Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You got to marry these girls when they're 15 or 16....The witch hunt begins on Robertson
THE DAILY MAIL ^ | 12/30/2013 | James Nye

Posted on 12/30/2013 6:12:09 PM PST by ealgeone

Unpleasant video footage of reinstated Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson has emerged in which he appears to advise young men to marry underage girls because they are easier to control.

In the 2009 Sportsmen's Ministry talk, Robertson, 67, who began dating his wife when she was 14-years-old, advises his audience, 'You got to marry these girls when they are 15 or 16. They'll pick your ducks' - which is a literal reference to removing dead bird's feathers.

Warming to his stereotypical redneck theme, Robertson, who was suspended from the A&E hit for nine days earlier this month for homophobic comments, tells the gathered crowd that in addition to being young, the girls have to know how to cook and carry a Bible - 'That'll save you a lot of trouble down the road.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2531462/You-got-marry-girls-15-16-Duck-Dynasty-star-Phil-Robertson-wades-new-controversy-advises-men-marry-underage-girls-newly-unearthed-video.html#ixzz2p0xejSC4 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: duckdynasty; glaad; homosexualagenda; marriage; philrobertson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: ealgeone
Yes bashing pedophilia is such a crime. I can't believe anyone would condone this. Are conservatives losing morals too? I just thought it was the liberals.
61 posted on 12/30/2013 8:38:46 PM PST by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

By gutter I was referring to gay marriage


62 posted on 12/30/2013 8:43:41 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

LOL!


63 posted on 12/30/2013 8:44:50 PM PST by freebilly (Creepy and the Ass Crackers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

ROFLOL. When did it become an American value that women must be 18 before they marry? Should they be 18 before they have sex? Is there a magical occurrence between 16 and 18 that makes a female ready? Why not 21?

Why not let individuals and their families deal with such personal matters?


64 posted on 12/30/2013 8:45:26 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

The most solid marriage I know of is a friend who was close to 30 and his wife was 15 or 16 when they married. They just passed their 40th anniversary. They raised the most responsible children of anyone I know too.


65 posted on 12/30/2013 8:46:59 PM PST by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

I watched this video. He is sharing his testimony. Shame on them for exploiting.


66 posted on 12/30/2013 8:50:47 PM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Teach

I don’t think these media guys have been outside of DC or NY City in their life...or at least they act that way.

From the 1970s in Bama, I’d say ten percent of the local gals were married by age sixteen, and twenty-five percent were married by the conclusion of high school. It might have changed over the past thirty years.

Based on the laws now....especially in Cal...a fifty-five year old gay guy could marry a fifteen year old gay kid. Course, the parents are involved, and at least one or two judges have to sign up to the process. I’m waiting for some journalists to suddenly wake up and realize what this means.


67 posted on 12/30/2013 9:13:19 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Can anyone think of famous people who married young and stayed together ‘til death? Lorretta and Mooney Lynn comes to mind.


68 posted on 12/30/2013 9:35:22 PM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I don’t hear the left screaming to loud when a 30 year old teacher has sex with a 14 year old boy.


69 posted on 12/30/2013 9:38:33 PM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican

Of course not, because the left’s view on sex is warped..they approve of two men screwing each other but have NO problem with adults having sex with children


70 posted on 12/30/2013 9:40:46 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

According to my wife who was from Mexico this was also the thinking of many men.
It is an old world way of thinking IMO.

I myself am married to someone over two decades younger, but she was not a teenager...
The negative thing about marrying someone who hasn’t lived any of life is that they would at some point want to find out what they missed and moved on, so the 16 deal isn’t often IMO a lasting deal.


71 posted on 12/30/2013 9:53:37 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Having women becoming mothers at a younger ages makes biological sense. A woman has all of her female eggs at birth. These eggs are subject to continuous damage to their DNA from environmental forces such as cosmic rays. The younger a woman gives birth, the less likely her offspring will have DNA damage that will cause birth defects. In earlier times, women were given to men at young ages in arranged marriages by the parents. This reduced the risk of children with birth defects.

Now women are having children at later ages and the incidence of Downs syndrome, the most common genetic defect has risen. woman’s risk of having a baby with Down syndrome is:

At age 25, 1 in 1,250
At age 30, 1 in 1,000
At age 35, 1 in 400
At age 40, 1 in 100
At age 45, 1 in 30
At age 49, 1 in 10

The cause of the rise of maternal age in women has been the entry of women into the job market. This has required women to postpone childbearing for the necessary education to become competitive in the job market. All has come at a cost.


72 posted on 12/30/2013 11:29:45 PM PST by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Roman Polansky drugged and sodomized a 15 year old girl. He is a hero to the left and celebrated in hollywood as a fearless movie maker.

But that is ok because at least it wasn’t “rape” rape.


73 posted on 12/30/2013 11:42:49 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petitfour
My God. I am stunned. I thought Free Republic was against pedophilia. You make me unsettled by your post.
74 posted on 12/31/2013 2:54:57 AM PST by napscoordinator ( Santorum-Bachmann 2016 for the future of the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

bump


75 posted on 12/31/2013 5:22:33 AM PST by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I don’t think anyone is advocating pedophilia here.


76 posted on 12/31/2013 5:24:56 AM PST by ealgeone (obama, border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

Excellent example of the double standard of the Left!


77 posted on 12/31/2013 5:26:39 AM PST by ealgeone (obama, border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
A 16 year old is not a child. You have issues.

/johnny

78 posted on 12/31/2013 5:32:50 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

I would go so far as to suggest that when evaluating the idea in modern days are marrying at that age against the culture and maturity levels say 50-75 years ago. There would be a time when a “boy or girl” of that age would be an embarrassment to still be living at home.

Now we have “kids” still living at home in the parents basement until their 40 yr. old adults!

What changed? Why did it change?

What caused such a shift in cultural moors that we now have 40 yr. old basement kids?

It is somewhat amusing to read how we do not expect a 16 year old girl or young man to be able to “play house.”


79 posted on 12/31/2013 5:42:49 AM PST by EBH ( The Day of the Patriot has arrived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Seriously, they’re the ones that try to reject all standards.

On what basis do they judge it as “wrong” to marry a 14-16 yr old (as long as you’re not a lot older)?

What standard can they point to?


80 posted on 12/31/2013 5:46:40 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson