Posted on 01/10/2011 5:28:26 AM PST by surroundedbyblue
So after Sheriff Dupnik running his mouth about the shooter being incited by "vitriol" coming from cable news & radio, I started worrying about law enforcement having possession of this guy's computer. There is a clear effort being made by many, many people to blame this on the conservatives in this country. I'm not accusing anyone of anything but the thought crossed my mind that could someone "plant" evidence on his computer that he was following Glenn Beck, Palin, etc? Or am I just a tin foil hat freak???
A lot of how law enforcement will approach this case will result from the tone set by Giffords, once she is back in control of her capacities (praying that she recovers fully).
It will be a great credit to her if she acknowledges that this was the work of a deeply disturbed individual and leave it at that. It will not go over well if she tries to score political points over it - and I don’t think she will.
It's already known that he was a leftist. Even if someone altered his files in any meaningful way, they couldn't alter the trail he's left on the Internet.
Someone in possession of your computer could easily alter it, but not the time-stamps of your history on FreeRepublic's servers, for instance. Nor Google's cache of it.
They'll have absolutely no problem blaming the right just like they don't have a problem blaming the 6 plus inches of snow that we're getting in South Carolina today on global warming.
“Thoughts?”
___________
I think your post is paranoid and selfish. Sounds like the sort of thing that a person who is wrought with some sort of guilt might post.
Maybe we should remember that Americans, including a young girl has been gunned down and maybe we should be thinking more about injured countrymen and less about promoting or protecting an ideology.
“feds have total control of all the information”
Hi.
Ahhh, “The Net” Redux. Or, “Shooter.” (Disclaimer: both are movies)
This is probably due to the fact that a federal judge was among those murdered. Don't be surprised if the venue is changed. Times have definitely changed. Back in 1979 when Judge Wood was assassinated by Woody Harrelson's father, the federal courthouse where the trial was held was renamed in honor of Judge Wood before the trial.
“I still have the shovel.”
Seems that they learned something from the Oklahoma city bombing. They can’t count on local jusges to go along with the agenda.
Here in Michigan they had to get rid of a Clinton appointed judge in the Hutaree case because she said the feds had no case.
The feds are already changing the story on the Judge’s appearance at the Giffords rally.
The Judge needs to be on official duty for the federal charges.
First the Judge was just stopping by to say hello when he saw that she was having a rally.
Next they say he was there to discuss the increased border assaults.
Next story line was that he was concerned that there were too many arrests by ICE and his workload was too heavy.
You can see the progression of lies in order to reach a particular conclusion.
Doubtful anyone know how the Judge came to be there but that won’t stop the O justice department.
“Note to self: Add a few kooky left wing sites to favorites and visit daily.”
Is there any such thing on radio, or are you referring to online sites?
I thought Airhead America went belly up long ago.
There is no way that I will defile my computer with Marxist sites. I have PJ to do that for me, as I am also a charter member of DUmmie funnies.
I just can not find a condom to fit my laptop ;)
Maybe luck will show he used Carbonite, but then the Liberal media will blame Limbaugh.
I think they said the FBI took over, so it would be with them.
LOL. Unless one thinks the “Uh” is a renegade Time Lord or some other space alien...
I wasn't aware of this. Judge Woods was not on official duty when shot in '79 by Harrelson. Is this a new law?
>>>>They are certainly doing whatever they can to hang this on the Tea Party.
The medias was ready to do that before Loughner’s first round exited the weapon barrel.
A so called legal expert made this comment yesterday.
I take everything said by ‘experts’ with a grain of salt.
Since the story about his appearance changed several times during the day it seemed to make sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.