Posted on 04/02/2012 6:15:17 AM PDT by Daffynition
Full title: 'OJ is innocent': Private investigator claims Simpson's SON hacked star's wife and friend to death... and he went to trial to cover it up
A Texas private investigator claims he knows who really killed Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman in 1994. And it wasn't OJ Simpson.
In a new book, 'OJ is Innocent and I Can Prove It,' William C. Dear alleges Simpson went on trial, and was acquitted of murder, in an effort to deflect attention from the true killer: His son Jason.
Dear says Simpson was at the crime scene -- but not until after his ex-wife and her friend had been stabbed to death.
After a 17-year investigation, Dear says he has found circumstantial evidence that links Jason Simpson, 41, to the murders.
The private eye claims he dug through Jason Simpson's garbage and his abandoned storage locker in search of new evidence, the New York Post reported.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Orenthal is back in the news...but we know it was "Pe-dro Gue-rre-ro"
The glove belonged and FIT Jason!
“The glove belonged and FIT Jason!”
####
But dat don’t rhyme like ma boy Johnny Cochrane’s rap:
Cochrane: “The glove don’t fit so you must acquit.”
The Simpson jury, in addition to being proud racists, was considering evidence at the cognitive level of a pre-schooler.
.
I haven't seen the new book, but an older printing claimed that Jason killed Nicole and her boyfriend after arriving at the house and seeing them together. Jason is(was) a chef, and had just received back his work knives from a professional sharpener.
OJ covered up for Jason to spare his son.
Dear may be getting old, and pushed through a book to capitalize on his previous fame, in his retirement.
FWIW, we used to live down the road from him and he was a really nice guy, not at all a kook.
you mean it made them even more envious.
The son asked OJ for the car and he told him “I don’t know, go axe your mother.”
So he did.
I’ve always had one question. Mark Furhman said they found a bloody fingerprint on the gate and he told his partner they may have the fingerprint of the killer. (This was before the other cops got there.) The fingerprint was never introduced into evidence. This proves it wasn’t O.J.’s fingerprint. So, whose was it?
There were photos of him wearing the shoes on the sidelines of a football field.
Other investigations he has worked on are the Exhumation of Lee Harvey Oswald, The disappearance of the Teenage Genius and the Alien Autopsy, according to his website.
I can't find if he claims if the alien was real or faked.
“Its just dead white people. Who cares?”
Just what I was thinking — nothing to see here, move along.
OJ’s son did not have OJ’s DNA signature. While half of the markers the son had would be the same - the other half would be different. Blood at the scene was unarguably OJ’s - not his son's DNA.
This might be compelling ‘evidence’ to idiots who don't understand DNA identification.
I think I remember seeing a picture of Marcus Allen wearing fingernail polish back in the day.
Kardashian knew it, too. If there was any doubt, watch the infamous tape of his defense team when Ito ruled not guilty. Kardashian looks like it finally hit him full in the face what they'd done and he's going to barf right there. Also, note that he and OJ had been friends but he severed ties with OJ right afterward.
Not necessarily. Just because there was a bloody impression, that doesn't mean that a useful and identifiable print can be lifted from it. It's actually more uncommon than common for most prints to be useful. They're typically smudged. It takes fairly ideal conditions for a print to be readable and identifiable.
Just a few facts from the case:
1)Simpson did own Bruno Magli shoes, the kind of shoeprints left at the crime scene. Many pictures were found of him wearing those at a football game. Those shoes were never found. (Some of this evidence was presented at the later civil trial.)
2) Simpson wore size 12 shoes, the same size left at the crime scene.
3) Simpson did own Isotoner gloves, the kind found at the crime scene and at Simpson’s home. Pictures showed him wearing a pair at a football game, plus receipts were presented showing that Nicole had purchased them.
4) The killer had a cut somewhere on the left side of his body. We know this because blood was dripped along the left side of the killer’s footprints. Simpson had a cut on this left hand the next day.
5) The DNA matched Simpson’s.
6) Simpson had no real alibi for the time in question.
7) Simpson acted like a guilty man. Why try to run when you’re innocent?
8) He had plenty of motive. He’d battered Nicole in the past and made threatening comments to her.
This should’ve been an open and shut case, but the defense had the race card, and as Robert Shapiro stated, they played it “from the bottom of the deck”. Simpson is guilty. Will he ever truly confess? That remains to be seen.
oh please... he as much as admitted it already
I have always thought his son might have done it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.