All that money flushed down the crapper.
1 posted on
09/28/2012 6:53:27 PM PDT by
SMGFan
To: SMGFan
Oh yeah. Thicker sheet metal for a couple stall doors must cost an extra half a million easy.
To: SMGFan
Is it unisex and have little holes between the stalls?
It will
4 posted on
09/28/2012 7:06:04 PM PDT by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: SMGFan
Talk about pissing away money!!!
5 posted on
09/28/2012 7:08:29 PM PDT by
JimmyMc
To: SMGFan
They spent all that money — and it really stinks!
To: SMGFan
Talk about pissing away money!!!
7 posted on
09/28/2012 7:08:41 PM PDT by
JimmyMc
To: SMGFan
"A spokesperson for the Parks Department offered a reason for the extravagance: because public bathrooms are used so frequently, the city used more durable materials, such as
thicker gauge door metal and all-steel sanitary piping consultant's commissions to some fine gentleman who also engage in waste management and arranging personal loans at
relatively reasonable rates.
There, fixed it.
8 posted on
09/28/2012 7:11:06 PM PDT by
DemforBush
(100% Ex-Democrat.)
To: SMGFan
Da unions gotta get deir share.
Yous got a problem wid dat?
10 posted on
09/28/2012 7:14:22 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
To: SMGFan
Hey,these days it's essential that bathrooms are designed to accommodate all seven genders in a discreet and respectful way.That stuff costs $$$,particularly with union plumbers in NY making more than some brain surgeons.
11 posted on
09/28/2012 7:15:09 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Ambassador Stevens Is Dead And The Chevy Volt Is Alive!)
To: SMGFan
When I was in NYC they seemed to prefer pissing in telephone booths.
12 posted on
09/28/2012 7:35:45 PM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: SMGFan
Cheap union labor. It would have cost more than that if a non-union crew did it. (sarc for those of you who don’t get it.)
13 posted on
09/28/2012 7:42:58 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
("OF COURSE I TALK TO MYSELF - Sometimes I need an expert opinion")
To: SMGFan
Union corruption, graft and payoffs always drive-up the price; it could have been done for significantly less. Sounds like a blast bunker-grade crapper. It'll be trashed and unusable within 1½ years, I'd bet.
14 posted on
09/28/2012 7:43:16 PM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(Libs, dems, unions, leftist scum & murderous muzzies - are like bacteria: attack, attack, attack!)
To: SMGFan
How long before graffiti turns it into another dump?
17 posted on
09/28/2012 8:08:01 PM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: SMGFan
WHAT??
It was only supposed to cost $1.9 million. (not kidding)
18 posted on
09/28/2012 8:17:57 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: SMGFan
21 posted on
09/28/2012 11:17:59 PM PDT by
hoagy62
("Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered..."-Thomas Paine. 1776)
To: SMGFan
I’m an engineer and years ago worked as a sub-consultant for a NYC Parks job. Almost as a favor to help a contractor that was in over their head and wanted to get the job over with.
They are actually very very very frugal with spending but in a completely idiotic way. Basically, their rules force them to save $1 today even if it means that they will end up losing $100 over the course of the project.
The rules are intended to reduce corruption and favors to connected firms but instead they get “impossibly low bidder” unqualified firms that give up once they realize how much money they are losing jumping through Parks’ hoops. Eventually you end up with a building that was basically rebuilt several times in pieces by several of these incompetent firms fixing each other mistakes.
Most firms that foolishly win a Parks job never ever bid on them again. I know at least 5 firms that went bankrupt after making a deal with the devil known as “Parks”.
22 posted on
09/29/2012 7:44:43 AM PDT by
varyouga
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson