Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/11/2013 12:41:32 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: servo1969

CDC: Turns Out There’s No Benefit to Reducing Salt At All

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Oh crud. I better start reducing my intake of sale. Right away. If the CDC says there is “No Benefit to Reducing Salt At All’, then I better reduce.

The CDC.

~hocc ptui~


2 posted on 07/11/2013 12:45:02 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

No, now they’re telling us fish oil supplements promote prostate cancer.


3 posted on 07/11/2013 12:45:29 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I figure that my salt use is for preservation.


4 posted on 07/11/2013 12:45:30 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I figure that my salt intake is for preservation.


5 posted on 07/11/2013 12:45:52 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
CDC: Turns Out There's No Benefit to Reducing Salt At All

And I heard that additional fish oil cause prostrate cancer in men. Sooner or later the sheeple will tire of all the junk science and those that "Know what's best for YOU".

6 posted on 07/11/2013 12:45:53 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

All those crappy bland Moochelle fries for naught...


7 posted on 07/11/2013 12:49:25 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

***Because arrogant, controlling people, who really should just be kindergarten teachers***

Sounds like a NYC mayor I know.


8 posted on 07/11/2013 12:50:31 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

So here is the current medical thinking: Exercise regularly, maintain a low body mass index, don’t smoke, drink alcohol only in moderation, keep cholesterol in goal range, eat fruits and vegetables, consume only “approved” medicines and supplements.

Do this and you are likely to live to age 85 at which point you’ll have a 50% likelihood of developing Alzheimer’s disease and then you won’t care about anything...


9 posted on 07/11/2013 12:51:02 PM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TheMom; Eaker

CDC: Turns Out There’s No Benefit to Reducing Salt At All

Ping


10 posted on 07/11/2013 12:51:25 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Great... now I will not feel guilty about eating potato chips.


12 posted on 07/11/2013 12:52:26 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

My tagline.


15 posted on 07/11/2013 12:56:30 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
I remember hear decades ago that the "salt is bad" theory derives from one sodium molecule bringing along six water molecules as it enters the bloodstream.

In addition to the restrictions mentioned in the article, kidney problems should have been mentioned as well.

16 posted on 07/11/2013 12:57:21 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

This reminds me of Algore telling us that trace amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere are going to cause the earth to burn to a crisp.


17 posted on 07/11/2013 1:01:19 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who could have guessed that one day pro wrestling would be less fake than mainstream journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
 photo c14a8055-1d53-4399-8035-c77616d3b3e0_zps72f3b846.jpg
19 posted on 07/11/2013 1:02:57 PM PDT by Fast Moving Angel (A moral wrong is not a civil right: No religious sanction of an irreligious act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Yeah, yeah. And eggs and sugar are bad for ya too.


20 posted on 07/11/2013 1:03:30 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
It took 3 clicks to get to the full, original article this news bite is based on. Here it is.

June 21, 2013 by DAVE MIHALOVIC CDC Admits Long-Standing Error in Medical Science - There Is No Benefit In Reducing Salt Intake And It May Even Be Dangerous

And THAT article is based on this May 14th CDC scientific study. And that study appears to have been a compilation of results from other studies...

22 posted on 07/11/2013 1:03:35 PM PDT by JediJones (Gridlock means taking credit for stuff that automatically happens while you do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

The true believers will not believe this and keep preaching the old way.


23 posted on 07/11/2013 1:04:06 PM PDT by I want the USA back (If I Pi$$ed off just one liberal today my mission has been accomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969; a fool in paradise

I remember when tomahtoes were gonna kill you, but that was when they were vegetables, before they became fruits.


26 posted on 07/11/2013 1:09:30 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
Wait, in a few years they will again begin to scare us about salt. Been there, done that. In the 80's, I remember the first gambit into salt hysteria. After some years of everybody reducing salt intake, somebody did an actual study, and guess what, oops, they were wrong.

So, everybody goes back to using salt, then a little later, oh, no, salt is evil again and everybody should ban salt (Mayor Bloomberg for instance). Now, again, oops, we were wrong.

Can we just stop listening to these people. The last time we went thru something like this (I think is was the avian flu thingy), I ended up deciding that the Govt. and the media want to keep us hysterical. Because, then, we are looking to the Govt. to DO SOMETHING!

29 posted on 07/11/2013 1:11:01 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

This illustrates a problem with EVERY form of singular top expert authorities on ANYTHING - making them the top offical experts does not make them right.

What we need is to reject the paradigm that accepts the creation of and authority given to “top official experts” of any kind.

We need “expert information” and dissemination of it, but single source, a single top offical source does not provide ALL the best expert information, it presents an official orthodoxy, that’s all.


32 posted on 07/11/2013 1:19:36 PM PDT by Wuli (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson