Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

With Over 100,000 Supporting Texas Secession, Ron Paul Weighs In
ZeroHedge ^ | 11/14/12 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 11/14/2012 4:58:42 PM PST by Kartographer

Actually, after the Civil War, nobody believes there is a so-called right to secession, but it is a very legitimate issue to debate because all of the states that came into the Union before the Civil War believed they have a right to secede and New England in the early part of the 19th century actually considered it, and nobody questioned them about whether they had the right to do it or not.

Since the Civil War, it’s been sort of a dead issue, but he brought it up. It stirred the media and believe me, it really stirred some of the liberal media where they started really screaming about what is going on here. “This is un-American”, I heard one individual say, “This is treasonous to even talk about it.”

Well, they don’t know their history very well because if they think about it, it’s an American tradition. It’s very American to talk about secession. That’s how we came into being. Thirteen colonies seceded from the British and established a new country, so secession is very much an American principle.

What about all the strong endorsements we have given over the past decade or two of those republics that seceded from the Soviet system? We were delighted with this. We never said, “Oh no. Secession is treasonous”.

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: ronpaul; secession; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
I am in no way a Ron Paul fan and except for his financial stand mostly I can stand his positions, but I must admit he makes a good case here.
1 posted on 11/14/2012 4:58:45 PM PST by Kartographer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
nobody believes there is a so-called right to secession,

The only rights you have are the ones you are willing to fight for.

2 posted on 11/14/2012 5:01:51 PM PST by DManA ( you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
Thirteen colonies seceded from the British and established a new country...

Then Maine seceded from Massachusetts, Kentucky seceded from Virginia, Tennessee seceded from North Carolina, and Vermont seceded from both New Hampshire and New York.

3 posted on 11/14/2012 5:03:37 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

If Texas pulled this off there would be no such highway as I-20 east.It would be I-20 west 4 lanes wide.


4 posted on 11/14/2012 5:06:54 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Amen Brother.

No State will be allowed to Secede without they are willing to fight.
It doesn’t matter about the right today any more than it mattered in the First Civil War.

If States want to Secede they better be ready to fight.

If they aren’t they may as well sit back and wait for the United States to fall apart, then take action.


5 posted on 11/14/2012 5:10:21 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

No kidding...I’d move in a heartbeat. Probably wouldn’t have to worry about a job as my employer would likely move as well.


6 posted on 11/14/2012 5:10:51 PM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

Zero corporate taxes. Huge money influx. Eliminate welfare. Secure the borders.

Texas could pave I-20 with gold.


7 posted on 11/14/2012 5:12:08 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward–Piven_strategy#section_1

We’re in the collapse the system stage. Once that happens all bets are off.


8 posted on 11/14/2012 5:13:00 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Wonder if some other states would see the benefit and follow suit.


9 posted on 11/14/2012 5:18:40 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright ("WTF?: How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost....Again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

Practically speaking, secession is hard because there is no “format” for how to secede in an orderly manner. So it would seem that the way to make secession a serious issue would be to suggest that a single state resolve a constitutional amendment to make secession and similar state rights an orderly process.

Then that state ask other states to join in passing their own resolutions affirming the right of states to peacefully secede. Such a resolution is not their demanding to secede, just creating a process by which it might happen.

A constitutional amendment to that effect.


10 posted on 11/14/2012 5:18:48 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (DIY Bumper Sticker: "THREE TIMES,/ DEMOCRATS/ REJECTED GOD")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA
The power to secede is not discussed in the Constitution. But all powers not discussed in the Constitution are reserved to the states or to the people. As you indicate -- the power and right is there for the taking, but we'll have to fight for it.

I'm in MA, so I'm doomed.

11 posted on 11/14/2012 5:22:01 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (Global Warming is a religion, and I don't want to be taxed to pay for a faith that is not mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

I understand the primary general point Ron Paul is making, why support the bankruptcy of other less frugal states, when your own state is genuinely striving to make ends meet and keep it’s own budget balanced. Why does everyone have to support California’s lack of productivity?


12 posted on 11/14/2012 5:22:01 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer

I agree. I’ll also give Paul credit for not changing his position on secession one iota. At least the man has consistency.


13 posted on 11/14/2012 5:23:32 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
The left will never let their slaves secede that is why there is all the “outrage”.
14 posted on 11/14/2012 5:25:19 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
Correct!!!
15 posted on 11/14/2012 5:27:35 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kartographer
I am in no way a Ron Paul fan and except for his financial stand mostly I can stand his positions, but I must admit he makes a good case here.

Presuming one ignores Texas' formal, legal, renunciation of the right of secession about a 146 years ago. Perhaps Ron can lead a campaign to renounce the renunciation. It's a rather silly conversation.

16 posted on 11/14/2012 5:29:49 PM PST by SJackson (none of this suggests there are hostile feelings for the US in Egypt, Victoria Nuland, State Dept)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Nh is the only state left with the right of citizens to revolt. Article10 of the nh state constitution. Free starters came here partly for this reason.
18 states had similar provisions but sadly gave them up.


17 posted on 11/14/2012 5:34:24 PM PST by Article10 (Roger That)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Article10
"The withdrawal of a State from a league has no revolutionary or insurrectionary characteristic. The government of the State remains unchanged as to all internal affairs. It is only its external or confederate relations that are altered. To term this action of a Sovereign a 'rebellion' is a gross abuse of language."

                 President Davis CSA

18 posted on 11/14/2012 5:37:52 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

I believe according to 1869 supreme court case an individual state is not permitted to Secede,
But a group of states are.

Going by declaration of independence only one state is needed, or a town for that matter.
If your seceding you would most likely view US supreme courts authority as any other nation would.
The US would most likely want their nuclear weapons back that are stored in Texas. Ukraine gave theirs back to Russia 5 years later.


19 posted on 11/14/2012 5:39:04 PM PST by Morris70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

That would fail with enough people leaving their jobs .


20 posted on 11/14/2012 5:41:43 PM PST by Morris70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson