Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Two Diamonds Linked by Strange Quantum Entanglement
LiveScience ^ | Thursday, December 1, 2011 | Clara Moskowitz

Posted on 12/03/2011 9:19:07 AM PST by SunkenCiv

Scientists have linked two diamonds in a mysterious process called entanglement that is normally only seen on the quantum scale.

Entanglement is so weird that Einstein dubbed it "spooky action at a distance." It's a strange effect where one object gets connected to another so that even if they are separated by large distances, an action performed on one will affect the other. Entanglement usually occurs with subatomic particles, and was predicted by the theory of quantum mechanics, which governs the realm of the very small...

Because energy must be conserved in closed systems (where there's no input of outside energy), the researchers knew that the "lost" energy had been used in some way. In fact, the energy had been converted into vibrational motion for one of the diamonds (albeit motion that is too small to observe visually). However, the scientists had no way of knowing which diamond was vibrating.

Then, the researchers sent a second pulse of laser light through the now-vibrating system. This time, if the light emerged with a color of higher frequency, it meant it had gained the energy back by absorbing it from the diamond, stopping its vibration...

If the two diamonds weren't entangled, the researchers would expect each detector to register a changed laser beam about 50 percent of the time. It's similar to tossing a coin, where random chance would lead to heads about half the time and tails the other half the time on average.

Instead, because the two diamonds were linked, they found that one detector measured the change every time, and the other detector never fired. The two diamonds, it seemed, were so connected they reacted as a single entity, rather than two individual objects.

(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: diamonds; entanglement; quantumentanglement; quantumtheory; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: SunkenCiv
"The two diamonds, it seemed, were so connected they reacted as a single entity, rather than two individual objects"

This bothers me a bit. Are the two diamonds not reacting as a single system just because the split laser beam reaches them at exactly the same time? The experiment seems to be saying more about the laser than the diamonds. What if one of the diamonds was moved a cm. further sway so the laser hit it slightly later? Would the synchronized behavior then break down? I believe that other entanglement experiments have separated the members or isolated one and still seen entanglement. But I'm not so sure this one is an authentic example of the phenomenon. Or maybe the article's description is over-simplified and my misgivings were accounted for in the experimental design.

21 posted on 12/03/2011 9:59:17 AM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture (Could be worst in 40 years))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oberon; SunkenCiv
...and the operating principle of the Dirac phone has now been discovered.

Thanks for that;I was wracking my brain trying to remember the right term.

IIRC, it's same phenom Heinlein used to explain his twins' telepathy in Time for the Stars; I think it was A.E. van Vogt who used it extensively in some of his yarns.

I know it has also been postulated as an explaination for some paranormal phenomena many times.

22 posted on 12/03/2011 9:59:28 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (Made in America, by proud American citizens, in 1946...and thankful for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

i is so glad that i decided to give up particle physics to do precinct politics.

Now that I wanna give up politics, can I do precinct physics? or whatever.


23 posted on 12/03/2011 10:07:12 AM PST by campaignPete R-CT (I will go back to New Hampshire to campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

So that is what has been pulling my eyelids down.


24 posted on 12/03/2011 10:12:27 AM PST by mountainlion (I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

If progress continues, I can imagine what this will do for computing and communications in the next few decades.


25 posted on 12/03/2011 10:20:42 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

You thought the judge said “alimony”. No, he said “all-the-money”.


26 posted on 12/03/2011 10:20:56 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oberon

Yep, the first thing I thought of was the Ansibles.


27 posted on 12/03/2011 10:23:36 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Yeah, this is so huge I literally screamed out loud when I realized the implications. If something like this is mounted on a probe and sent out to Pluto, we could have the pictures with so little time delay that it would probably blow Einstein’s mind if he was alive today.


28 posted on 12/03/2011 10:26:16 AM PST by wastedyears (Not too long you devious little parathyroid. Soon I'll be rid of you and I'll be free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Waywardson
Col 1: 16-17 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

That sounds more like Chaos Theory than String Theory (although there are a lot of interrelationships [entanglements?] between the two).

29 posted on 12/03/2011 10:26:46 AM PST by freedumb2003 (Herman Cain 2012 -- the man we need at the time we need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

bflr


30 posted on 12/03/2011 10:29:46 AM PST by colinhester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clock King
The State could still make such tech illegal,....

My thinking is that would be a given, but the communication would be, for all practical purposes, undetectable, putting the state at a huge disadvantage.

And unless there is a way to make the tech very easily available to anyone, you can't just create entangled objects.

Every government has powerful enemies that would supply those willing to pay or subvert.

And your're right, it will take a genius to explain this.

31 posted on 12/03/2011 10:32:49 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Yeah, I have heard of this.....it’s called marriage.


32 posted on 12/03/2011 10:33:53 AM PST by Donkey Odious (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

I think it would take another species to explain this.

But then again I’m a huge fan of Ender’s Game.


33 posted on 12/03/2011 10:34:45 AM PST by wastedyears (Not too long you devious little parathyroid. Soon I'll be rid of you and I'll be free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

It would give us a heads-up when the buggers come.


34 posted on 12/03/2011 10:45:00 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
I think it would take another species to explain this.

I hope not, I would like to see humans rise to the challenge in thought understanding this depth of the physical universe represents.

But, then if the alien girls are cute and like old sailors, other than for food, well,...

35 posted on 12/03/2011 10:46:40 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Like the Orion slave girls?


36 posted on 12/03/2011 10:53:19 AM PST by wastedyears (Not too long you devious little parathyroid. Soon I'll be rid of you and I'll be free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Bflr


37 posted on 12/03/2011 11:34:46 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But have a plan to kill everyone you meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

IMO, Einstein wasn’t wrong, but he didn’t factor in that we live in a three-plus dimensional space, and what is “local” is accurate only in N-dimensions, however many those may be.


38 posted on 12/03/2011 11:43:55 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Alternately, our concept of dimension Time may yet be primitive, limited to a linear conceptualization, and thus unable to account for a real effect via the planar temporal connetion.


39 posted on 12/03/2011 12:00:30 PM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they cannot be deceived, it's impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

that looks like my screen saver....with the squiggles moving..


40 posted on 12/03/2011 12:22:17 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson