"Yes, citizen; we do consider elderly labs a threat; however, even though we damaged your property, we're not going to pay for damages erroneously delivered. Isn't it great to be IN CHARGE? Well, we suppose you wouldn't know, citizen."
1 posted on
05/10/2011 5:26:55 PM PDT by
Immerito
To: Immerito
Not even safe in your own gated yard.
2 posted on
05/10/2011 5:30:02 PM PDT by
SJSAMPLE
To: Immerito
Bruce, lunged at him, he said, so he shot the dog near its left eye. Too bad dogs can't shoot back like we can.
5 posted on
05/10/2011 5:33:54 PM PDT by
Las Vegas Ron
(Woah, Obama will appease Trump, but not Lakin? Thanks LSM)
To: Immerito
Fire a shot into my yard - especially at my dog - and I won't look for a badge. I will consider you an imminent threat to my life, and go for a head shot. We'll argue about the 4th Amendment later.

"But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: for men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away, for his name is Obama."
6 posted on
05/10/2011 5:34:54 PM PDT by
Viking2002
(RELEASE THE KRAKEN!!!!!!)
To: Immerito
I think shooting a dog is customary.
Cops have the power to violate your property and shoot your dog in the left eye, but USA cannot violate Bin Laden’s property and shoot him in between his eyes. Strange times.
7 posted on
05/10/2011 5:35:52 PM PDT by
sagar
To: Immerito
the city is not responsible for property damage Since when? You mean the government has free rule to wreck your house without so much as fair compensation?
10 posted on
05/10/2011 5:40:49 PM PDT by
OrangeHoof
(Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
To: Immerito
Did cops killing dogs only recently become newsworthy, or did cops manage to survive for years and years up until fairly recently without killing family pets?
16 posted on
05/10/2011 6:05:33 PM PDT by
andyk
(Wealth != Income)
To: Immerito
LEO’s had better get their heads out of their asses and get some training in animal behavior. This horseshit has got to stop.
18 posted on
05/10/2011 6:16:54 PM PDT by
EdReform
(Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
To: Immerito
Tough choice for a police officer......But did the dog have physical contact with the officer ?
The officer’s doing his job. But the dog’s doing his job as well.......The human - and presummably rational half of this event - needs must recognize he’s the “invader” into the dog’s territory. It may be the seond such experience in a short time frame confounded by lights’ sirens, stressed human voices to which the dog is sensitive.
Too many folks are completely ignorant of dog behaviors that are ingrained. Worse a lot of “pet owners” ignorantly or intentionally manipulate a dog’s innate responses in ways creating behavorial conflicts. >PS
To: Immerito

"Donuts are property too and we're not responsible for donut damage."
To: AnAmericanMother; Titan Magroyne; Badeye; Shannon; SandRat; arbooz; potlatch; metmom; ...
WOOOF!
The Doggie Ping list is for FReepers who would like to be notified of threads relating to all things canid. If you would like to join the Doggie Ping Pack (or be unleashed from it), FReemail me.
30 posted on
05/11/2011 6:28:59 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Immerito
I have SECURITY DOG and BEWARE OF DOG signs on my 10 ft wrought iron fence. That is meant to warn off potential burglars and the signs are an abject lie. I have 3 Jack Russel Terrorist and a big fat lazy hound dog. I worry that police or firemen would take the signs at face value and kill my pups. The only real danger from my dogs is if a police or fireman had a sandwich in his pocket. The dogs would take him down and lick him horribly until he gave up the sandwich.
31 posted on
05/11/2011 7:17:55 AM PDT by
Ditter
To: Immerito
Well, if they consider dogs property does this mean they cannot pass laws that tell you what you can do with them, ie, mandatory spay/neuter? I bet not....
37 posted on
05/11/2011 10:17:45 AM PDT by
brytlea
(Trying to think of something worth the waste of a keystroke...)
To: Immerito
As usual, not much info:
When the officer got to the open gate, Hernendez's 9-year-old Labrador retriever, Bruce, lunged at him, he said, so he shot the dog near its left eye. but the usual suspects are out in force. From this it would appear that the dog lunged, the cop shot. Maybe bad policework, I don't know, but I wasn't there. We have a lot of instant experts here on FR and a lot of Police Haters. I really am beginning to think we have some FReepers who must have a reason to have law enforcement. I love dogs, but if a big lab lunged at me, I might consider it an attack. Who knows, that's not much info to go on. Was the dog justified? Well, yeah, it was his yard, but does that mean any human in his right mind just sits back and gets bitten? BTW lots of labs WILL BITE. At one point they were number one time they were ranked number one in bites.
40 posted on
05/11/2011 10:34:28 AM PDT by
brytlea
(Trying to think of something worth the waste of a keystroke...)
To: Immerito
Terrible story. Hope the dog heals well.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson