To: null and void
Why didn’t he have personal security?
Surely anyone making the claims that he did understands that they are targets.
4 posted on
03/04/2012 8:31:27 AM PST by
COUNTrecount
(Barry...above his poi grade.)
To: COUNTrecount
Why didnt he have personal security? Surely anyone making the claims that he did understands that they are targets.
We'll never know. Perhaps he thought he was immune? Perhaps he couldn't afford it?
18 posted on
03/04/2012 8:38:35 AM PST by
null and void
(Day 1138 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
To: COUNTrecount
Why didnt he have personal security?
First question I asked when the news reports said “he was out walking alone and collapsed”, and a neighbor saw it and phoned 911. Where was his security detail? Or didn’t he have one? Inquiring minds want to know.
To: COUNTrecount
It burns me how our guys, and not the enemies of our republic need security for merely exercising their 1st Amendment rights. Coulter, Rush, Horowitz, . . . all take various measures. Where is the outrage? It is just accepted that conservatives should face physical danger.
I have never heard reference to security details for the Marxist mouthpieces bent on our destruction.
73 posted on
03/04/2012 9:28:15 AM PST by
Jacquerie
(No court will save us from ourselves.)
To: COUNTrecount
Why didnt he have personal security?
Maybe because his life wasn't in danger?
And since when do deaths by natural causes such as heart attacks require personal security anyway? Seems like a lot of money to spend on such when one doesn't know when they're going to die........Unless your talking about personal physicians hanging with him rather than security personnel.
179 posted on
03/04/2012 2:42:07 PM PST by
Hot Tabasco
(The only solution to this primary is a shoot out! Last person standing picks the candidate)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson