Skip to comments.
Astronomy Picture of the Day -- Asteroids Near Earth
NASA ^
| October 01, 2011
| (see photo credit)
Posted on 10/01/2011 5:27:51 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
Explanation: Though the sizes are not to scale, the Sun and planets of the inner solar system are shown in this illustration, where each red dot represents an asteroid. New results from NEOWISE, the infrared asteroid hunting portion of the WISE mission, are shown on the left compared to old population projections of mid-size or larger near-Earth asteroids from surveys at visible wavelengths. And the good news is, NEOWISE observations estimate there are 40 percent fewer near-Earth asteroids that are larger than 100 meters (330 feet), than indicated by visible light searches. Based on infrared imaging, the NEOWISE results are more accurate as well. Heated by the Sun, asteroids of the same size radiate the same amount of infrared light, but can reflect very different amounts of visible sunlight depending on how shiny their surface is, or their surface albedo. That effect can bias surveys based on optical observations. NEOWISE results reduce the estimated number of mid-size near-Earth asteroids from about 35,000 to 19,500, but the majority still remain undiscovered.
(Excerpt) Read more at 129.164.179.22 ...
TOPICS: Astronomy; Astronomy Picture of the Day; Science
KEYWORDS: apod; asteroids; astronomy; catastrophism; nasa; neowise; science; wise
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
10/01/2011 5:27:58 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
To: 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
2
posted on
10/01/2011 5:28:48 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: brytlea; cripplecreek; decimon; bigheadfred; KoRn; Grammy; married21; steelyourfaith; Mmogamer; ...
3
posted on
10/01/2011 5:29:13 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
Let me get this right... each red dot is an asteroid? Okay... is this the point where I go running and screaming?!! LOL!
To: SunkenCiv
Don’t call them “asteroids”.
They are potential retirement homes for The Lyin’ King and his cohorts come January 2013!
You may, however, call them “ASSteroids”.
To: SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
So the conclusion is (a) we get clobbered by an asteroid, (b) fried when our sun goes nova, or (c) swallowed by a black hole.
At least it puts a bad day in perspective.
7
posted on
10/01/2011 6:23:24 AM PDT
by
ixtl
( You live and learn. Or you don't live long.)
To: SunkenCiv
Old Model: We THINK many object could do major damage.
New Model: We are SURE there are objects that can do damage, just half of what we were guessing before.
8
posted on
10/01/2011 6:35:32 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
To: SunkenCiv
9
posted on
10/01/2011 6:47:39 AM PDT
by
Lawgvr1955
(You can never have too much cowbell !!)
To: SunkenCiv; momtothree
NEOWISE results reduce the estimated number of mid-size near-Earth asteroids from about 35,000 to 19,500, but the majority still remain undiscovered. Okay people. We reduced the number of what we think we were seeing to what we now think we are seeing, but the true number of what we think we should be seeing is actually much MUCH more.
Now you can go running and screaming.
To: SunkenCiv
OK, which ones are asteroids and which ones are planetoids?
Now that astronomers have created a category called "dwarf planets," does that mean that there are also "dwarf planetoids"? Or are those just meteoroids?
To: bigheadfred
President: Dan, we didn't see this thing coming?
Truman: Well, our object collision budget's about a million dollars a year. That allows us to track about three percent of the sky, and begging your pardon sir, but it's a big-a@% sky.
;)
12
posted on
10/01/2011 7:53:39 AM PDT
by
Renderofveils
(My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music. - Nabokov)
To: SunkenCiv
...and one of those puppies has our number on it.
13
posted on
10/01/2011 9:25:59 AM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: left that other site; SunkenCiv
Otherwise know as Hemorrhoids.
14
posted on
10/01/2011 9:27:50 AM PDT
by
PapaNew
To: bigheadfred; SunkenCiv
Thanks, Fred. That certainly cleared things up for me, and it's all down Pat now. ;-D
15
posted on
10/01/2011 9:29:13 AM PDT
by
TheOldLady
(FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
To: bigheadfred
“Now you can go running and screaming”.
Just waiting for the nod of the head! Aaaaaghhhaaaghhhh! LOL!
To: <1/1,000,000th%
17
posted on
10/01/2011 11:44:15 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: CodeToad; ixtl; bigheadfred; TheOldLady; momtothree
It’s amazing what gets found when these studies are done for reasons other than politics. :’) Previously a tiny study done in the 1990s showed that the estimates for big rocks in the vicinity was ten times too high, so there’s nothing to worry about, time to shift funding back to our programs. :’)
18
posted on
10/01/2011 11:46:53 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: left that other site; Lawgvr1955; Verginius Rufus; Renderofveils; PapaNew
19
posted on
10/01/2011 11:48:08 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: PapaNew
Many more than one, probably.
20
posted on
10/01/2011 11:48:41 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson