Posted on 05/11/2010 2:26:06 PM PDT by navysealdad
What's the matter with a full figure lady.
(Excerpt) Read more at angelfire.com ...
Va.
Va
Va
Voom!
Comfortable.
Fine looking woman. Sensual.
Slam it like a screen door in a tornado......
Hokey Smokes! I usually base my inner censor on if I’d like something to suddenly come on TV when I’m watching with my daughter when she’s around 6 years old, and based on that criteria, no, I’d censor this.
Now for daddy.... well, holey mackerel! I may have to go seek out a Helen Thomas thread just to make it through the rest of the day!
Thanks, added to my Graphics folder.
Don’t know where they are going for lunch, but Dan is a lucky guy.
Did some time in Texas, kind of a different view on the matter, as Texans are wont to do.
This thread is incomplete without Laz.
Bookmark.
She is beautiful and built like a real woman not like those 'tanorexic' skags you see on reality shows or on most fashion runways.
And BTW, "I'd hit that like she stole something."
As a completely hetero female, I can say she’s a beautiful woman. Frankly, I see more cleavage jiggling around on Dancing With The Stars on ABC.
But they have no problem with Victoria’s Secret Angel underwear commercials???? Give me a break! I thought LB’s was okay.
“Did you see her hourglass figure? That is how women are SUPPOSED to look, not the boy-looking walking pixie stix that you see in movies and on the runway.”
I hate this stupid false choice we’re presented with. As if you either have to have “curves” or be skinny. As if skinny women don’t also have hourglass figures. Yes, runway models have funny, freakish little-boy bodies, but that’s because that industry has nothing to do with heterosexual males. It’s really neither here nor there when it comes to what sort of women have “curves.”
>>I hate this stupid false choice we’re presented with. As if you either have to have “curves” or be skinny. As if skinny women don’t also have hourglass figures. Yes, runway models have funny, freakish little-boy bodies, but that’s because that industry has nothing to do with heterosexual males. It’s really neither here nor there when it comes to what sort of women have “curves.”<<
Not quite sure what your point is. To me almost all real women are beautiful. I was just comparing a womanly figure to the modern fashion “standard” that is so awful.
>>Frankly, I see more cleavage jiggling around on Dancing With The Stars on ABC.<<
And they might as well be naked on “So, You Think You Can Dance.”
You mean the homosexualized view of how a perfect woman should look?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.