Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/09/2012 11:30:49 AM PST by bananaman22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: thackney; steelyourfaith

Ping.


2 posted on 01/09/2012 11:33:35 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

That’s all well and good but how much damage will be done to them by cleats; and are they as easy to repair/replace as sod?


3 posted on 01/09/2012 11:37:47 AM PST by WayneS (Comments now include 25% MORE sarcasm for no additional charge...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

This has the sound of a business plan that only makes sense from the standpoint of a state-run neo-fascist economy fed by endless amounts of cheap labor. Like China. Otherwise, giant batteries make no more sense than giant capacitors or giant windmills.


5 posted on 01/09/2012 11:42:04 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

This is interesting. It would be fun to amortize to 20 year total cost of ownership of a coal burning plant, a nuclear plant and a wind farm with these batteries. Let’s also factor in reliability and cost of power produced.

I suspect the wind farm (or solar farm) will still lose.


6 posted on 01/09/2012 11:44:18 AM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

There is a large wind farm on I-65 north of Indianapolis. Usually when we drive through virtually all the blades are turning. We were driving down from Chicago on the 1st of January on a particularly windy day and maybe one in ten was operating. I assumed they had batteries to store the excess power until I saw that.

It never dawned on me that batteries may be prohibitively expensive. Too bad they can’t sell excess power like Washington state does to California.


7 posted on 01/09/2012 11:45:24 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
A big problem with large scale storage is losses. How much in loss do you get say from taking Wind, putting it through storage and then back onto the grid? What is the percentage of loss?

I knew a storage facility in the 1970 call Crater Lake. Excess power was used to put water up to a mountain lake, then when needed though Hyrdo generators. Don't know how efficient that was. But how efficient would lake storage be in comparison to batteries? And how long would the storage last in comparison?

These are the engineering questions needed lest we have another Solyndra.

8 posted on 01/09/2012 11:46:03 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Let see pro football stadiums are used 16 weekends (plus a few playoff cames). For the other 330 days a year should we flood them and turn them into giant batteries. Great idea....


10 posted on 01/09/2012 11:47:22 AM PST by Quick Shot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
Footballl Pitch-Size battery?

Is the author taking about a kick-ball field size battery?

11 posted on 01/09/2012 11:48:22 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Liquid Thorium reactors..... We need them.


12 posted on 01/09/2012 11:49:29 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

“Trust Me” — green energy industry


13 posted on 01/09/2012 11:50:52 AM PST by pabianice (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

So wind power is even more expensive?


14 posted on 01/09/2012 11:57:57 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

The whole idea is DOA. Battery economics will never be able to overcome the drawbacks of battery physics. That is to say, the energy produced by ‘renewable’ resources will NEVER be able to overcome the cost of building, maintaining, and eventually disposing of and replacing the battery. ALL batteries are consumable, and you have to factor that cost into the entire picture.


15 posted on 01/09/2012 11:59:03 AM PST by rottndog (Be Prepared for what's coming AFTER America....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Great!
A giant football pitch sized battery that can go into a violent discharge state.
Wonder what that looks like?


17 posted on 01/09/2012 12:04:12 PM PST by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
The most abundant energy storage system in use around the world is the battery,

Actually the most efficient would be to have the wind turbines run a pump. Pump water up into a lake on top of a hill. Then use a hydroelectric plant to turn the stored energy into power at a steady rate. Batteries have a very low energy return rate for a given amount of energy put in. And they need to be replaced often. A storage lake, especially if it is also fed by a stream, could hold vast amounts of water for when you need power.
18 posted on 01/09/2012 12:05:44 PM PST by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
“So now that 100-MW wind farm can say, ‘We’re a 40-MW, steady-state, 24/7 energy source’—

BS

Show me a windfarm that runs at a 40% capacity factor.

More likely 25%.

Just another green company to short.

25 posted on 01/09/2012 12:17:04 PM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Batteries would just make it more expensive.


28 posted on 01/09/2012 12:57:07 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Futball (soccer) is played on a “pitch”. Football (American) is played on a field.

The pitch is somewhat larger than the field.


29 posted on 01/09/2012 12:57:45 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Islam is a tyrannical and violent POLITICAL ideology and has nothing to do with "religion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

“2011 saw huge advances in solar, wind and other renewable energy sources, “

What?!

Can anyone point me to a “huge advance” story that does NOT contain the words “could” or “might” or some similar qualifier? I don’t think so.


38 posted on 01/09/2012 1:36:52 PM PST by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

I follow this site on a regular basis and have noted they are very pro wind and solar energy. Go into their comments section and and it won’t take long to see who their audience is.

I find Fuel Fix, Institute for Energy Research and Rig Zone are better informed.


39 posted on 01/09/2012 1:36:56 PM PST by Recon Dad (Gas & Petroleum Junkie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Looking For Donors


Click The Pic

Are You One?

43 posted on 01/09/2012 1:50:27 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson