Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NFL supports decision to not overturn Seahawks’ touchdown
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000066164/article/nfl-supports-decision-to-not-overturn-seahawks-touchdown?module=HP11_breaking_news ^ | National Football league

Posted on 09/25/2012 10:45:44 AM PDT by djf

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: VideoDoctor

Well, you must be a Packers fan.

99% of the time, a ball batted down will be incomplete ... yes, occasionally it will end up being caught, but the odds are strong that it will fall incomplete.

100% of the time a simultaneous catch goes to the offense. It has to be clear and incontrovertable that the ball was intercepted ... which historically has meant that no part of the offensive players hands are touching the ball.

You must be a democrat sore loser, because you seem to want to change the rules because you lost the game. Just like in politics, bad cases make bad case law. Changing the rules so the Packers would have an interception is what would have been a real travesty. The ruling on the field was correct by the standards of football since the forward pass was invented.


81 posted on 09/25/2012 1:07:14 PM PDT by RainMan (After 4 years of Hope and Change America needs a little R&R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Granted, this pic is a split second after both players hit the ground , but you can clearly see Tate's hands securely wrapped around the ball, whereas Jenning's left hand is over his head. Photobucket
82 posted on 09/25/2012 1:07:14 PM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus
What I see is the same thing the NFL sees.

What the NFL sees is whatever it wants to see to cover it's @$$. You are seeing what one of the replacement refs saw (one was calling it the other way). The call was bad, there were many, many bad calls both ways in this game, this one just happend to be at the end and gets the spotlight...

83 posted on 09/25/2012 1:08:33 PM PDT by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch
"Cannot tell from these selective pictures/video what Jennings left leg does" I think we can tell from this pic that his leg is still in the air as Tate hits the ground. Photobucket
84 posted on 09/25/2012 1:12:12 PM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

Watching the video on ESPN looks like this pic is AFTER they came down. If your scenario was accurate the NFL would have confirmed the call. They did not.


85 posted on 09/25/2012 1:16:13 PM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus
YOU watch the replay. BOTH of Tates’ hands reach up and grab the football.

Check the slo-mo clip in Post 56. Watch Tate's right hand/arm. Watch *only* Tate's right hand/arm. As the players are falling to the ground, you will see Tate's right hand/arm swing around, and then look like it's reaching into Jenning's face-mask.

86 posted on 09/25/2012 1:16:25 PM PDT by kevao (Is your ocean any lower than it was four years ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: !1776!

I’m a Hawk fan, so I do have a vested interest in the outcome of the game, but reasonable minds should be able to see this fact from the video I posted. Both players simultaneously go up for the ball and have both hands wrapped around it when they hit the ground, only Tate hits the ground first, without a doubt, and as long as he doesn’t let go of it after that, it can be considered a good catch.


87 posted on 09/25/2012 1:24:13 PM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: kevao

“As the players are falling to the ground, you will see Tate’s right hand/arm swing around, and then look like it’s reaching into Jenning’s face-mask. “

I see Tate’s arm swinging around and securing the ball, not reaching in to the defender’s face mask.


88 posted on 09/25/2012 1:28:06 PM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus
I see Tate’s arm swinging around and securing the ball,

The whole time Tate's right arm is swinging around, attempting to get hold of the ball, Jennings has already secured the ball with *both* hands.

89 posted on 09/25/2012 1:31:26 PM PDT by kevao (Is your ocean any lower than it was four years ago?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: djf

Hit the NFL in the pocketbook.

I cancelled my account to NFLShop.com and informed them I am done with this charade of an NFL season and will no longer purchase any more of their products and will be encouraging others to do the same.

Here is the link where you can leave your comments:

http://www.nflshop.com/helpdesk/index.jsp?display=store&subdisplay=contact&stillHaveQuestion=yes&clickid=botnav_privacy_txt


90 posted on 09/25/2012 1:32:42 PM PDT by ThE_RiPpEr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevao

“The whole time Tate’s right arm is swinging around, attempting to get hold of the ball, Jennings has already secured the ball with *both* hands. “

And that doesn’t mean jack until both of his feet touch the ground. I portend that by that time, Tate had bought his right arm in, secured the ball, and had both feet and maybe his rear end hit the ground.


91 posted on 09/25/2012 1:34:58 PM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

Why is everyone saying the NFL didn’t confirm the call. Doesn’t this quote from the article count as confirmation?

“Referee Wayne Elliott determined that no indisputable visual evidence existed to overturn the call on the field, and as a result, the on-field ruling of touchdown stood. The NFL Officiating Department reviewed the video today and supports the decision not to overturn the on-field ruling following the instant replay review.”


92 posted on 09/25/2012 1:39:15 PM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GnL

“I’d like to think it all comes out in the wash. Thank you to the Green Bay fans who left our stadium peacefully and didn’t try to burn down Pioneer Square.” ....

Packer fans a different that other football fans by far and away. Football is just a game and win or lose, we are still Packer fans and know there will be another game. We will not lower ourselves out of frustration. We also know that football provides NOTHING to our gross national product. It is entertainment and nothing more. Indeed, indirectly there might be items produced by football players themselves provide ONLY entertainment. Its a game, get over it.


93 posted on 09/25/2012 2:51:17 PM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

Actually in this feet don’t matter. The rule is about control (hands) not possession (feet). Jennings had two hands on the ball (control) when Tate had no hands on the ball, Tate eventually got hands on the ball, but Jennings was first and the rule directly states if one player has control before another player gets joint control the joint control doesn’t matter, possession goes to the first player with control.


94 posted on 09/25/2012 2:59:07 PM PDT by discostu (Put another dime in the jukebox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Having two feet down with control of the ball absolutely does matter.


95 posted on 09/25/2012 3:55:13 PM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

Not for this section of rule. This section is ENTIRELY about control, then once you’ve used the rule to decide who has control you look at the feet to decide where they had control. But for the joint possession issue feet don’t matter.

Here’s the rule:
The player who first controls and continues to maintain control of a pass will be awarded the ball even though his opponent later establishes joint control of the ball.

http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/forwardpass

Notice no feet. Just control. Jennings established control and maintained control while Tate established joint control. It happened just like the rule is written, Jennings had control. From there you look at his feet, if they hit inbounds INT and touch back, if not out of bounds, which of course end of the game that doesn’t matter. But that’s when feet become an issue.


96 posted on 09/25/2012 4:05:18 PM PDT by discostu (Put another dime in the jukebox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

After ain’t when.


97 posted on 09/25/2012 4:08:39 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (We canÂ’t just leave it (food choice) up to the parents. -- moochele obozo 2/12/2012 (cnsnews))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: discostu

You wont find it in any rule book. Possession doesn’t begin till you hit the ground.


98 posted on 09/25/2012 5:09:16 PM PDT by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: RainMan
You must be a democrat sore lose

Just like your screen name of Rain Man your logic and reasoning are so far off the mark I doubt You could locate the space needle if it was in your front yard.

97% of those polled have agreed it was the WRONG call.

But keep arguing your point and then we'll know for sure you must be a LOONEY LIBERAL.

99 posted on 09/25/2012 5:37:45 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

It is in the rule book, I just quoted it to you, and the question isn’t possession, it’s control. To have possession you have to have control, with feet inbounds, but the rule in question only discusses control, not possession. Control doesn’t involve the feet.


100 posted on 09/26/2012 8:46:04 AM PDT by discostu (Put another dime in the jukebox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson