Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Darth Vader will lose a little more of his dignity in Star Wars original trilogy Blu-rays
io9 ^ | Wed 31 Aug 2011

Posted on 08/31/2011 10:02:37 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Darth Vader will lose a little more of his dignity in Star Wars original trilogy Blu-rays. Listen for yourself! George Lucas is not satisfied with turning the puppet Yoda in Star Wars: The Phantom Menace into a CG creation. Or just fixing some of the wonky lightsabre effects in the original trilogy. He's going a bit further.

Lucas had promised that fans would have a few new details here and there to notice in his newly remastered HD versions of his classic trilogy — and now the first details are leaking out. And fans are not happy. Some of the fans have gotten hold of the Blu-ray footage, and they're dissecting it at TheForce.net, the Blu-Ray.com forums and the DVDTalk forums. And a couple of changes to the soundtrack have already become apparent, at least if some recent leaks are to be believed.

UPDATE: Badass Digest says "a trusted source" confirms that these changes are real.

Most notably, "Vader now screams NOOOOOOOO when he throws the Emperor" in Return of the Jedi. And it sounds, quite frankly, kind of silly. Check out an mp3 of the new sound effect.

Update: One intrepid fan has synced this audio with the original video:

Second of all, when Obi-Wan scares off the Tusken Raiders from an unconscious Luke, we no longer hear Obi-Wan's famous "Krayyt Dragon" call, but instead it just sort of sounds like Walrus Man barfing. Check out an mp3 of the new version.

Update: Another intrepid fan has synced the leaked audio with the picture from a previous DVD release, via Slashfilm:

And then there's the new more realistic, blinking eyes on the Ewoks — see the clip at left featuring Wicket W. Warrick, which was sent to us by the same tipster who sent us the audio files of the new sound effects.

The fans are debating whether these leaks are real, with forum user JonYo writing:

Please, everyone remember that no matter how "reliable" certain sources are, the official release of the Blu Ray set is still a couple of weeks away, and until the final commercial release is in the hands of the public, anything leaked is suspect - including promotional material from Lucas. It's quite possible that we, the teeming masses of netnerds, are being messed with in regards to some of the "newly leaked" footage. The Ewok eyes, the crappy sabers, the various awkward screams...we're a highly excitable bunch right about now, and someone could very easily be having a laugh. Not saying this is the case, but it's quite possible.

Although user Gundark31 points out:

The leak came from China so the chances of this being legit is high.

In any case, with the new audio synced with the original video, it does seem to fit pretty well, and some fans even say they're okay with it once they see it in context.

What do you think — hoax or real? And is this new tinkering a huge deal-breaker, or just one more head-scratching Lucas decision? [Thanks Jon!]


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; TV/Movies; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: georgelucas; starwars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: shibumi

shibumi: “Movies should be left as they were made in the beginning.”

I wouldn’t go that far. Lucas could learn a thing or two from Ridley Scott and Blade Runner. Read the comments from thrilled fans who have FIVE versions to pick from, including the original theatrical release:

http://www.amazon.com/Runner-Five-Disc-Complete-Collectors-Blu-ray/dp/B000UBMWG4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1314862940&sr=8-1

Compare that to Lucas who simply refuses to give fans what we want (and is pretty snarky about it, too). Of course, he’s free to do whatever he wants with his movies, but he’s a jerk for not appreciating the fans and films that made him rich.


21 posted on 09/01/2011 12:52:12 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (What's special about bad? Bad is easy. Anyone can do bad. I prefer good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
What's next ? A rewrite of 1984 with the Tea Party standing in for the Inner Party ? Sigh....how the classics die many ugly deaths....
22 posted on 09/01/2011 12:58:33 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (Ron Paul is a just another CONgress Critter. Why else would he be in CONgress for 35 years ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

An honest Ringworld movie would be gold - or simply the Life and Times of Beowulf Shaeffer.

We’ll never get it though - not enough explosions.


23 posted on 09/01/2011 1:21:10 AM PDT by EnglishCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I know we aren’t supposed to hate, but...

I’m getting to were I really, REALLY hate Luca$ :(


24 posted on 09/01/2011 1:34:31 AM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EnglishCon

Having seen both, I must agree with your exception.


25 posted on 09/01/2011 1:50:56 AM PDT by shibumi (Goi! Rode, Goi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

I just wish that Lucas had left David Prowse to do Vader’s voice instead of bringing in James Earl Jones. Prowse has a broad Bristol accent which would have made Vader an entirely different character. A Bristol accent might not mean much to our American friends, but if you imagine it to be pretty much how you’d expect a pirate to speak, you’ve got a reasonable idea!

“Oi foinds yer lack of faith disturbing me old lover. . . .”

:D


26 posted on 09/01/2011 3:10:44 AM PDT by Caulkhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Caulkhead

The real problem with Vader’s voice was not the JEJ dubbing. It was trying to believe that that voice belonged to Hayden Christensen.

Turning Christensen into a Bristol Pirate might have been easier to take.


27 posted on 09/01/2011 3:27:00 AM PDT by shibumi (Goi! Rode, Goi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
jar jar binks - not a jedi Pictures, Images and Photos
28 posted on 09/01/2011 3:56:33 AM PDT by Morgana (I don't speak much...............but when I do....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EnglishCon
That's true. But that was a case of studio execs ruining a perfectly good film, and a director years later restoring it to its intended form.

Voice-over narration is always dicey, and Harrison Ford's flatline monotone simply didn't cut it. The best voice-over narration I've ever heard in film was Goodfellas. Ray Liotta especially did a magnificent job.

That said, just watched director's cut of Bladerunner the other day, and the movie is not holding up well for me. Maybe I've watched it too many times, but the movies I really love, I can watch an infinite number of times.

29 posted on 09/01/2011 4:46:53 AM PDT by Huck (I don't believe there is just one God--humanity seems like the work of a committee to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: chris37

I think ALL the Star Wars movies are good enough for kids. Once you grow up, you start to notice all the flaws. Sort of like the old tv show Land of the Lost. (Ok, a little better than that, but the acting is about the same).


30 posted on 09/01/2011 4:48:23 AM PDT by Huck (I don't believe there is just one God--humanity seems like the work of a committee to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

At least the Library of Congress has preserved Star Wars as it was in 1977. It may have The Empire Strikes Back as well.


31 posted on 09/01/2011 4:49:15 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Will racist demagogue Andre Carson be censured by the House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I want to see a modern day series from the E E “Doc” Smith series, Triplanetary and the space opera “Lensmen”.

Done properly Lensmen could out do the Star Wars series.

These are classic cult sci-fi from the late 40’s and 50’s, arguably when it was in its golden years.

I will buy the BD Star Wars set, better is good even if they continue dubbing and remaking it for the next 100 years.

Almost reminds me of how Obama is where he is now, his handlers didn’t like his past so the blue screened him a new one.


32 posted on 09/01/2011 4:58:40 AM PDT by Eye of Unk (Daniel J. Ramsey 1956-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheWriterTX
SW 4, 5, 6 were wonderful (sans Ewoks).

Ewoks. That alone should have been justification to bring back DDT...

33 posted on 09/01/2011 5:43:18 AM PDT by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Maybe they could take Anakin’s “Yippee!” from the Phantom Menace and dub it into Luke’s post-amputation jump from the catwalk in Cloud City.


34 posted on 09/01/2011 5:50:21 AM PDT by Sloth (If a tax break counts as "spending" then every time I don't rob a bank should be a "deposit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama
What's next ? A rewrite of 1984 with the Tea Party standing in for the Inner Party ? Sigh....how the classics die many ugly deaths....

My wife bought a cheap copy of "Animal Farm" from Amazon.com and when it arrived the cover was a drawing of George W Bush sitting at a desk. That wasn't shown on the Amazon page when she bought it.

35 posted on 09/01/2011 7:39:25 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

Still have the original trilogy (unaltered ) on laserdisc.


36 posted on 09/01/2011 8:43:10 AM PDT by magglepuss (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
Sad, isn't it ? Yet, as we all know, Animal Farm was written as a criticism of the Soviet Union. Ahhh.....the evil of revisionism.....
37 posted on 09/01/2011 8:46:40 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (Ron Paul is a just another CONgress Critter. Why else would he be in CONgress for 35 years ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Caulkhead
Prowse. Didn’t he play Frankenstein in some of the Hammer Horror Films?
38 posted on 09/01/2011 9:23:10 AM PDT by MotorCityBuck ( Keep the change, you filthy animal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheWriterTX
SW 4, 5, 6 were wonderful (sans Ewoks). SW 1, 2, 3 were painful to watch.

5 was excellent, 6 was close but had some major flaws. 4 is generally overrated because of its technical achievements.

Note that it's no coincidence that 5 was the only one where Lucas neither directed nor wrote the screenplay.

39 posted on 09/01/2011 9:27:05 AM PDT by kevkrom (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: boop

I loved that movie. It wasn’t until years later that I realized it was directed by a young Robert Zemeckis, who went on to much greater (if less wonderfully raunchy) things.


40 posted on 09/01/2011 10:52:29 AM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson