of continuously producing net electrical output that confirmed the fifty-fold stable power density increase and hydrino as the product.
The disclosure of one of BlackLights patent application that was recently-filed worldwide, its 10 MW electric SF-CIHT cell system engineering design and simulation, high-speed video of millions of watts of supersonically expanding SF-CIHT cell plasma, The ENSER Corporation and Dr. Terry Copeland validation reports on the prior generation CIHT electrochemical cells, and the Perkin Elmer report on solid fuels are publicly available on BlackLights webpage (http://www.blacklightpower.com/). Technical papers by BlackLight providing the experimental tests of plasma to electric conversion, results of excess energy production from solid fuels, results of continuous electricity production at fifty times higher power density than prior generation CIHT electrochemical cells, and the detailed chemistry and identification of Hydrinos by ten analytical methods that laboratories can follow and replicate are given at http://www.blacklightpower.com/.
About BlackLight Power
BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a new primary energy source applicable to essentially all power applications such as thermal, electrical, automotive, trucking, rail, marine, aviation, aerospace, and defense. The BlackLight Process, the power source, is the process of releasing the latent energy of the hydrogen atom by forming Hydrinos. The SF-CIHT cell was invented by Dr. Mills to release this energy directly as electricity from water as the only source of fuel.
For more information, please visit http://www.blacklightpower.com/
Glossary:
BlackLight Process: A novel chemical process invented by Dr. Mills causing the latent energy stored in the hydrogen atom to be released as a new primary energy source.
Hydrino: Hydrinos are a new form of hydrogen theoretically predicted by Dr. Mills and produced and characterized by BLP. Hydrinos are produced during the BlackLight Process as energy is released from the hydrogen atom as the electron transitions to a lower-energy state resulting in a smaller radius hydrogen atom. The identity of the dark matter of the universe as Hydrinos is supported by BlackLights spectroscopic and analytical results as well as astrophysical observations.
SF-CIHT Cell: Each SF-CIHT cell comprises two electrodes that confine a highly electrically conducive H2O-based solid fuel that serves as a source of reactants to form Hydrinos. A low-voltage, very high current (about one thousand times that of household currents) ignites the water to form hydrinos and cause a burst of plasma power of millions of watts that can be directly converted to electricity using proven plasma to electric power conversion technology such as a magnetohydrodynamic converter.
Magnetohydrodynamic Converter: An electrical generator that uses no moving parts. It comprises a magnet as in a conventional generator, but the conductor that moves in this case is the flowing plasma that produces a voltage at a pair of electrodes that are perpendicular to both the direction of plasma flow and the magnetic field of the magnet.
Photos/Multimedia Gallery Available: http://www.businesswire.com/multimedia/home/20140114005647/en/
Contacts
BlackLight Power, Inc. Media: Beata Stepien, 609-490-1090 Ex 125 Assistant for Dr. Randell L. Mills bstepien@blacklightpower.com
Skeptopaths also know that if ambient air was made of cheese
***And if there were 14,700 replications of that scientific fact, skeptopaths would be in the wrong to argue against it. Right? Nahh, we can’t expect someone like you who has her finger tuned to the Asshole*Bandwagon index to suddenly become scientific in her thinking.
, it would be difficult-to-impossible to start your car without at least retuning your carburetor. Spockopaths finds this logical.
***You’re batting a thousand, Hogwash Dupe. You have not yet ONCE generated a post on LENR threads that furthers the scientific discussion. In a way, this distinguishes you. You must be proud.
To the extent that the entire sane part of the planet
***Science by bandwagon. Boy, what a surprise, coming from you /s
is laughing at Kevmo,
***The 2nd half of the Bandwagon*Asshole index. Here, you just jump into being an asshole. If you really had 40 years of nuke experience, you’d have been on all kinds of LENR theory threads, you’d have made some kind of contribution beyond what could be fit into the AHB index. But, the only time I’ve seen it is in one particular backwater discussion, perhaps because that is the area you once worked. But for that one little gift, the rest of your horse shit is a bunch of freshman level classic fallacies.
I guess I can understand why he cant seem to ever make a reply without a string of expletives.
***I addressed that upthread. Thanks for all your AHB insults, they keep the thread open. Why all of a sudden are YOU so concerned about insults and invective heading YOUR way? Didn’t you have enough fun upthread where the mods decided to keep this thread open ‘cause it made one particular side look bad? Now you start whining, which is indicative of how pure your bullshit is.
Still, he doesnt seem to understand that it detracts from his already silly arguments.
***As if you were truly discussing the science behind the claims. Ahh, poor FraudZagonner, he can’t take the insults now that it’s truly an open thread. What a pussy.
That’s how stupid the arguments have been towards LENR. Or are you saying that LENR Luddites can’t possibly be that stupid?
Spockopaths finds this logical.
***Who dislikes Spock? Can’t you spell? Can’t you write without the grammar being so broken as to question the level of your education? Do you have ANYthing to contribute? Look over the LENR threads where you participated, look at your responses and ask yourself, “what if I kept my mouth shut, would this have been a better thread?” The answer is: Hell yes.
Amen. But, i guess when the facts aren’t on his side he must feel the need for something to spice up his rantings.
Hey - check it out! Captain LENRy-Pants made it thru a whole post without any cussin’!!! Maybe mommy gave him the ol’ “hold this bar of soap in your mouth” treatment agin....
when the facts arent on his side
***You have notably posted absolutely ZERO fact-based information on LENR threads. If we look at your posts within the Asshole*Bandwagon Index, 100% of them fit within that designation. That’s the best skeptopath record on FR. Congratulations. If posting something requires you to be an asshole and jumping on a bandwagon, you have a perfect record.
Not only that, but when the ABW index is applied on other threads such as heretical teachings on FR, your record seems to hold as well. Such an exercise is left up to lurkers.
100% of your posts have had no furtherance of the science behind the claims.
Most skeptopaths would reconsider what they post and at least TRY to come up to speed. But you’re special, aincha?
I'm really old fashioned, so within a few inches of my hand I can only put my fingers on several bajillion devices based on -- and designed as a result of -- quantum mechanics. You know, pedestrian things that certainly didn't change the world like lasers, semiconductors. That type of non-world-changing stuff.
I thought you claimed to be a Double-E, but apparently in your EE curriculum you didn't learn about transistors, LED's, photocells... That's understandable -- they're REALLY NEW tech that Eugene Wigner and his students and later followers like Shottky did the physics for, oh, just eighty years ago. But your university will get around to teaching that stuff someday.
You learned EE at Rowan I'm guessing, right? [School Motto: YEARS OF FICTIONAL PHYSICS FOR THE MASSES, BUT NOT ONE COURSE IN QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR EE's.]
These devices aren't "demo'd" in fictional presentations, by the way. If you're in doubt about them head on over to Wal-Mart or RadioShack and have a look, or pick up a couple. Not as world-changing as LENR is [someday, real soon now] going to be. But kind of fun all the same.
Well let’s see. Being a Luddite, I don’t have a Mills Hydrino® Water Heater in my basement, like you do. Nor do I have the latest Rossi Technologies Mr. Fusion® in my DeLorean, as I am sure Kevmo does.
***Well, let’s see, being a pro-science rationalist, I don’t have a Controlled-Hot-Fusion water heater in my garage, but I’m sure you do.
I’m really old fashioned, so within a few inches of my hand I can only put my fingers on several bajillion devices based on — and designed as a result of — quantum mechanics. You know, pedestrian things that certainly didn’t change the world like lasers, semiconductors.
***You make a good point here. I type faster than I can review material on the web. I concede your point about QM changing the world.
I thought you claimed to be a Double-E, but apparently in your EE curriculum you didn’t learn about transistors, LED’s, photocells...
***I did. But I never deal with QM on a daily basis, so I don’t care much about it which is why when I type too fast, I shorthand around it.
That’s understandable — they’re REALLY NEW tech that Eugene Wigner and his students and later followers like Shottky did the physics for, oh, just eighty years ago.
***Yup. But with your 40 years of “experience” in nuke bullshit, it would appear that you’re just a technician who assumes a whole lotta crap that never gets used in real life. Oh well, what do I care when it comes to a perpetual skeptopath.
But your university will get around to teaching that stuff someday.
***Yeah, that guy who has a Nobel Prize in EE at my university might get around to using QM equations in everyday engineering life, but in your fantasy technician approach to things, he wouldn’t be qualified to do so.
You learned EE at Rowan I’m guessing, right? [School Motto: YEARS OF FICTIONAL PHYSICS FOR THE MASSES, BUT NOT ONE COURSE IN QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR EE’s.]
***You got some beef with Rowan? I haven’t heard one way or another about their program. They’re fully accredited, and they know far more than you do.
http://www.rowan.edu/colleges/csm/departments/
These devices aren’t “demo’d” in fictional presentations, by the way.
***There you go again, with your use of freshman classical fallacies. Your arguments are “demo’d” in fictional presentations.
If you’re in doubt about them head on over to Wal-Mart or RadioShack and have a look, or pick up a couple.
***Non sequitur. Rowan University doesn’t have anything to do with Walmart.
Not as world-changing as LENR is [someday, real soon now] going to be. But kind of fun all the same.
***I thank you for your glimpse into your supposed 40 years of nuclear “experience”. You were just a technician. You didn’t take any applied elecromagnetism courses, you didn’t get a BS in EE or anything remotely related to these technologies. At best, your BS is in Poly Sci because all you’ve demonstrated is the ability to jump on a bandwagon and be an asshole when you can get away with it. Yup. PoliSci, not Engineering. But, at least you’re right this time. And lucky for us, that will continue the thread to be open. Maybe I should make mistakes more often so I can treat you assholes the same you’ve been treating me for 5 years.
Never claimed any experience in "nuke bulls!t" [whatever that might be.] I was a condensed matter theorist, as you would know if you'd actually read any of the things I've posted to you.
It’s so difficult to keep you guys apart. You all look alike on the bitscreen.
What is it going to take to get you to examine the scientific evidence of these claims? How can a PhD physicist blithely strain out the gnat of 14000 replications but swallow the camel of, in your case, freshman level logical fallacies?
Why give credence to someone who’s paid not to agree with such results pushing forth the claim that the results aren’t worth pursuing? Why haven’t you gone onto the LENR theory threads and shown us where those theories don’t hold up? Especially if you’ve got experience in Condensed Matter? What are you afraid of? You’ve got more education than I do. But you act like someone who never made it past 11th grade critical thinking.
Then you’re saying that the anti-LENR Luddites really are that stupid?
kevmo kevmo kevmo!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.