Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Answering alarm, Oakland police kill family dog
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | October 1, 2010 | Carolyn Jones

Posted on 10/01/2010 3:37:26 PM PDT by triumphant values

(09-30) 18:25 PDT OAKLAND -- Mary Kate Hallock arrived at her Oakland hills home after running errands Tuesday and found a blue note fluttering on her front door.

"Oakland police responded to your residence to investigate a burglar alarm," the handwritten note read. "While circling the rear perimeter, lab advanced on officers in a threatening manner before being shot and killed."

"Lab" was Gloria, an 11-year-old, arthritic yellow Labrador Hallock's family had owned since she was a puppy. Oakland police shot Gloria three times with a 40-caliber Glock handgun in the family's backyard while responding to a false burglar alarm at the property. The dog, police said, growled and barked at them.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/10/01/BA341FMDDO.DTL#ixzz119HrrD77

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Local News; Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: beserkcop; donutwatch; leo; police
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 10/01/2010 3:37:28 PM PDT by triumphant values
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

No dog is safe.


2 posted on 10/01/2010 3:38:48 PM PDT by LowTaxesEqualProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

Yellow labs can be dangerous predators!

3 posted on 10/01/2010 3:40:05 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

ocop@oaklandnet.com


4 posted on 10/01/2010 3:40:59 PM PDT by Shannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualProsperity

This has to have become policy in many departments.

These reports have become routine, and in many scattered jurisdictions.


5 posted on 10/01/2010 3:42:37 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Detente with the GOP nomenklatura - trust, but verify.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

That’s just a shame. C’mon cops.

One dog does not present a life threatening situation. Shooting it was totally uncalled for, and I hope this sorry excuse for a police officer gets his ass canned.

What a punk/punkette.


6 posted on 10/01/2010 3:43:01 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

WTF is it with these ass*** cops shooting pets

can’t they use a catch pole or they too ***** stupid ?


7 posted on 10/01/2010 3:44:28 PM PDT by Charlespg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualProsperity

I’m afraid that if police don’t change their ways, I’m rooting for the homeowner that loses it and drops a few of them.


8 posted on 10/01/2010 3:45:03 PM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (Proudly casting a heavy carbon footprint as I clean my guns ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualProsperity
What I want to know is how do the other 298 million legal Americans, some of us who carry concealed 24/7/365, manage to get by day after day without shooting our neighbors' dogs.

How many dogs did the FedEx, UPS, ComEd, water meter readers and mailmen have to shoot today?

9 posted on 10/01/2010 3:45:11 PM PDT by triumphant values (Never criticize that to your right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

no riots cause the dog was white (yellow).


10 posted on 10/01/2010 3:49:08 PM PDT by sappy (criminallibs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
This has to have become policy in many departments. These reports have become routine, and in many scattered jurisdictions.

Yep. Which means there is a coordinated, national police policy of slaughtering family dogs whenever even remotely feasible.

To protect police? Hardly.

To enrage and frighten the population? How is such an effect avoidable?

The questions are, who wants that effect - and why?

11 posted on 10/01/2010 3:49:08 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

An 11 year old arthritic female lab? No threat whatsoever.

Fire these roidheads and fire them now. They have no business even wearing a badge and clearly like to play with their guns inappropriately.


12 posted on 10/01/2010 3:51:49 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

People should shoot back.


13 posted on 10/01/2010 3:55:24 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
Yep. Which means there is a coordinated, national police policy of slaughtering family dogs whenever even remotely feasible. To protect police? Hardly.

Police are not willing to risk injury. Police depts don't like paying workmens comp over one of their cops getting bit. Shooting the dog is costless to the police. Perhaps that should change?

14 posted on 10/01/2010 3:56:31 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
The dog, police said, growled and barked at them.

There is powerful pepper spray on the market, that will easily disable an aggressive dog.

I am usually on the side of the police, but this post has been self edited, if you get my meaning.

STE=Q

15 posted on 10/01/2010 3:56:45 PM PDT by STE=Q ("It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government" ... Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

They manage to use beanbags for humans, why do they have to shoot an innocent, elderly dog protecting her territory, no doubt? GAAHH!!! Poor dear thing.


16 posted on 10/01/2010 3:56:50 PM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitterohiogunclinger

As local LEOs become more and more militarized with all of the latest SWAT toys, we’re going to see more and more excesses. I have nothing but contempt for any cop that shoots a harmless family pet. Anything they get back by way of retribution is justified.


17 posted on 10/01/2010 3:57:18 PM PDT by Czar (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values
"Oakland police responded to your residence to investigate a burglar alarm," the handwritten note read. "While circling the rear perimeter, lab advanced on officers in a threatening manner before being shot and killed."

Might be better to disconnect the alarm system and get burgled. Perhaps the burglars will simply take a television or the silver, and not murder family members (and yes, dogs and cats are family members to millions of Americans).

Imagine coming home to your dog dead in the yard and that callous note on your door. I was raised to respect and trust police officers, but the plethora of these stories has made me begin to fear their presence for fear of my pets being killed.
18 posted on 10/01/2010 3:57:45 PM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualProsperity

Wait a second.. I thought the Oakland PD wasn’t responding to burglar alarms anymore? Or even a confirmed robbery in progress? Or do they only answer the calls if there’s a family dog available...?


19 posted on 10/01/2010 3:58:09 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

I’d wager I could have had this pup wiggling and face licking in a half minute of dog “sweet talking”. It isn’t rocket science.

These cops sound like the “GET ON THE GROUND” screamer types.


20 posted on 10/01/2010 3:59:57 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Live jubtabulously!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson