Posted on 01/21/2013 12:36:06 AM PST by iowamark
On Jan. 18, 1863, troops from the 64th North Carolina Infantry under the command of Lt. Col. James Keith lined up 13 men and boys, ranging in age from 13 to 60, made them kneel and shot them at point-blank range. Then the soldiers tossed the bodies into a shallow grave, from where they were later reclaimed by family members for burial.
This incident in Madison County, N.C., known to history as the Shelton Laurel massacre, was hardly the worst example of violence visited on civilian populations during the Civil War. On Aug. 21, 1863, scarcely a month after the murders in North Carolina first received national press coverage, the Confederate guerrilla leader William C. Quantrill led a raid on Lawrence, Kan., that killed 183 men and boys.
But Shelton Laurel provides an especially compelling look at the internecine war between Confederate authorities and pro-Union sympathizers in the mountains of western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee. Madison County sits on the border with Tennessee and in 1863 was incredibly isolated...
The county also featured one of the states sharpest political divides over the issue of secession... it stemmed from an amalgam of class resentment against the slave owners and tenant farmers who had supported secession; a deeply engrained rural suspicion of urban places; and a widespread feeling that the wealthy were threatening hard-working common people.
The Unionism of Western North Carolina
was less a love for the Union than a personal hatred of those who went into the Rebellion. It was not so much an uprising for the government as against a certain ruling class.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com ...
****Huntsville Arkansas had a similar incident with hard feelings lasting into recent times.****
Perhaps it is because Madison County is the only county that voted to stay in the Union.
Dang! A FReeper who knows about Madison (Bogger) county Arkansas.
Happy Rain: "My paternal great grandaddy rode with Bedford Forest"
ought-six: "Mine, too..."
Tupelo: "Well, well well. That makes three of us. Only it was my maternal Great Grandfather...."
First of all, I have seen the historical marker at the intersection of NC 208 and 218.
Some of my relatives there, and their neighbors, have family connections to the victims.
Even to this day they are not so friendly to outsiders. ;-)
For those whose ancestors rode with Nathan Bedford Forest, one of my great-grandfathers fought against him -- on the losing side in October 1862, at Rutherford Station, Mobile & Ohio Railroad (northwest of Memphis, Tennessee), on the winning side in July 1864, at Tupelo, Mississippi.
I have the greatest personal respect for Forest, precisely because, when he had the opportunity, he did not do to my ancestor's unit as Keith did in North Carolina.
Indeed, I believe Forest's good behavior at Rutherford Station was returned in July 1864, at the battle of Tupelo, when Forest reconnoitering, rode right through a Union unit at night (much like Stonewall Jackson), but Forest escaped unharmed.
One good turn deserved another, I think.
And the key point to remember is that Forest's behavior was more the rule, Keith's the rare exception.
Interesting tagline to that book: “The killers had names, the victims had kin, and everybody had a gun.”
It is often easy to forget that our CW had by far the fewest atrocities committed during and following the war of ANY great civil war in history.
The Cherokee fought their own civil war in the middle of ours.
Not that this was much of anything new to them.
Brice’s Crossroads is still studied to this day as to how a smaller force (i.e., Forrest’s Confederates) could wreak havoc on a much larger force (i.e., Sturgis’s Federals).
Brice’s Crossroads is still studied to this day as to how a smaller force (i.e., Forrest’s Confederates) could wreak havoc on a much larger force (i.e., Sturgis’s Federals).
If you want to forget Sherman's (The Torch) Georgia and Carolina campaigns.... LOL
Do you understand the concept of less and more? Hint: less does not mean none.
If you wish to challenge my observation, feel free to demonstrate why I’m wrong by referencing a great civil war that had fewer atrocities.
LOL?
To keep things in perspective, let us rehearse again the Confederate invasions and operations in Union states and territories.
These invasions all left trails of pillage and destruction:
She was one of the very few lucky ones when Sheridan and Sherman raped, pillaged, burned and murdered across vast swaths of the South...
...but the North won the war and so writes the histories, but we in the South know from the telling of our forefathers the evil and cruel fascist behavior of the Union Armies in the South.
Sherman and Sheridan Blue Scum Bellies bragged for years that most the babies born in the South after the war were probably half Yankee (and not by choice).
My family was ruined by Sherman and like a Jew in old Poland I may be the illegitimate descendant of a rapist Cossack.
There is a book that I read a few years about called The South Was Right by the Kennedy brothers that really made me think that the South Was Right.
You forgot the invasion of Vermont. LOL
To be perfectly fair, the various CSA invasions of northern territory were generally better-behaved than those of the Union, particularly Sherman’s troops.
With the notable and obvious exceptions of the raid on Lawrence and similar actions by irregulars. But those were part of the “dirty war” in the border states carried out by irregulars, where atrocities were a lot more common than by regular troops of either side.
In fact, even at Lawrence the raiders are reported to have tipped their hats to the ladies before tossing their bound husbands and sons into the burning buildings.
Ran across an interesting article about Sherman’s March and how destructive it was in reality vs. myth.
http://people.cohums.ohio-state.edu/grimsley1/myth/myth.htm
Contemporary accounts are unanimous that SC suffered much more than GA or (particularly) NC, which doesn’t line up well with the mythology of the March across Georgia being all-destroying. If they destroyed everything in GA, how could they destroy a lot more in SC?
I do know that some of Sherman’s soldiers were hanged for rape, which doesn’t line up with such behavior being encouraged.
Fully 98% of both countries did not care one bit about slavery.
After enough Yankee soldiers were killed the survivors, their comrades, just wanted revenge and they didn't care for what cause—they wanted blood and the bodies of their hated enemies women...
The Red Army in East Germany during WWII is the best comparison.
I read it too. Interesting arguments but wrong conclusions. The southron slavers were wrong (thank God).
so was Lincoln.
98% percent of the Americans fighting against the Blue Scum Belly Union thug invaders had their own culture-one enshrined by Jamestown, Charleston, Savannah and New Orleans—that of defending their homes from war criminal bastards following the orders of avarice-ridden imperial Big Government fascist sons of bitches.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.