Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The strange case of solar flares and radioactive elements
Stanford University ^ | August 23, 2010 | DAN STOBER

Posted on 08/25/2010 8:59:18 AM PDT by decimon

When researchers found an unusual linkage between solar flares and the inner life of radioactive elements on Earth, it touched off a scientific detective investigation that could end up protecting the lives of space-walking astronauts and maybe rewriting some of the assumptions of physics.

>

Checking data collected at Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island and the Federal Physical and Technical Institute in Germany, they came across something even more surprising: long-term observation of the decay rate of silicon-32 and radium-226 seemed to show a small seasonal variation. The decay rate was ever so slightly faster in winter than in summer.

>

On Dec 13, 2006, the sun itself provided a crucial clue, when a solar flare sent a stream of particles and radiation toward Earth. Purdue nuclear engineer Jere Jenkins, while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare.

If this apparent relationship between flares and decay rates proves true, it could lead to a method of predicting solar flares prior to their occurrence, which could help prevent damage to satellites and electric grids, as well as save the lives of astronauts in space.

>

(Excerpt) Read more at news.stanford.edu ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; cern; fermilab; higgsboson; largehadroncollider; stringtheory; tevatron
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: agere_contra; rlmorel; decimon; cripplecreek; FredZarguna; Oztrich Boy; The_Reader_David; ...
*PING* to those of you not already on this thread.

For the rest of you, check out this blast from the past.

Cheers!

61 posted on 08/25/2010 7:15:01 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Thanks for the ping!


62 posted on 08/25/2010 7:22:01 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Glad you posted this. I was going to post it myself.

Something that affects radioactive decay rates and is faster than light. Communication with spacecraft will be the obvious application here.


63 posted on 08/25/2010 9:30:40 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
...faster than light. That's not been claimed.
64 posted on 08/26/2010 3:05:00 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: decimon
But there's one rather large question left unanswered. No one knows how neutrinos could interact with radioactive materials to change their rate of decay.

"It doesn't make sense according to conventional ideas," Fischbach said. Jenkins whimsically added, "What we're suggesting is that something that doesn't really interact with anything is changing something that can't be changed."

"It's an effect that no one yet understands," agreed Sturrock. "Theorists are starting to say, 'What's going on?' But that's what the evidence points to. It's a challenge for the physicists and a challenge for the solar people too."

If the mystery particle is not a neutrino, "It would have to be something we don't know about, an unknown particle that is also emitted by the sun and has this effect, and that would be even more remarkable," Sturrock said.


It would also be interesting to know if the effects vary between isotopes, how much the effect varies between periods of solar quiescence and periods of intense solar activity, the degree to which solar activity has varied over time, and whether this accounts for differences in radiological ages obtained using the isotope ratios of different radioactive elements. Of course, you'd have to have a known, rather than assumed, starting ratio to measure over time.
65 posted on 08/26/2010 3:38:25 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
Shades of "The Endochronic Properties of Resublimated Thiotimoline." (See Asimov).
Thanks for posting that. I've read a lot of Asimov in my life but missed this one. (He wrote a lot.)

Here's a summary from everything2.com:

This was a short story by Isaac Asimov, written in 1948. It is not a short story at all, as it takes the form of a chemistry paper. It is in fact a spoof, based on the idea that the more hydrophilic (i.e., water-loving) a chemical is, the faster it will dissolve in water. So, chemicals with increasing hydrophilism would decrease the time it would take to dissolve. Asimov's spoof pretends that a chemical called thiotimoline exists, and the time which it takes to dissolve is so low that the chemical actually dissolves before it touches the water. This was published in Astounding Stories, a magazine which specialised in short sci-fi stories. However, many people believed that the paper was real, and fans wrote in to the magazine asking for further information on the chemical, and libraries were "stormed" by people trying to locate the papers which Asimov had made joke references to. Although the work itself was essentially fiction, the format was of non-fiction.
..."Although the work itself was essentially fiction, the format was of non-fiction."...

And that is Shades of Global Warming!

66 posted on 08/26/2010 3:43:33 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
It's going to be interesting to see what kind of explanation physicists come up with for this. In one fell swoop it seems to open a whole new way to study the neutrino, the weak force itself, and the center of the Sun! And if it's not the neutrino, it reveals the existence of a new particle (or better yet, a new force in nature) and gives physicists a way to study it!
That's the situation we now find ourselves in.
67 posted on 08/26/2010 3:50:45 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
"Would this raise questions on the use of carbon dating?"

