Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laser cannon set to blind pirates
BBC ^ | January 10, 2011 | Unknown

Posted on 01/10/2011 1:24:50 PM PST by decimon

Sailors may soon have a weapon in their battle against sea-borne raiders: an anti-pirate laser.

BAE Systems has demonstrated its new laser system, which can temporarily blind would-be attackers.

The system would prevent pirates from being able to aim their weapons at targets, BAE claims.

But further safety testing is needed before such a system could be commercially deployed.

BAE said it has developed a low-cost laser distraction system that can travel through the sea air while being housed onboard a moving ship.

At distances of more than of between 1.2km (0.75 miles) and 1.5km (0.85 miles), the laser beam acts as a warning signal, letting the pirates know they've been spotted, said Brian Hore of BAE.

"Today's pirates tend to be opportunistic. If they know they've been spotted, they're likely to look for an alternative target," he told BBC News.

>

Green lasers - which have been shown to interfere with eyesight - have been used by the US military in Iraq and to temporarily blind targets.

>

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Conan the Conservative

Just wait until a pirate hires a personal injury lawyer.
As for “laser cannon”, another journalist knows not what he talks about.
The spotting laser should be followed by a well placed round. Make the pirate into shark food. The sea equivalent of shoot, shovel, shut up.


21 posted on 01/10/2011 1:37:30 PM PST by Fred Hayek (FUBO! I salute you with the soles of my shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: therightliveswithus

Why not use a water cannon to fill up their boat with water?


22 posted on 01/10/2011 1:37:52 PM PST by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Why not just kill them.


23 posted on 01/10/2011 1:38:29 PM PST by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Better yet would be a laser beam that's ridden by a 155mm Copperhead round.


24 posted on 01/10/2011 1:39:44 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

Scott: Why don’t you just kill him?
Dr. Evil: No, Scott, I have a better idea. I’m going to place him in an easily escapable situation involving an overly elaborate and exotic death.
Scott: Why don’t you shoot him now? I mean, come on, I’ll go get a gun. We’ll shoot ‘im together. It’ll be fun. BANG! Dead. Done.
Dr. Evil: One more peep out of you and you are grounded, mister! And I am not joking!


25 posted on 01/10/2011 1:40:08 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: decimon
The first contact with Muslims the US had was the Barbary Pirates after the American Revolution. We haven't learned much have we?
26 posted on 01/10/2011 1:41:32 PM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Hayek
Just wait until a pirate hires a personal injury lawyer.

Yep, a dead pirate in the bellies of several sharks won't be hiring any lawyers. Those who run the ships they're attacking need to make the cost of being a pirate so high that all but the most foolhardy, and soon to die, will find something else to do.
27 posted on 01/10/2011 1:42:58 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Yarr Cat
28 posted on 01/10/2011 1:43:48 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jolla
Water cannons under auto/remote control override by motion sensor video scanners to alert crew.

That would be too cheap & effective (too much fun as well, we all love waterguns).

29 posted on 01/10/2011 1:53:03 PM PST by de.rm (Bang, bang, . . bang. Shhh=Bush, the elder, E. Howard Hunt, LBJ, Mrs, Edgar Hoover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jolla

I have a canon but it’s an ink jet.


30 posted on 01/10/2011 1:57:26 PM PST by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: IM2MAD
No problem, we all know the pen is mightier than the sword.
31 posted on 01/10/2011 2:01:08 PM PST by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
Why not just get a 20-mm cannon and blast them all to hell?

They have those mounted on helicopters. The Coast Guard uses them as well as the Navy.

However, the only thing they are allowed to target is the engines of the target craft.

32 posted on 01/10/2011 2:03:43 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Tyrants flourish only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Remeinds me of the "courtesy visit" of the Schleswig-Holstein to Danzig in August 1939.
33 posted on 01/10/2011 2:06:30 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Socialists are to economics what circle squarers are to math; undaunted by reason or derision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: decimon

how about instead of a laser canon, we use a canon???


34 posted on 01/10/2011 2:16:38 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deaf Smith

What about an `autodarkening’ welder’s helmet lens? You see daylight through it until you strike an arc when it darkens to factor 15 in 1/10,000 sec. Stop a laser?

Fully armed seagoing mercs with attitude toward pirates are far more effective and permanent in effect, IMO.


35 posted on 01/10/2011 2:20:10 PM PST by elcid1970 ("No Islam, no terror!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

Just make sure they are Israeli spy sharks. With friggin’ laser beams on their heads.

Bwahahahahaha, ARRRRRRR!


36 posted on 01/10/2011 2:37:26 PM PST by West Texas Chuck (Eat the young, 100 million guppies can't be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: decimon

37 posted on 01/10/2011 2:48:00 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

38 posted on 01/10/2011 2:48:00 PM PST by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

unsuccesful LASIK patient?


39 posted on 01/10/2011 3:46:12 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: decimon
My favorite blinders...


40 posted on 01/10/2011 4:35:07 PM PST by Daffynition ( Live EACH DAY as if it were your last, but EXPECT that there still may be a tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson