Skip to comments.
Astronomy Picture of the Day -- M45: The Pleiades Star Cluster
NASA ^
| September 03, 2012
| (see photo credit)
Posted on 09/03/2012 12:23:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
Explanation: Perhaps the most famous star cluster on the sky, the Pleiades can be seen without binoculars from even the depths of a light-polluted city. Also known as the Seven Sisters and M45, the Pleiades is one of the brightest and closest open clusters. The Pleiades contains over 3000 stars, is about 400 light years away, and only 13 light years across. Quite evident in the above photograph are the blue reflection nebulae that surround the brighter cluster stars. Low mass, faint, brown dwarfs have also been found in the Pleiades. (Editors' note: The prominent diffraction spikes are caused by the telescope itself and may be either distracting or provide aesthetic enhancement, depending on your point of view.)
(Excerpt) Read more at 129.164.179.22 ...
TOPICS: Astronomy; Astronomy Picture of the Day; Science
KEYWORDS: apod; astronomy; m45; pleiades; science; sevensisters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
1
posted on
09/03/2012 12:24:01 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
To: brytlea; cripplecreek; decimon; bigheadfred; KoRn; Grammy; married21; steelyourfaith; Mmogamer; ...
M45 is about seven miles from here.
2
posted on
09/03/2012 12:24:49 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
3
posted on
09/03/2012 12:26:33 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: SunkenCiv
4
posted on
09/03/2012 12:32:34 PM PDT
by
Nik Naym
(It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
To: Nik Naym
Yep. Subaru is Japanese for The Pleiades.
Had one, hope to have one again some day. Great little car.
5
posted on
09/03/2012 12:45:31 PM PDT
by
null and void
(Day 1323 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama, a queer and present danger)
To: SunkenCiv
Why do you think it’s 400 light years away?
6
posted on
09/03/2012 12:48:22 PM PDT
by
SAR
To: Nik Naym
7
posted on
09/03/2012 12:49:14 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
The Pleiades is a good object to illustrate an anomaly of our vision. Our eyes cannot collect the most light when looking straight ahead, but when looking slightly to the side. You might be able to see a certain number of stars in the Pleiades (perhaps 5 to 8) on a clear night when looking straight at it, but you might be able to see another star or two when you look slightly to the side and catch it “out of the corner of your eye”, so to speak. Try it. It works.
8
posted on
09/03/2012 12:55:20 PM PDT
by
Engraved-on-His-hands
(Mitt Romney is a handbasket driver. I refuse to ride.)
To: SAR
9
posted on
09/03/2012 12:59:12 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
God to Job: “Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion?” (Job 38:31)
“The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament shows His handiwork.” (Psalm 19:1)
God, the awesome creator!
10
posted on
09/03/2012 1:02:58 PM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands; cripplecreek
11
posted on
09/03/2012 1:16:49 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SAR
Because it takes 400 years to get all that dark out of the way.
To: SunkenCiv
Like my girls said, “Oooohhhh, sparkly!” Beautiful, Sunky.
To: SunkenCiv
That’s where the greys are from. Or so they say.
14
posted on
09/03/2012 2:05:49 PM PDT
by
Vermont Lt
(I am NOT from Vermont. I am from MA. And I don't support Romney. Please read before "assuming.")
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
The phenomena that you describe is due to the structure of the human eye. Basically the receptors in the eyes are cells that are rod shaped and cone shaped. The cones are in the center and the rods at the edge. You use the cones in good light and the rods in poor light conditions.
To illustrate this, toss a ball into the air in poor light, after dusk. If you try to look directly at the ball, you will not catch it. Look to the side and you, using the rods, will see it more clearly and be able to catch it!
15
posted on
09/03/2012 2:17:53 PM PDT
by
BatGuano
(You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
To: Engraved-on-His-hands
The Pleiades is a good object to illustrate an anomaly of our vision. Our eyes cannot collect the most light when looking straight ahead, but when looking slightly to the side. You might be able to see a certain number of stars in the Pleiades (perhaps 5 to 8) on a clear night when looking straight at it, but you might be able to see another star or two when you look slightly to the side and catch it out of the corner of your eye, so to speak. Try it. It works.
I remember Carl Sagan told the same story in hos book, "Cosmos" where back in 1957, as a graduate student, he got a phone call from a man who saw a comet but when he looked direct at it, it disappeared but if he turned his eyes away slightly, he can see it. I've noticed it myself too.
16
posted on
09/03/2012 2:18:07 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(June 28th, 2012, the Day America Jumped The Shark.)
To: Vermont Lt
Thats where the greys are from. Or so they say.
I've heard that too, but scientists say the stars are too young for life to have come about on their planets if they have any in orbit. Still for the sake of argument, if they did have planets, I assume they could have come from somewhere else and built bases and/or a new home there.
17
posted on
09/03/2012 2:20:14 PM PDT
by
Nowhere Man
(June 28th, 2012, the Day America Jumped The Shark.)
To: SunkenCiv
ask any of your atheist friends if they think that this just “happened”?????
18
posted on
09/03/2012 2:57:40 PM PDT
by
terycarl
To: SunkenCiv
I love that segment of the heavens!
19
posted on
09/03/2012 3:11:40 PM PDT
by
left that other site
(Worry is the Darkroom that Develops Negatives.)
To: SunkenCiv
Galileo published this diagram of his observation of the Pleiades. I can find corrrespondence of most of the lesser stars to a modern photograph, but their spatial relation is quite distorted. This is because the field of view of his telescope was so small that he had to mentally stitch the scene together. Even with this allowance, I find the three stars at the top under "CONSTELLATIO" problematical to identify.
20
posted on
09/03/2012 3:55:51 PM PDT
by
dr_lew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson