An important set of facts to know IN THE FACE OF the globalist commie’s depopulation goals and efforts.
Thx thx.
END TIMES PING.
BTW, What ever happened in that most famous Aussie case of “The Dingo Ate My Baby” claim?
Actually, a partial small group of the
END TIMES PING.
I dont believe that the worlds population is spiraling out of control and that it will will ultimately lead to catastrophic shortages of the essential resources necessary to sustain life.
I do believe that out of control Leftist, Liberal, Socialist, Progressive, Communist policies will ultimately lead to catastrophic shortages of the essential resources necessary to sustain life because of their proclivity to discourage entrepreneurship, work and creativity.
The desire and the will to improve ones lot in life is what spurs on civilization and continuous improvement of the human condition (I hate the Libs for making Progressive a word non-grata).
When government becomes the expected engine of the improvement of peoples day to day existence that progress of improvement will slow to a crawl. It will slow to the pace of bureaucracy.
bttt
Judging by what this last 100 million people have done to the quality of life in the United States, I prefer less population, and a better life, to learning to adjust to an ever growing, never ending, crush of humanity.
We aren’t farm animals that merely need food, water and shelter, we want to breathe, we want our children to be able to fish, hunt, camp and play within a bicycle ride or short drive of their city home.
Going outdoors shouldn’t be a travel trip. I grew up in a big city, Houston, and now I think of that childhood as almost like living in the country compared to today. Now even traveling from city to city is like commuting on a long urban route of non stop humanity and development.
If Wirth & Co. are so worried about overpopulation, why are our borders open to all and sundry? Why are we forced to accept 1 million legal immigrants a year? This story doesn’t compute.
Of course, there's only a limited supply of land so the dubious assumption does seem to be common-sensical. But, increases in wealth provide the capital base for improved food production due to technical advances.
If we wanted to, anyone with a house could have a backyard fish farm and eat the fish; agricultural technology has gone that far. Prey animals grow at an exponential rate too.
Soylent Green is people!
If my math is correct:
The world’s population could fit in the state of Rhode Island giving each person a 2 foot square to stand in.
The world’s population could live in the state of Texas if you grouped everyone in families of 4, with 75 acres, and a 1500 square foot house.
You could feed the world with produce grown in the valleys of California. (If you grew the right kind of produce.)
Overpopulation of the world is a lie too often propagated by those with ulterior motives.
****Present fertility rates actually indicate a massive underpopulation crisis is coming, particularly among Western nations.****
Not sure ‘fertility’ rates can be quantified - but contraception, abortion and copulation between same-sex species has got to reduce offspring.
The truth is Welfare Queens are over-populating the Earth. They typically have anywhere from 3-11 children we get stuck paying for.
I would be happier if we had fewer people and less crowding.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
marker
"if you accept the truth of our origins as revealed in Scripture then you have a moral and ethical system in which all human life is equally valuable regardless of our differences.
"The personal disposition of the Christian to Muslim people is always and forever one of love, hope, and charity regardless of what the Muslim may think or do. There is simply no other way to read the Scriptures: Bless those who curse you (Luke 6:28), Love your enemies (Luke 6:27"
I wonder what Michael Craven's view is on immigration reform. Welcome all with open arms?
bump for later reading