Posted on 08/25/2013 2:46:17 PM PDT by usalady
Have you ever heard the expression, “Why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free?”
It appears that some women on college campuses have become “cows” as women sell themselves short, allowing casual sexual “hooking up” to dominate their relationships with male students.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
I’ve read a credible report that up to 97% of “accessible” females on college campuses are likely to have at least one STD, human papilloma virus or chlamidia primarily. These may seem to be minor as far as any immediate consequence as far as males are concerned, but there are long term consequences, increased risk of cancer from HPV being one of them, and “down there” too. This ain’t the sixties, not even the seventies. You can’t just get a shot and be done with it anymore, not for a lot of what’s out there. Keep it zipped, imho.
The irony is that most feminists are not getting any action at all.
LOLOLOLOL.
Tested the page:
Suspicious Inline Scripts
Long suspicious script
if(!NREUMQ.f){NREUMQ.f=function(){NREUMQ.push(["load",new Date().getTime()]);var e=document.createE...
Back when I went to college in the 70s, the percentage of easy girls was much, much lower, but they were there, and they were there for the taking.
Fortunately, I was raised to respect women, even the unrespectable ones, so I have avoided contracting venereal diseases and producing bastards.
Free love isn't free.
Socialist feminists have been pushing this for 50 years now. SMASH THE PATRIARCHY. Women don't need marriage to be "complete". Go out there. Be a "cougar". Be a "maneater". Be an empowered dyke with no need of a man.
What isn’t mentioned is that maybe 20% of the men are seeing 80% of the attention. Maybe it’s more like 10/90.
Women go for the “hot” guys, and would rather stay home than be seen with somebody their friends don’t “ooh” over. What then happens, though, is that the hot guys get so much action that they have no interest in committing to any particular woman.
Meanwhile, the women hit 30, discover that the hot guys have moved on to younger women, and are disappointed that the “nice” guys they rejected aren’t lining up to commit to high-mileage leftovers.
Most sluts and lesbos have "daddy issues". With the low number of intact, two-parent homes, I imagine that having "daddy issues" is the norm for most girls.
Devalue? What are they hinting at, that they should order the lobster instead? They look at it through an economic lens. I realize that in reality it’s that way too, but the women shouldn’t complain. They’re lucky to get the sex out of it imo and usually some other material goods as well.
How plump is your wallet these days?
Yeah, once the odometer hits 100 . . .
Perhaps you could write JimRob and JohnRob, and suggest an FR modification, like people are only allowed to post one article for every 100 comments, or some such?
Please no, that would mean I’m about 450 articles behind...
Women at the zenith of their sexual power giving away their charms with little return. Doesn’t seem like a winning strategy to me, without even discussing the immorality of it all.
Really, all of these women will regret their behavior in their later years. Everyone knows what leads to happiness — a life-long, loving and monogamous relationship. Maybe, most people are not capable of that anymore.
As for men, we are wired differently. So, the promiscuity indulged in by many men won’t have the same devastating mental effects that promiscuity has on women. But, even men will grow tired of meaningless hook-ups. It may take a very long time for this to happen, but it almost always does happen.
Tested the page:
Suspicious Inline Scripts
Long suspicious script
if(!NREUMQ.f){NREUMQ.f=function(){NREUMQ.push(["load",new Date().getTime()]);var e=document.createE...
Perhaps examiner.com should be placed on the "ban" list, or at least relegated to the "Vanity" section, since it seems like every posting from there is from the poster pimping his/her own blog? I also don't like the suspicious javascript there. I made the mistake of going over there and my adobe plugin crashed.
I didn't and don't indulge like some of my peers did. I had no personal experience back in the day of one night stands or casual hookups but knew instinctively that I'd feel like a used kleenex if I did, in a large part due to how the smirking boys would talk about those girls. Wanted no part of that scene.
Hmmmmm ... reads like a page from ex-NY Jets QB Joe Namath's life.
Not true. Men are just impacted in different ways.
Look at the men's rights movement, or more accurately the lack of one. Men constantly complain about how fathers are shafted by the biased family courts and boys are shortchanged in school. However, when it comes to actually doing something about it...
Nothing.
Why?
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2010/01/04/it-is-time-for-some-male-bashing-of-our-own/comment-page-1/
Go for “silver fox.”
Or, for the "Weiner" effect, "Silver Danger."
;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.