Posted on 03/28/2012 4:58:07 PM PDT by KevinDavis
Billions of potentially habitable planets may exist within our galaxy, the Milky Way, raising new prospects that life could exist near Earth, a study has found.
Researchers discovered that at least 100 of the ''super-Earths'' may be on our galactic doorstep, at distances of less than 30 light years, or about 180 trillion miles, from the sun.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
Over here!
(Thanks, KevinDavis)
Cheers!
Yea, too bad that Star Trek is fictional (that means not real) and we are lucky to get to Warp 0.000006.
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar · | ||
“I sometimes wonder how broad the definition of habitable is. Aside from gravity and atmosphere, how many of these planets can support the agriculture necessary to maintain human life?”
Agriculture? Get with the 21st century man. Everybody knows that food comes from stores.
we already have the artificial gravity(well spin a ship to make a 1 G centrifuge or with enough power, travel at a continuous 1 G, both accelerating and breaking, to simulate same...)
.....and with enough shielding radiation is no problem, as long as you have the power to push a heavily armored ship.
FTL.....ah. that's the problem. can we harness an Alcubierre bubble? or drill out a worm hole big enough to travel through??? Actually traveling FTL seems to be impossible...
Actually Project Daedelus dropped Barnards Star as a target and settled on Alpha C as a target of a 38 year trip.
I want to populate my planet with miners, loggers, and farmers.
—
What about commercial fishermen?
I actually thought about fishermen and decided that it might be better to wait to bring them in with a second wave of settlers after a little food production is built up.
No spaecraft will make it that far. Cosmic radiation bursts will kill off the crew, or low/no gravity will
—
No current craft. But a steerable version of Dyson’s Orion would easily overcome both problems. Was on drawing boards in the late 60s. Killed by Nixonian politics.
And yet, there’s not a peep out of any of ‘em...
The ship would have to be large enough to accommodate many generations - and food for hundred - if not thousands of years.... Propulsion isn't the only problem here...
Considering there are that many planets in this galaxy, coupled by the same number of galaxies, I find it completely impossible that we’re not alone in the universe. There are simply far too many planets for none of them to be occupied.
But there are theories that say those can't be done. /snark
Actually, the interstellar version was planned at 40 million tons (256 super tankers) with crew in the thousands. The smalller solar system versions were planned at 10 thousand tons with crew of 150.
Propulsion was never the problem - steering was.
As for size - the larger the ship, the better it worked,
Speed - time to Mars = 3 days.
All versions were planned to lift above the atmosphere before 1st nukes detonated. These were small bombs - the art of designing now lost in the USA.
Motto - Mars by 1965, Saturn by 1970.
Small version cost - same or less than Apollo.
Use wikipedia at your own risk.
They’re only theories.
Fishermen produce food - quicker than farmers who have to wait months for crop to come in. Fishermen need only supple materials to make nets or weirs - time to food is days or less.
Bring the farmers in the second wave. Because we aren’t going to have the time at first to muck about with the clearing acreage needed for crops.
the FTL stuff is only theories....that is a given.
not the artificial gravity simulation
nor the shielding..
How did the life get there? No one can explain scientifically how life got here.
If you buy random combination of chemicals, the odds of even the basic chemistry happening is something like 1 in 1040. I think Carl Sagan said that for even the most basic life you are talking about 1 in 10 2,000,000,000. If we are a random accident, it is on the cosmic scale, never to be repeated.
And the Drake equation could be written as N= assumption1*assumption2*assumption3*assumption...*assumption7. And we only have decent guesses at the first three assumptions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.