Maybe the love their country and don’t want to see it destroyed by a incompetent corrupt neo-Marxist regime.
Cognitive dissonance.
so long as they don;t push their homosexual agena and shut up about their sex lives and not want the rest of us to think they should have their special laws, special marriage etc.
if they do then they can piss ff , and the left are endorsing what they want
If Mitt wants homosexual Boy Scout Leaders then he’ll okay homosexual marriage any day now.
The bully-boys know that.
Gay or not, if they want to actually enjoy the results of their labor, they should be Conservative.
Only lazy idiots and fascists are democrats.
they CORRECTLY observe that gay marriage
was imposed, and therefore created, by Mitt Romney.
He has been pro-gay most of his career of course, it’s the conservatives who are told to grin and bear it
There are gay people who don’t support the “gay rights” agenda and are more interested in having a strong, stable economy and reductions in the size of government and a strong defense. Its the Libs who have everyone believing that if you are gay or black or a woman or some other minority that you automatically are for special rights for minorities. Most people want to just live their lives without being bothered by government.
Gays have to live in this country too. They have to suffer the consequences of political and cultural realities. As for gay marriage, if they want it, let them vote for Democrats who share their cultural vision. There are trade offs to be made in politics.
They can Go To Hell.
...if you are a real AMERICAN (that's it no more and no less) you are conservative.
Conservatives should accept that there are gay people living quietly without pushing for any gay agenda. Some of them might be even religious and conservative themselves, and live next door. Saying that all gays must hold same view and behaviors basically accepts liberal mindset that everyone belonging to a social group would think and behave the same.
Well, in MA he used to bring them into his office and assure them he was there for them, he would do whatever they asked, etc. He still supports abandoning kids to sodomite “parents”, and allowing them into the Scouts. So this is no surprise, really.
“Because after we’re married, Mitt Romney supports our right to adopt!”
I guess the strangest detour this thread has taken is away from looking at some particular policy, that some people think there is a single orthodox definition of Conservatism, and it is theirs, and everyone else is not a Conservative.
If they reprsent a majority of Conservatives, then no wonder so many Conservatives do not do well with making alliances with other Conservatives, compete against each other in elections, split their ranks and leave their most common foe the ability to win on a mere plurality.
At one point social Conservatives gave up that aproach, built a base in the GOP, allied with others in the GOP and won many victories, even as they accepted all was not perfect.
What happened?
You know, I don’t mind if Conservatives are gay and like Romney. I just wish they wouldn’t be so vocal about it, and embarass the rest of us. Can’t they just go like Romney in the privacy of their own homes and spare us the details?
Bullcrap- they are communist moles:
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”