Posted on 10/01/2010 8:13:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Harvard Professor Raj Chetty and a group of other researchers have performed a much-discussed study (via Gene Expression) that looks at what factors really affect things like income, your likelihood to own a home, and odds of getting married.
The most startling thing they found?
Your score on a very basic kindergarten test is a HUGE predictor. Other educational factors like class size and the quality of your teachers aren't nearly as important.
Given the renewed interest in educational policy in America right now, it's fascinating.
(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...
I think this one summarizes the risk in rushing to post and delivering a FAIL.
http://www.akacrasher.com/stuff/FAIL/tank_fail.jpg
I try to do my part ;-)
Also, how many times have I discovered that my kids miss simple math problems because they added, when they should have subtracted and vice versa.
I keep trying to pound in their heads to read questions thoroughly and not assume anything, but it hasn’t quite sunk in, they just want to race through things (just like their old man back in the day)
LOL!
I do believe you hold the #1 position on FR for “I’d hit it!”
... and deservedly so.
OMG, I thought that was a propeller.
Hmm...lessee, “cup” - I give up. Is it the rocket ship, the eagle, or the rowboat?
I also created the phrase: GBLWHI (prounounced Gibble-whee), which means, "GUILTY, BUT LAZ WOULD HIT IT!"
I took a Boeing drafting course at a local technical college back in the mid 1970’s. One other guy and I were the math whizes in the class. We could work through the “tests” significantly faster than the rest of the class.However, whenever we did simple addition with large numbers like 33459 + 55483 + 3423 + 668594 = ?
He and I made more mistakes than anyone else. It was actually discussed in the class and I learned something from it. He and I did not bother to write down the numbers we carried and trusted our memory. Yeah, it worked most of the time, but not always. Others would take much longer (sometimes significantly so) to complete the tests, but they would often have more right answers than us.
The funny thing is that wrighting down the carried numbers doesn’t take all that long. I learned to be careful about taking short cuts.
That said, I am 56 and to this day I am STILL very much like the Hare in the story of the Hare and the Tortoise. It’s become my lifestyle. I’m jut careful not to “goof off too long” like the hare did. The sad thing is, think what I could have done if I attacked everything the way the Tortoise did and had the speed of the hare.
It seems we all have a fatal flaw that keeps us from the greatness. If it’s not one thing it is another.
LOL...More Epic fail pics to follow:
>>Um, I thought the pencil was a crayon so I was stumped.<<
Cracks me up. I thought the ship was a boat. It stumped me for a bit too.
Those of us who are pre-2000 have a special appreciation for the conversation here ;-)
I honestly think that question is about ones ability to take the time to listen, comprehend, and then accurately follow instructions.
Don’t sweat it, we all duk > kup sometime!
I probably “duk” “kupped” this reply!
Wrighting. Haha! I used to laugh when people typed “to” when they meant “too” . I thought it meant they didn’t know the difference. Then I caught myself doing it. I’ve discovered, after over a decade of posting on the internet, that I catch myself often typing out words phonically even though I know how to spell them. I type “ov” constantly when I mean “of”.
Excuses, excuses....snicker... I have no idea of what you are talking about, so here is a pigeon with a dart in it's head!
Laz, I’m gonna be dead from laughter soon if I keep looking at your posts. ROFL
That would be a great test at the next committee meeting in any company. Can you just envision a bunch of ambitious go-getters immediately standing up and patting their heads?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Lazamataz+I’d+hit+it&btnG=Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
About 2,570 results (0.39 seconds)
I've had to re-learn that lesson since my wife and I started square-dancing. The three cardinal rules of square-dancing are: know your right from your left, know if you're male or female, and never trust the caller to be consistent ...
The caller will call the same routine twice and then, on the third time, change one of the calls. Those in the square that were paying attention will do the routine correctly; those who were running on autopilot will repeat the incorrect routine. That, of course, leads to the breakdown of the square ...
I had my epic fail on night and ended up in a completely different square ...
... dancing with the guy in the kilt ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.