Posted on 09/02/2010 11:10:21 AM PDT by STARWISE
Edited on 09/02/2010 11:12:11 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
(Excerpt) Read more at wjz.com ...
#&^(%&#^@$(*(&$!#$!#@#$^&#$!!!!!
Yeah? Steak dinner, at Mortons, to you, or the first Birther who posts the text of the Article in the United States Constitution that gives the Army the final say in determining who the President of the United States is.
No he can't; no civilian court has jurisdiction to collaterally attack a decision of a court martial.
If Kalid Sheik Mohammed can get a trial in civilian court ... why not Mr. Lakin?Mohammed is scheduled to have a criminal trial in a civilian court. If he is convicted in that case, he will not be able to bring a civil suit "for fraud and damages."
Ping
Judge to Lakin: Find another defense
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=198465
Lind, who took 40 minutes to read her decision to the courtroom, disagreed.
She said opening up such evidence could be an “embarrassment” to the president and anyway, it should be Congress that would call for impeachment of a sitting president.
No, Jean S .. I wasn’t aware of that.
Shall you or I advise the Mod to remove that
link in post #166? Please advise direction,
should you happen know. Thanks.
>Do you by any chance happen to know if any of the politicians who helped get him into the Oval Office can also be prosecuted, and if so.... what type of sentencing would they possibly be subject to?<
The only one would be nazi pelosi who certified his vetting. She COULD be charged with submitting a false statement. But again she would have multiple defenses. Conviction highly unlikely
This is a stupid challenge. Power is inherent to the people via the Constitution, as it is a compact of “We the People.” Nothing limits that power from existing within persons in the Army. After all, it is the People after all who provide for the common defence, also per the Constitution.
This is so ridiculous I’m thinking the judge is sending a message. Anyone else think so?
I should have known I was wrong when I thought something you posted made sense : )
So, having apparently dispaired of litigating BO out of office, you now plan to have the Chief Executive deposed by the Exeutive Branch. Interesting. Care to share your thoughts on the mechanics of how that will done?
“Yeah? Steak dinner, at Mortons, to you, or the first Birther who posts the text of the Article in the United States Constitution that gives the Army the final say in determining who the President of the United States is.”
‘’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’
They dont, the Constitution does! That is what is at stake here.
>>So any attempt to remove him from office will be ugly!<<
>The uglier the better. Let’s get ‘er done.<
As much as I would like to see him leave / be removed it wont happen by this congress or even the next. The reason is this. With poll numbers the way that they are being so low in favor of both parties, they would be cutting their own throats admitting that they deceived the public and created this problem to begin with. Their poll numbers would be around zero. No confidence in congress would remain at all.
Democrats could not place blame on anyone and republicans would have to show that they were complicate.
What will come of this is that Obama will never run again. he will probably remove himself from office before the end of his term by 6 months or so would be my best guess.
But for anyone in congress to admit that they allowed this to happen would be about the same as slitting their own throats and take everyone down with them in the process. I can’t see it happening in this world can you?
Delusional and uniformed? That would be you. Here is an example how correct I am:
First the war deployment orders come from Obama. You'll also notice that the Secretary of Defense takes that order from Obama (echoes it) by signing the war deployment orders as it says in the article. This same order goes all the way down the chain-of-command to deploy to the E-1 Army private that originally came from Obama.
Lakin went through the proper channels, and still is to this day.
I had no idea they threatened to tazer him on his way to the nut floor at Walter Reed.
God bless you Soldier!
When this gets to SCOTUS, if they agree to hear it (if they don’t, that’s a whole ‘nother stinking pile of expletive), would there be a mechanism to get Kagin and Sotomayor to recuse themselves?
Anyone know?
But a Citizen can sue a president for Fraud. We saw Paula Jones sue a president for sexual harrasment.
Fraud is crime. Lakin will have damages.
http://mobile.twitter.com/searches?q=lakin
Sometimes it reminds me of playing the game "Telephone" as a child, I notice that someone is now tweeting that the judge dismissed the case because it might embarress OBAMA.
lol!! :-)
Yup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.