Posted on 08/11/2010 5:32:45 AM PDT by decimon
New Haven, Conn. The Gondwana supercontinent underwent a 60-degree rotation across Earths surface during the Early Cambrian period, according to new evidence uncovered by a team of Yale University geologists. Gondwana made up the southern half of Pangaea, the giant supercontinent that constituted the Earths landmass before it broke up into the separate continents we see today. The study, which appears in the August issue of the journal Geology, has implications for the environmental conditions that existed at a crucial period in Earths evolutionary history called the Cambrian explosion, when most of the major groups of complex animals rapidly appeared.
The team studied the paleomagnetic record of the Amadeus Basin in central Australia, which was part of the Gondwana precursor supercontinent. Based on the directions of the ancient rocks magnetization, they discovered that the entire Gondwana landmass underwent a rapid 60-degree rotational shift, with some regions attaining a speed of at least 16 (+12/-8) cm/year, about 525 million years ago. By comparison, the fastest shifts we see today are at speeds of about four cm/year.
This was the first large-scale rotation that Gondwana underwent after forming, said Ross Mitchell, a Yale graduate student and author of the study. The shift could either be the result of plate tectonics (the individual motion of continental plates with respect to one another) or true polar wander, in which the Earths solid land mass (down to the liquid outer core almost 3,000 km deep) rotates together with respect to the planets rotational axis, changing the location of the geographic poles, Mitchell said.
The debate about the role of true polar wander versus plate tectonics in defining the motions of Earths continents has been going on in the scientific community for decades, as more and more evidence is gathered, Mitchell said.
In this case, Mitchell and his team suggest that the rates of Gondwanas motion exceed those of normal plate tectonics as derived from the record of the past few hundred million years. If true polar wander caused the shift, that makes sense. If the shift was due to plate tectonics, wed have to come up with some pretty novel explanations.
Whatever the cause, the massive shift had some major consequences. As a result of the rotation, the area that is now Brazil would have rapidly moved from close to the southern pole toward the tropics. Such large movements of landmass would have affected environmental factors such as carbon concentrations and ocean levels, Mitchell said.
There were dramatic environmental changes taking place during the Early Cambrian, right at the same time as Gondwana was undergoing this massive shift, he said. Apart from our understanding of plate tectonics and true polar wander, this could have had huge implications for the Cambrian explosion of animal life at that time.
Other authors of the paper include David Evans and Taylor Kilian.
Citation: DOI: 10.1130/G30910.1
PRESS CONTACT: Suzanne Taylor Muzzin 203-432-8555
The paleomagnetic record from the Amadeus Basin in Australia (marked by the star) indicate a large shift in some parts of the Gondwana supercontinent relative to the South Pole. (Illustration: Ross Mitchell/Yale University)
Shift work ping.
read
Much warmer core and thinner crust maybe?
>with some regions attaining a speed of at least 16 (+12/-8) cm/year,
OMG, that is 6.3 inches per year! Ah! Clearly GW.
I like a thinner crust and lots of sauce.
Lots of cheesy magma for me thanks.
Polar wander? My wife would kill me if she found out...
STOP CONTINENTAL DRIFT!!! REUNITE GONDWANALAND!!!
Bush’s fault?
New discoveries are always challenging accepted science. It's the scientists who cling to past and present theories in the face of emerging skepticism who fail the test of true science.
Do people actually get paid to dream up this crap? Show me where to join...I have a few ideas I’d like to get paid for. (snicker)
Huh, and I thought the Cambrian Explosion took place in Chicago in 1893.
I watched a documentary on earthquakes last night (one I hadn’t seen before).
One guy had the opinion that if we didn’t have earth quake the earth would not be habitable.
IOW quakes are a good thing for nature to keep re-establishing.
They did allot of interviews and should tours of the homes that were destroyed in the 89 N. Cali quake (where I was in the process of leaving for a more rural life in the PNW)
Me too but I like he green pesto sauce vs. red.
If it weren’t for the molten core keeping the plate techtonics going and causing earthqukes, the land would erode away to settle on the floor of the oceans.
That molten core also gives us our magnetic field which protects us and prevents the solar wind from slowly stripping our atmosphere away.
Rove, you magnificent bastard!
Only 14 posts before one of the resident experts chimes in. Please feel free to provide your views on the subject.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.