'OJ is innocent': Private investigator claims Simpson's SON hacked star's wife ... [snip]

DailyMail ^ | April1, 2012 | Daily Mail Reporter

[angcat]

I'm sure he helped but Robbin Cotton of CellMark confirmed OJ’s DNA was all over the crime scene.

[JRios1968]

Romey Ping!

Orenthal is back in the news...but we know it was "Pe-dro Gue-rre-ro"

[WellyP]

The glove belonged and FIT Jason!

[EyeGuy]

“The glove belonged and FIT Jason!”

####

But dat don’t rhyme like ma boy Johnny Cochrane’s rap:

Cochrane: “The glove don’t fit so you must acquit.”

The Simpson jury, in addition to being proud racists, was considering evidence at the cognitive level of a pre-schooler.

.

[texas booster]

Dear has been on this case forever. He is one of the old school detectives who made his name in the 70’s and 80’s.

I haven't seen the new book, but an older printing claimed that Jason killed Nicole and her boyfriend after arriving at the house and seeing them together. Jason is(was) a chef, and had just received back his work knives from a professional sharpener.

OJ covered up for Jason to spare his son.

Dear may be getting old, and pushed through a book to capitalize on his previous fame, in his retirement.

FWIW, we used to live down the road from him and he was a really nice guy, not at all a kook.

[cricket]

A bad case if 'Private Investigator' needing a job and some 'exposure' to get one.

[the invisib1e hand]

I thought it was common knowledge. IIRC Simpson divorced his black wife and then married a white woman and it angered some in the black community.

you mean it made them even more envious.

[Only1choice____Freedom]

The son asked OJ for the car and he told him “I don’t know, go axe your mother.”

So he did.

[Terry Mross]

I’ve always had one question. Mark Furhman said they found a bloody fingerprint on the gate and he told his partner they may have the fingerprint of the killer. (This was before the other cops got there.) The fingerprint was never introduced into evidence. This proves it wasn’t O.J.’s fingerprint. So, whose was it?

[bgill]

Prints matched size 12 Bruno Maglis, a relatively rare and expensive Italian-made model Simpson wears size 12 shoes No evidence presented that Simpson owned such shoes

There were photos of him wearing the shoes on the sidelines of a football field.

Other investigations he has worked on are the Exhumation of Lee Harvey Oswald, The disappearance of the Teenage Genius and the Alien Autopsy, according to his website.

I can't find if he claims if the alien was real or faked.

[Baynative]

OJ innocent? Not by a long shot.

[Polyxene]

“It’s just dead white people. Who cares?”

Just what I was thinking — nothing to see here, move along.

[allmendream]

Wow is that ever stupid.

OJ’s son did not have OJ’s DNA signature. While half of the markers the son had would be the same - the other half would be different. Blood at the scene was unarguably OJ’s - not his son's DNA.

This might be compelling ‘evidence’ to idiots who don't understand DNA identification.

[Ax]

I think I remember seeing a picture of Marcus Allen wearing fingernail polish back in the day.

[bgill]

I spoke with Phil Vanatter shortly after the murders and he said that they had Simpson cold.

Kardashian knew it, too. If there was any doubt, watch the infamous tape of his defense team when Ito ruled not guilty. Kardashian looks like it finally hit him full in the face what they'd done and he's going to barf right there. Also, note that he and OJ had been friends but he severed ties with OJ right afterward.

[Ramius]

I’ve always had one question. Mark Furhman said they found a bloody fingerprint on the gate and he told his partner they may have the fingerprint of the killer. (This was before the other cops got there.) The fingerprint was never introduced into evidence. This proves it wasn’t O.J.’s fingerprint. So, whose was it?

Not necessarily. Just because there was a bloody impression, that doesn't mean that a useful and identifiable print can be lifted from it. It's actually more uncommon than common for most prints to be useful. They're typically smudged. It takes fairly ideal conditions for a print to be readable and identifiable.

[Kharis13]

Just a few facts from the case:

1)Simpson did own Bruno Magli shoes, the kind of shoeprints left at the crime scene. Many pictures were found of him wearing those at a football game. Those shoes were never found. (Some of this evidence was presented at the later civil trial.)

2) Simpson wore size 12 shoes, the same size left at the crime scene.

3) Simpson did own Isotoner gloves, the kind found at the crime scene and at Simpson’s home. Pictures showed him wearing a pair at a football game, plus receipts were presented showing that Nicole had purchased them.

4) The killer had a cut somewhere on the left side of his body. We know this because blood was dripped along the left side of the killer’s footprints. Simpson had a cut on this left hand the next day.

5) The DNA matched Simpson’s.

6) Simpson had no real alibi for the time in question.

7) Simpson acted like a guilty man. Why try to run when you’re innocent?

8) He had plenty of motive. He’d battered Nicole in the past and made threatening comments to her.

This should’ve been an open and shut case, but the defense had the race card, and as Robert Shapiro stated, they played it “from the bottom of the deck”. Simpson is guilty. Will he ever truly confess? That remains to be seen.

[Mr. K]

oh please... he as much as admitted it already

[winodog]

I have always thought his son might have done it

[aruanan]

4) The killer had a cut somewhere on the left side of his body. We know this because blood was dripped along the left side of the killer’s footprints. Simpson had a cut on this left hand the next day.

As you recall, the only blood evidence tying Simpson to anything was planted because it contained EDTA. The sock on his bed was found to have the blood going through from one side to the other. It had not been splashed on during a murder. It had been poured on in situ in OJ's house. The blood on the back gate that didn't appear earlier, was later found after the LA detective returned to the house carrying OJ's blood in stoppered vials, again, with EDTA.

The most likely person to have dropped the bloody glove on Simpson's property was the cop who raced right over there after being relieved by other cops from the crime scene where he had been for a while alone with all the evidence. He pretty much guaranteed that the LAPD would have to fix things the next day as the EDTA showed they did.

As far as the race card goes, it was the lack of physical evidence as well as the physical evidence that didn't fit, together with a completely incompetent prosecution, that won the acquittal.