Posted on 01/21/2013 7:50:23 AM PST by Candor7
See Video at link. Only handguns were employed at the Sandy Hook School Massacre. The Bushmaster CAR-15 was left in the trunk of the vehicle. The entire "assault rifle" ban initiative is strictly ideological and political. No shadow or color of excuse exists for the infringement of guaranteed 2nd amendment rights of the People.
[[No conspiracy or great plan - just incompetence.]]
Ask George Zimmerman if it was ‘just terrible reporting’ when the media INTENTIONALLY misled the public for MONTHS even after beign called out on their blatant irresponsbility and dispicable LIES- He’s still sufferign from what the media itnentionally did to him
Lanza supposedly went to St Limas church. It’s about a mile from Sandy Hook.
Most likely guess about the CNN footage is that it is from the day of the shooting and the idiots of CNN called it Sandy Hook.
Interestingly, a priest accused of molestation ended up at St Limas.John Castaldo
He was defrocked.
He would have been there when Lanza was a young boy.
I don’t think there are any lawsuits against St Limas. Plenty against a previous parish.
Don't know how many times this DECEMBER 15th report needs to be posted before everyone here has seen it addressed and debunked.
Even if it were true, what benefit is there to second amendment supporters in stating: "See!? Rifles aren't evil, handguns are!"
????Conspiracy theory.
The initial news reports were confused and full of errors. Some of them said he left the rifle in the car trunk. But later they said it was the shotgun, and that would seem to be the case. Media mistook a shotgun for a rifle.
The coroner said that the bullets used came from the .221 rifle. He COULD have been lying, but it seems unlikely. Certainly, it wasn’t a shotgun that was used.
In any case, it doesn’t make that much difference. The media and the politicians are playing this dishonestly, and even if he’d left the rifle at home they’d still be playing the same game—and would be believed by the usual idiots who prefer Big Government to freedom.
Um no. What do you see?
Are we supposed to check back periodically to see if you gave the answer, or what? How about just posting it so that we can move on.
The women are wearing heavy coats and the guy is dressed for warm weather. Just a very quick observation.
This much is not disinformation though:
-physical and video evidence that is enormously troubling. The lack of photos of any of the dead. The lack of egress for any emergency vehicles in any of the photos. The FEMA training that was within 20 minutes of the school, going on the same day. The fact that FEMA like training was going on in exactly the same way on the same days as two other massacres in the last decade. The incongruent timeline between the video testimony of witnesses and actual events. The witnesses whining as if they were crying, but with no actual tears shed. The laughing parent who stops laughing the moment he realizes the cameras are rolling. The two parents who do not look distraught at all, less than days after in a TV interview. The odd smiles on a whole family interviewed days after, with no tears. That Eric Holder was there the next day. The Google post of the event that was dated before the event. The Facebook memorial pages erected within 24 hours of the event. And- the totally bizarre public statements of the county coroner in Sandy Hook on the day of the event.
Until these things are addressed, no one in their right mind will believe anything the administration says about this event. It does not pass the smell test. Something is rotten here. People know a rat when they see one.
You seem to be getting buried in the static, which is exactly what the left wants us to do. Keep looking at the trees for any leaf that seems out of place and miss the big picture of the forest itself (removing our rights). If you obsess with every detail and every word said, you are distracted from everything else.
What we have here is two nuns in coats. That is all.
Sorry, you are right. A CNN reporter just happened upon the diary days after the facility had been lit on fire.
I see an old lady holding her coat closed on a cold, December day. You are obsessing over irrelevant details.
RummyChick,
I notice the nuns have coats, the lady between them and the man also is wearing a coat, and the man is not wearing a coat. All it tells me is the guy can tolerate cold weather better than the others in the picture.
“What we have here is two nuns in coats. That is all.”
You are wrong. Look at the vehicle behind the nuns in both pictures. Different vehicles.
What you have is a nun who is walking many steps with her hand in one position. Keeping the coat closed but not zipped up.
She is hiding something.
Could be something innocent.
But she is hiding something. I can see it in those photos. You can see it better in the lightened photos.
Two ugly nuns wearing sneakers?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.