Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Conversation with a TEOTWAWKI Survivor
Survival Blog ^ | 12/13 | Rachel M.

Posted on 12/07/2013 8:18:35 PM PST by Kartographer

As I heard Paul’s story, it became obvious to me that while we often have a laser focus on preparing to survive the impending collapse, his community had gone farther and made preparations for survival after the collapse. In other words: yes, he had to have practical necessities and skills to make it through whatever came his way – but what then? After the world as he knew it ended, was his community prepared to help create a new one?

(Excerpt) Read more at survivalblog.com ...


TOPICS: History; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; survivalblog; teotwawki
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last
To: B4Ranch
I think the women of yesteryear were much stronger than you are giving them credit for.

Interesting question: were they "stronger" because they were less apt to undermine or interfere with their husband's leadership and decisions with which they did not agree?

61 posted on 12/08/2013 7:59:00 PM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: papertyger; greeneyes; sockmonkey; Nepeta; Silentgypsy; Ellendra; murrie; blackangus

“While I agree modern women would take up arms to defend themselves and their own, I seriously doubt they would take up arms for much else, let alone an abstract concept such as freedom.”

Sorry you don’t know any smart women - perhaps you like to stay away from them if you perceive they might be smart.

Talk to women on this board about taking away their freedom as though they don’t understand “an abstract concept such as freedom”, and you wouldn’t last a minute if you did that for real in person to any one of them.


62 posted on 12/08/2013 8:37:01 PM PST by Marcella ((Prepping can save your life today. I am a Christian, not a Muslim.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

ping to 62. Mistake getting your name on there.


63 posted on 12/08/2013 8:40:59 PM PST by Marcella ((Prepping can save your life today. I am a Christian, not a Muslim.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry; Marcella
You are no match for greeneyes, of that I am sure.

What's that old Reagan quote about knowing so much that isn't true, lol?

By your slippery definition, Mexicans are Americans, Canadians are Americans, heck let's just throw in Central and South America, too! They're Americans according to your slippery definition.

****************************************************

You just can't quit, can you? And here I thought you and I had decided to call a amiable truce. LOL Yet there you go again, referencing Reagan to besmirch my abilities.

Now as to the “slippery” definition of Americans. That's the dictionary definition - read one if you can. It's an accurate use of the word American, and that's a fact.

Like I said, I'll quit if you quit. If someone happens to mention me, feel free to ignore that part of their post, or at least don't post some disparaging remark in response that could be interpreted that way. Good Night.

64 posted on 12/08/2013 9:21:49 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

Oh well, c’est la vie say the old folk. Get some sleep.


65 posted on 12/08/2013 9:34:34 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

That’s a possibility but I was referring to their mental state of mind and their lifestyle. Being able to handle whatever task came up because they were basically frontier women. In days of old the rules were : Either you fought and won or you died on the trail and became food for the carnivores.


66 posted on 12/08/2013 9:36:55 PM PST by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Right back at you.LOL


67 posted on 12/08/2013 9:42:18 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

I was at a pro 2nd amendment protest in a small park adjacent to the UN building in NYC. The gun grabbers had people there with video equipment who were obviously videotaping us. Creepy dudes.

One of them followed me most of the way back to my apartment. Even creepier.

Didn’t stop my freeping.


68 posted on 12/08/2013 9:42:26 PM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

That is creepy. I wouldn’t walk too far by myself in NYC. Daylight or night time.

I once shared a cab with a lady from NYC on my way to a board meeting, and she advised me to either take a cab, or stay in a group. So I did.


69 posted on 12/08/2013 9:48:44 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Marcella; greeneyes

Ladies, please forget those naysayer clowns and focus on the important issues like how to dispose of all the bodies lol!


70 posted on 12/08/2013 9:58:25 PM PST by Silentgypsy (Mondays should be outlawed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes; papertyger
Lordy, you know what the second amendment is and you were protesting in favor of the right to bear arms in New York City - you must be one of the smart women - papertyger shouldn't insult your intelligence to your face if he wants to take his next breath easily. Let me know by Freepmail which firearm you prefer. I'm partial to my Ruger 38 with laser and my PINK Ruger 22 LR rifle with the 15 round magazine.

You see, as you and I know, liberty gives us the right to have these weapons. Liberty is not a concept, it's right there in the weapons we have - you can see liberty. It's right there as you protested. And, we can see liberty in danger with dictator Muslim Hussein trying to rip it from us every single day.

Blessings on you, Agnes and thanks for that link to the plant containers as that is where I found what I needed at a good price. My plants will thank you in spring.

71 posted on 12/08/2013 10:09:25 PM PST by Marcella ((Prepping can save your life today. I am a Christian, not a Muslim.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy

That’s easy, pile them all at the entryway and let the Zombies from the city take care of them.


72 posted on 12/08/2013 10:11:24 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

For such a smart woman, you have a disappointingly limited repertoire.

Intimidated by women, say it to my face, blah blah blah.

That you equate a protest with a firefight only shows an understanding of neither. Protests only limit aggression to the extent the aggressor cares about the opinion of the protestor.

Hardly a consideration in a firefight, or an authoritarian takeover.

Tell me...how many governments throughout history have fallen due to the determined whingeing of women: aside from our own?


73 posted on 12/09/2013 12:07:39 AM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
That’s a possibility but I was referring to their mental state of mind and their lifestyle. Being able to handle whatever task came up because they were basically frontier women.

Oh I understand that, and agree. I merely wished to draw attention to the fact that modern women have become so used to getting what they want through organized nagging they have forgotten that it only works on their "friends," and means less than nothing to a true enemy.

The toughness exhibited by pioneer women was a function of them doing their part, not insisting on having their way.

74 posted on 12/09/2013 12:21:29 AM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: papertyger; Marcella

Tell me...how many governments throughout history have fallen due to the determined whingeing of women: aside from our own?

*****************************************************

Gee, let me think about that. It seems as though you are saying that our government has fallen due to the whinegeing of women, and it’s the only one.

Does that mean that you think all of the other governments that failed were failures of men who ignored their women’s whinegeing? Or did you think it was just male incompetence?LOL


75 posted on 12/09/2013 12:25:03 AM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Silentgypsy
Ladies, please forget those naysayer clowns and focus on the important issues like how to dispose of all the bodies lol!

That is precisely the kind of "indirect aggression" that shows all the prattle about fragile male egos is little more than projection.

Vanity, thy name is woman...with apologies to the Bard.

76 posted on 12/09/2013 12:42:52 AM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes
Gee, let me think about that.

Please do.

It is beyond dispute that the instant introduction of a numerically superior voting block with the passage of women's suffrage fundamentally changed the political dynamic of this country.

That would not have been a bad thing if at the same time the Constitution had been altered to restrain the "indirect aggression" of women as effectively as it restrains the "direct" aggression of men by the men who originally wrote it.

As things currently stand, nearly all of the undermining of our liberties have come about by the skillful application by unprincipled men of such indirect strategies employed by women throughout the ages.

77 posted on 12/09/2013 1:07:53 AM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

What? No answer to my questions regarding all those failing governments? Were they too difficult for you or too direct?


78 posted on 12/09/2013 1:12:28 AM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: crusher

I note that they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor. I wonder how close we are to that point again?

Comments self censored.


79 posted on 12/09/2013 1:49:38 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
That would not have been a bad thing if at the same time the Constitution had been altered to restrain the "indirect aggression" of women as effectively as it restrains the "direct" aggression of men by the men who originally wrote it.

Women are so bad.
80 posted on 12/09/2013 2:38:10 AM PST by Nepeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson