(and those three in the photo aren't likely to have much luck, even with 'easy' thrown in d;^)
ps: it's usually a good idea to make at least a cursory reply on threads you initiate, lest the Kitties pick up yer trail ...
Is this yet another example how low the self-esteem of many females has fallen? Does the feminist movement claim victory?
Have you ever noticed that you post only your own Examiner crap here?
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/by:usalady/index?tab=articles
Have you any thoughts on that?
Why do you think that FR is nothing more than a hit-farm?
Isn’t this what they wanted?
Feminists told them they have come a long way.
I guess there is farther to go.
Of course it’s no business of mine, I’m just a
old rogue male, a geezer if you will.
Feminizm leads to slutizm for the good looking ones (or the ones who can get a guy drunk enough).
Guys just sit back, laugh, get theirs and talk about just how stupid and easy girls are. Way to be empowered, ladiez...
I went to college 30+ years too late, I guess (joke)...
Yes, and they write blogs and pimp them here trying to get hits.
Sigh. Born decades too soon. Of course there’s always room for another degree. Think they’d be interested in a grandfather figure?
And how is this news? Was the same when I was in college too. Sluts get short-term attention, but rarely attain their long term objectives.
What about the skanky ones interested in pimping Examiner blogs?
Phi Mu has been around for a very long time.
I tried it last year but just as I got the rocks piled up, she walked away.
The irony is that most feminists are not getting any action at all.
What isn’t mentioned is that maybe 20% of the men are seeing 80% of the attention. Maybe it’s more like 10/90.
Women go for the “hot” guys, and would rather stay home than be seen with somebody their friends don’t “ooh” over. What then happens, though, is that the hot guys get so much action that they have no interest in committing to any particular woman.
Meanwhile, the women hit 30, discover that the hot guys have moved on to younger women, and are disappointed that the “nice” guys they rejected aren’t lining up to commit to high-mileage leftovers.
Devalue? What are they hinting at, that they should order the lobster instead? They look at it through an economic lens. I realize that in reality it’s that way too, but the women shouldn’t complain. They’re lucky to get the sex out of it imo and usually some other material goods as well.
Women at the zenith of their sexual power giving away their charms with little return. Doesn’t seem like a winning strategy to me, without even discussing the immorality of it all.
Really, all of these women will regret their behavior in their later years. Everyone knows what leads to happiness — a life-long, loving and monogamous relationship. Maybe, most people are not capable of that anymore.
As for men, we are wired differently. So, the promiscuity indulged in by many men won’t have the same devastating mental effects that promiscuity has on women. But, even men will grow tired of meaningless hook-ups. It may take a very long time for this to happen, but it almost always does happen.
In the immortal words of South Park’s “Chef”.....”There’s a time and a place for everything....and it’s called ‘college’.”
(and those three in the photo aren't likely to have much luck, even with 'easy' thrown in d;^)
ps: it's usually a good idea to make at least a cursory reply on threads you initiate, lest the Kitties pick up yer trail ...
Supply and demand sounds pretty close to Adam Smith’s economic approach applied to this topic.
Of course, he was bloody brilliant.
I have to wonder a bit about such news items.....something like 69% of college students are women....and so the 31% of the population are males.... 10% of the remaining 31% are gay, and another 10% are home at nights hitting the books...the remaining active males, have to be very busy men....
sad. and then the men come to expect this.