Not particularly. The total cumulative time that solar flares are causing the effect is very small compared to the time frames that carbon dating addresses. The solar wind has a much larger effect, which is why C-14 dates have to be corrected for that by cross-comparison to dendrochronology.

68 posted on 08/26/2010 4:00:04 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
"Would this raise questions on the use of carbon dating?"

On thinking about it for a minute or three, I would say that because of carbon dating's cross-calibration with dendrochronology it is the ONLY "radioactive decay" clock that is NOT affected. The cross-calibration corrects for the effect.

Other atomic clocks (potassium-argon, uranium-lead, etc.) will be in error, but my original comment about relative times of effect vs decay time measured, stands.

69 posted on 08/26/2010 5:04:55 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Global Warming, like the thiotimoline piece, has fooled a lot of gullible people. But I was thinking more along the lines of this specific comment about the solar flares:

"Jere Jenkins, while measuring the decay rate of manganese-54, a short-lived isotope used in medical diagnostics, noticed that the rate dropped slightly during the flare, a decrease that started about a day and a half before the flare."

70 posted on 08/26/2010 7:27:50 AM PDT by Bernard Marx (I donÂ’t trust the reasoning of anyone who writes then when they mean than.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

HI, Sam... Not sure if you’re agreeing with me or not. All I’m saying is this will give us a new way to study these things, if the effect is confirmed.


71 posted on 08/26/2010 9:24:12 AM PDT by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I absolutely was agreeing with you. Totally and completely. This alters the situation regarding the study of physics in a basic and fundamental way.

We find ourselves in a new situation regarding the study of atomic nuclei and solar processes.


72 posted on 08/26/2010 9:29:20 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Okay, whew! I was worried... I’m so darned enthusiastic about this! It’s so strange and potentially so important. The implications are hard to comprehend. I hope it’s confirmed. WOW! is about all I can say about it. This may be the most important find in physics since dark matter and dark energy.


73 posted on 08/26/2010 9:35:35 AM PDT by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
This may be the most important find in physics since dark matter and dark energy.
Except neither of those have actually been "found" yet, merely inferred. I know, the evidence is there, and it is strong, but the actual "found" is still lacking.
74 posted on 08/26/2010 9:45:24 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

You’re right. There I go getting overly enthusiastic again. Well, I’m going to be waiting with bated breath for the next shoe to drop on this latest discovery, that’s for sure!


75 posted on 08/26/2010 10:03:31 AM PDT by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I’m not saying there’s no such thing as dark matter or dark energy and I’m not saying that their emergence into the theoretical picture isn’t extremely important. It is. But they both still have a lot of questions.

But getting back to this story... yes. Astounding.

I forwarded it to a physicist friend of mine and I’ll post here what he says about it.


76 posted on 08/26/2010 10:47:05 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I’ll post here what he says about it.

Yes, please do. Ping me if he can't get around to replying to you right away, okay? Too bad Freeper "Physicist" doesn't hang with us anymore. He always had interesting things to say about the latest news in physics.

77 posted on 08/26/2010 1:20:33 PM PDT by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Here's his reply. (Actually, I was wrong to say he's a physicist. He's an engineer working in display technology development but he has a strong interest in physics.)
Fascinating! Physics is SO in need of shake-up/wake up - maybe this data will help. A good part of the profession are just of a bunch of medieval monks constantly trying to rationalize away all the contradictory/anomalous evidence that keeps popping up all over. Tired of the VERY bad habit of positing "unobservables" to save their bad theories ("dark matter," "dark energy," etc.) - tired of "unprovable" but "mathematically elegant" "theories" like "string theory", never induced from any experiment!

Yay for the pesky experimentalists! Yay for the (routinely sub-caste of) applied physicists! Yay for plasma physicists!

I personally don't agree with him on dark energy/matter, though I do on string theory.

78 posted on 08/26/2010 1:27:23 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Thanks. Yes, your friend voices what’s become a rather common complaint about modern physics. Can’t say I disagree with it, but I still love all the theories coming out of the theorists. At least it means they’re not out of ideas. Somebody is going to hit on the right one pretty soon I think. Hope I’m around to see it. Cheers!


79 posted on 08/26/2010 2:14:36 PM PDT by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Me too.


80 posted on 08/26/2010 2:16:04 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson