Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are 5in heels a step too far for women's health?
DailyMail ^ | 12th November 2011 | Eleanor Harding

Posted on 11/12/2011 11:43:43 AM PST by Daffynition

They may be the height of fashion – but the health risks will bring you back down to earth with a bump.

Five-inch heels are becoming the most sought-after shoes on the high street as shoppers take their lead from celebrities such as Victoria Beckham.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Health/Medicine; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: fashion; heels; highheels; shoes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last
To: Paved Paradise

The most comfortable shoes I had were my jungle boots..my combat boots were comfortable too as are my hiking boots..other than that I find good running shoes for normal running around.for dress up...something with a heel but no high heels unless I know I won’t have to do a lot of walking.


101 posted on 11/12/2011 1:30:18 PM PST by celtic gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Now that’s fascinating!! Those look just like pointe shoes for a ballet dancer...when I was starting to read the thread I thought—why not just put heels on toe shoes?


102 posted on 11/12/2011 1:31:36 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

If you have a 4” foot that could be a problem. Average length of a woman’s foot is 8-9 inches. A five inch heel is not dangerous.

It’s all in the math.

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh!


103 posted on 11/12/2011 1:31:46 PM PST by sodpoodle (Cain - touching the better angels of our nature. Newt - knowledge is power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raebie
Any thing....*ANY*thing can be taken too far. ;)


104 posted on 11/12/2011 1:32:32 PM PST by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: All
I can't believe we've made it this far...but have completely ignored the greatest shoe-invention since sliced bread.


105 posted on 11/12/2011 1:36:31 PM PST by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: floridarunner01
As someone who used to hear heels, but not absurdly high heels--I'd say those heels are less than four inches and more than three. I did go through the shoe-crazy stage, and I thought the most flattering heel height was 3.5 inches.

With a heel 3.5 inches, it lengthens and flatters the calf and pretty legs, without making you walk silly. You never see Sarah walk silly. I think those are 3.5.

You know what I hate? The "leg chair" that Fox bimbos sit on, with mini-skirts and these 5-inch fetish stilettos...embarrasses me. A long way we've come since "dress for success."

106 posted on 11/12/2011 1:36:31 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

That’s an interesting shot of the DHS Secretary’s legs...


107 posted on 11/12/2011 1:43:56 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Janet Reno?


108 posted on 11/12/2011 1:56:57 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

Well, it’s true, if you have to make a quick getaway, heels are not going to work for you. Although I must say, back in the day in New York, I have seen high-heel-wearing older ladies sprint for the bus in a way that would have left most Olympic atheletes in the dust! I think they’d been training in their heels for a number of years, though. LOL!


109 posted on 11/12/2011 1:57:35 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
Haha. My girlfriend can't stand that either on FOX. Notice how they always have a woman with heels on the side of a table that shows the most leg. She likes the shoes, but bugs the hell out of her the way they do that.


110 posted on 11/12/2011 2:01:23 PM PST by floridarunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

111 posted on 11/12/2011 2:04:36 PM PST by Bobalu (More rubble, less trouble)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
>>That’s an interesting shot of the DHS Secretary’s legs...<<

LOL

I recall the rebellious Kate Hepburn and her fashion sense and how it drove her handlers c-r-a-z-y. Heels and skirts weren't exactly her *thing.* :)


112 posted on 11/12/2011 2:07:24 PM PST by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

ha

That guy’s big toes are trying to turn into opposable thumbs.


113 posted on 11/12/2011 2:09:46 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: celtic gal

barefoot on deep pile carpet is probably as good as it gets.


114 posted on 11/12/2011 2:12:07 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
HAHAHA!

Peach-pickers, Georgia.


115 posted on 11/12/2011 2:13:16 PM PST by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Clarify my memory here, if you can.

I think the US government had a policy that they wanted to have a factory within the US that could manufacture each major necessity (shoes, pants, shirts, jackets, etc.).

I thought Bass Shoe or some other shop in Maine was THE last major shoe manufactory in the US that could meet those requirements and that they shifted their manufacturing overseas, so that there is no longer a single manufacturing facility that could supply the US with shoes during a major international issue (e.g., war).

Does that ring a bell or am I completely off on that? Do you know anything about that?


116 posted on 11/12/2011 2:16:19 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival. (Karl Denninger has jumped the shark. Do not visit his blog.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: momtothree
Back in the 50’s 4-5 inch stiletto heels were all gals wore. I know cause I wore them. If they were stilettos you were not it style.
117 posted on 11/12/2011 2:20:52 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

I’m pretty sure there are still one or two boot makers still operating in north america somewhere...but i could be wrong


118 posted on 11/12/2011 2:20:53 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; Daffynition

The slutty shoes in the 50’s were the one’s with an open heel. Easy to kick off before you jumped in bed,and that was from the male point of view back then...The kick um off quick shoe....LOL


119 posted on 11/12/2011 2:25:43 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Twinkie

One of the reasons I only wore a 2 inch heel (maybe pushing 3 in my much younger days) is because I am 5’8”. I’m not saying there is one thing wrong with a six foot gal but usually men had an issue with looking up to a woman. LOL!


120 posted on 11/12/2011 2:26:12 PM PST by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson