Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Elections have consequences...
1 posted on 03/04/2012 8:28:18 AM PST by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: null and void

Can we let the autopsy conclude first and until then, let the poor man rest in peace.


2 posted on 03/04/2012 8:29:16 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Why didn’t he have personal security?

Surely anyone making the claims that he did understands that they are targets.


4 posted on 03/04/2012 8:31:27 AM PST by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

If this is true, this would make Watergate, Iran Contra and the Tea-Pot scandal combined look like a petty crime in comparison.


5 posted on 03/04/2012 8:31:55 AM PST by Nowhere Man (Send Obama back to the ghetto, November 6th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void; Eaker; Absolutely Nobama; afnamvet; AK2KX; Ancesthntr; An Old Man; APatientMan; ...
Dear fellow FReepers,

Please read (and save) my damning "J'accuse" of the Obama regime, Murdergate, and the liberal media establishment.

Gangster Government, And Sakharov's Immunity.

I wrote it one day before the "death by natural causes" of Andrew Breitbart, while he was taking a walk alone near his home.

15 posted on 03/04/2012 8:36:42 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Really ridiculous post. Perhaps at least wait till the autopsy results are in before tossing out silly conspiracy theories?


16 posted on 03/04/2012 8:37:25 AM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

Soros global governance agenda was also threatened by sunlight from Breitbart, same with the unions. They need Obama and current establishment to thrive.


17 posted on 03/04/2012 8:37:53 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

We were told in the news that he died of natural causes. How did they know that?


19 posted on 03/04/2012 8:41:02 AM PST by bmwcyle (I am ready to serve Jesus on Earth because the GOP failed again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

I have it from a double-secret source that Breitbart was actually struck by a remnant fragment from comet Elenin.


22 posted on 03/04/2012 8:42:50 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

I was surprised to see this exact storyline on NBC’s “The Firm” (Chapter Nine) last night. A soldier returns home to find his son missing but knows that he is dead because he was on the phone with him at the time the son was ‘taken out’.

The soldier’s attempts to reach the truth were thwarted by the feds due to the ‘war on terror’ confidentiality. Who knows when any of us will be determined to be a terrorist and taken out without due process? The Constitution has died.


27 posted on 03/04/2012 8:44:42 AM PST by PuzzledInTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
As I posted a few days ago, what better way to defuse suspicion than to exploit a known pre existing condition?

I'm not saying either way what happened to AB, I'm just saying that if I wanted to eliminate someone and I already knew he had a heart condition, what better way to off him then to “move” his condition along at a faster pace?

28 posted on 03/04/2012 8:45:50 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Andrew Breitbart spent over a week in the hospital last year for heart related issues. This was confirmed by his #1 business partner. He had a history of heart problems.

He was a man that embraced and loved life, all aspects of it. He smoked too much, drank too much, tended towards corpulence and worked 20 hours a day.

‘The candle that burns twice as bright, burns half as long’ & Mr Breitbart burned as bright as a million candles.

He was not assassinated and any talk of that does a disservice to him and his adversaries.

30 posted on 03/04/2012 8:46:29 AM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Breitbart had heart problems, his friends were aware of it, and he had been advised to change his un-healthy lifestyle.

He continued to live a hectic lifestyle with little sleep and he died young.

His hard-to-process death is a great loss but to claim he was "murdered" with poison darts, etc., (on another thread) makes no sense. Is it logical to think the "killer" would have known he was going to be out walking at midnight?

How would security protect from poison darts anyway?

Peter and the Wolf!

35 posted on 03/04/2012 8:49:17 AM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

If ‘they’ did do it, ‘we’ will never know.

If ‘they’ didn’t do it, many will still believe it anyway.

IMHO, God took Andrew because it was his time to go.

Whether they did it or not, the real issue is how they try to take advantage of it.

With all due respect to the death of Andrew Breitbart.
“The brightest stars burn the fastest”.


46 posted on 03/04/2012 8:55:20 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

All that came to mind when I read that he had died while walking was Marilyn Monroe and her very convenient suicide and the many deaths during the Clinton years, Arkacides.


47 posted on 03/04/2012 8:57:16 AM PST by Dustbunny ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. " Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
No.

Much as I would love to see such a conspiracy exposed, Andrew's heart was a ticking time bomb.

And it detonated.

48 posted on 03/04/2012 8:57:21 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopaths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
The Obama regime has already PROVEN itself capable of planning and executing coldly murderous programs, like Operation Fast And Furious, AKA

MURDERGATE.

The legality or otherwise of assassinating Andrew Breitbart with a puff of "Instant Heart Attack" by a "passer by" would just be irrelevant.

49 posted on 03/04/2012 8:57:23 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
I watched NBC's The Firm last evening. The theme of the episode was the FISA court and the authorized killing of a US citizen.

It was interesting, and scary, to think this kind of thing might be going on.

The episode, Chapter Nine, is worth watching in light of this topic on NBC.com and may be on your local cable On Demand and on Hulu.com.

http://www.nbc.com/the-firm/video/chapter-nine/1388772/
72 posted on 03/04/2012 9:27:12 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
Laws are like sausages; you know the rest. Laws are structured to control the little people and many of them aren't legal. So, no, Breitbart could no have been murdered legally.

He may have died naturally BUT it is highly doubtful for two reasons:

1) The natural causes determination came out ridiculously fast.

2) All celebrity autopsies are complete and reported within 24 hours. The report is either the final determination or that toxicology reports have to come back before determination.

They've learned a lot since Vince Foster, just not enough.

81 posted on 03/04/2012 9:43:47 AM PST by Lady Jag (Laws are spider webs through which the big flies pass and the little ones get caught)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
What is missing from most commentaries on the subject of Breitbart's death/assassination is this: when a conspiracy theory seems not only plausible, but highly likely because of the current political environment, then the nation is at least only a step away from the theory being a reality.

Who does doubts that the current executive branch has no moral scruples in killing Andrew Breitbart? Who doubts that the media would just yawn if it were privately known by them? They would likely justify it as "a necessary evil to save the country from right-wingers who want to destroy Amerika."

We are there. No one cares that the son of a Kenyan is the ineligible, why would they care if his people did things the Chicago way on Andrew Breitbart? The truth will never be known, because no one wants to publicly admit it.
84 posted on 03/04/2012 9:51:39 AM PST by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void

86 posted on 03/04/2012 9:56:55 AM PST by InvisibleChurch ( go in peace , serve the Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson