Should FR continue to blacklist Infowars articles? [JimRob reply at 47]

[grumpygresh]

Sources such as NYT, Wapo, Politico are permitted on FR and those organizations are not exactly unbiased or accurate. Generally speaking, I think Infowars presents a libertarian and constitutionalist perspective and has cleaned up its act over the last couple years.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Incoming!

[Alex Murphy]

Generally speaking, I think Infowars presents a libertarian and constitutionalist perspective and has cleaned up its act over the last couple years.

What was it's act like beyond the last couple of years?

[onyx]

LOL.

[re_nortex]

The 911 truther idiot Alex Jones and any of his material is not welcome on FR. Do not post it here!! Just banned a 1998 signup because he ignored my warnings!

See Jim Robinson's Post #3 dated Mon 29 Apr 2013.

[nomad]

Never knew it was. I go there regularly for a more “edgy” view, in light of the validation of many of those “edgy” or so called “tin foil hat” views, like the super spy net thrown over the former Republic, I see no reason why not to.

[Jim Robinson]

Yes. Jones’ wacky 911 trutherism is pure leftist idiocy. The man is a raving lunatic and you can tell him I said so.

Keep his bunk OFF FR!!

[nomad]

The out of the box approach is more of what we seem to need. Jones, like Beck, has been FOR YEARS saying that a NWO, or elitist statist cabal, is out to get our individual liberties view freedom. I see nothing to invalidate THAT view, just plenty of proof from everywhere. If that makes me anathema, then ban me too!

[Bidimus1]

To the question: Yes

[grania]

Absolutely. Conservatives hone our arguments if we don’t just talk to each other. Besides that, we’ll have to understand libertarian views and where they compliment conservative views. Without a meeting of the minds, there’s no way to save the US....from the dems and the ‘pubs in power.

[grumpygresh]

I knew this was coming. Yeah I know, the 911 stuff was over the top ...

[nomad]

This site can, but I`ll go where the f*k I want and view who ever the hell I please, don`t like it DEAL!

[Steely Tom]

"If that makes me anathema, then ban me too!"

[ansel12]

Besides that, we’ll have to understand libertarian views and where they compliment conservative views.

Libertarians do a pretty good job of fighting for the homosexual agenda at FR. They are out in full force with this 'Gay Marriage' thing.

[nothingnew]

Keep his bunk OFF FR!!

You are the boss and I agree with you, surprisingly so. (I usually don't agree with bosses)

FMCDH(BITS)

[smoothsailing]

We shouldn’t give those kooks any exposure. Screw ‘em.

[Viennacon]

Do we allow articles from the Daily Paul?

[humblegunner]

The man is a raving lunatic and you can tell him I said so.
Keep his bunk OFF FR!!

Dang, and I had just decided to start a blog...

[VietVet]

Jim’s site. Jim’s rules.

No one can, or wants to, stop you from visiting Infowars, or DU, or KOS, if you want to.

[TexasCajun]

... If that makes me anathema, then ban me too!

Try posting an Alec Jones piece?