Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McDonnell; Brown; Palin; Santorum; Petraeus- All Telegenic Presidential Candidates But Not...
April 09th 2010

Posted on 04/09/2010 9:42:00 PM PDT by Steelfish

Bob McDonnell; Scott Brown; Sarah Palin; Rick Santorum; Petraeus - All Telegenic Presidential Candidates. OUT: Newt Gingrich; Haley Barbour; Pawlenty. It is critical that the next Republican candidate for president not only be a true conservative but one who can project a telegenic image to sway voters to pull the lever for them. The outcome of the presidential election of 2012 will either result in the signing of this nation's death warrant with an Obama re-election or trail-blaze a path to a miraculous political resurrection. With this being the case we simply cannot have our blinders on regarding the crucial issue of telemetrics no matter how articulate or informed the candidate is. Of course these qualities are essential but in the end "image" matters because it is how a candidate "connects" with the voting masses.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2012; palin; palin2012; sarahlovfest; telegenic; thune; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241 next last
To: jveritas
My IQ is twice that of all the Palin cultists combined.

Yep, you're right up there tied with Biden.

201 posted on 04/10/2010 5:18:44 AM PDT by kanawa (CBC=CHNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

What about Lieutenant Colonel Allen West? He is my candidate, Sarah Palin is not for me. As a woman, I should be more inclined to vote for her but in my opinion, she just does not have it. I want a strong man, and no blow dried ken or barbie dolls that spew the usual talking points.


202 posted on 04/10/2010 5:23:40 AM PDT by seoul62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

is it a qualification to keep one’s job if it means personally going bankrupt? that would be stupidity.

Yea, i will vote for someone that stupid/sarc off

Try this: the 2012 election will be a referendum on Zero. The quit meme, if it has any life, will be played out in the R primary and somehow, i doubt Romney can use “Quitter’ when the woman has been going pretty much nonstop since last fall 2009 and engaged and taking heat from the Libturds and msm.

I can understand you preferring a candidate you refuse to promote for whatever reason but following Reagan’s 11th commandment will help all conservatives.


203 posted on 04/10/2010 5:23:45 AM PDT by Piers-the-Ploughman (Just say no to circular firing squads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I’m not going to be able to read all of the previous comments, so let me offer my two cents worth:

The job of electing a president and deciding qualifications should not be done the same way as one chooses a valedictorian. This isn’t a contest of either grades or supposed intellect.

That we allowed this last election to be turned into such proved the folly of the idea. We also cannot be accused of racism, as we elected a man who left NO footprint of his previous life, with no serious accomplishments to his name. Goodhearted Americans ignored all these things and elected Obama just the same, taking a chance.

We now see the consequences.

Choosing a president is about their “insides.” All presidents will be surrounded by smart people, experts in their field. Presidents do not need that.

We are voting for their morals, their values...if we share them.

This explains the sudden disconnect between Obama and the people, after just one year into his presidency. It is the reason why we have the nagging feeling of something being dreadfully wrong. He shares neither our morals, nor our values, and more importantly.....he doesn’t share our uniquely American soul. He’s on some left wing “auto-pilot” mode. There is no “there” there, with Obama. The only values he holds are anti-American, grievance oriented values.

I once worked for a wonderful man, who didn’t realize he was being undermined by his brother’s new wife. This was a family business, 75 years old. To prove to him he was being undermined, I began (on my own) to collect documents from company waste baskets to show him what they were up to. Finally, he said to me “Why would she be doing this? I don’t get it.” I said “She comes from nothing. She’s never had a stake in a damn thing. Anything she has, she got or stole from someone else. And you’re next.”

And then I told him: there is no more dangerous person you will ever meet on this earth, than someone with nothing to lose.

And there you have it with Obama.

He has no real principles, no national loyalty, no family history to betray, no family name to soil for all time.

In other words, he’s got nothing to lose.


204 posted on 04/10/2010 5:36:37 AM PDT by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Palin needs to replace Steele at the RNC........NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


205 posted on 04/10/2010 7:30:24 AM PDT by bt579 (America elected a reader when it needs a leader. Clean the House in 2010, Right the Wrong in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Even reasonable people who haven't picked a candidate can see that your behavior on this thread is a disgrace.
206 posted on 04/10/2010 9:18:49 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
You are using page 1 paragraph 1 of the left wing tactics. When you lose a debate accuse the opponent of being a sexist or a racist. And on the top of that you are stupidly bringing my ethnic background to make your smear. You have no shame what so ever. You are not just smearing me and making false accusation about me but you made the dumbest assertion of all that a White Male cannot defeat Obama in 2012. May be this should be Palin slogan “White Male Presidential candidate cannot defeat Obama in 2012” let us see how popular this will be among the voters.
207 posted on 04/10/2010 9:36:26 AM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Piers-the-Ploughman
Stop the silly excuse of going bankrupt meme. She would have set up a fund and got millions of dollars from her adoring fans to pay for her legal fees and more. As I said the excuses of why she resigned will make her even weaker in the eyes of the majority of voters.

She simply cannot get away from this politically fatal resignation no matter how much you guys or she wishes it to be.

208 posted on 04/10/2010 9:39:34 AM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn
I am wondering meadsjn about your stupid tagline that says you want Palin to become President in 2012 or before? How do you expect Palin to become President before 2012? Do you know how idiotic your tagline is?
209 posted on 04/10/2010 9:46:18 AM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; jveritas
I'm sure that Sarah Palin would be pleased and impressed to learn that some FReepers are employing lynch mob tactics on her behalf. NOT!
210 posted on 04/10/2010 10:39:45 AM PDT by EveningStar (Karl Marx is not one of our Founding Fathers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
And on the top of that you are stupidly bringing my ethnic background to make your smear.

So how exactly are women treated in your Arab Lebanese home culture?

211 posted on 04/10/2010 11:03:19 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I don’t think that Sarah Palin would be pleased and impressed with your pro homosexual postings and your pro Rudy pro Romney posting, I don’t think that she would praise your consistent antiPalin trolling and fake concern for what Palin approves of or disapproves of either.

You guys that are weak on conservatism and support the things like the homosexual agenda really have a dislike for a conservative like Governor Palin.


212 posted on 04/10/2010 11:03:37 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
She would have set up a fund and got millions of dollars from her adoring fans to pay for her legal fees and more.

Hey bub...this is for your education:

Report Questions Palin Legal Defense Fund

Not has well-informed as you thought you were, are you?

213 posted on 04/10/2010 11:09:11 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
First of all I am an a very proud American so I do not call myself Lebanese American or Arab American but just an American. Second my ethnic background is Lebanese Christian and in this Lebanese Christian culture women are treated equally to men and have exactly the same rights as men.

Your problem Viriginia Ridgerunner is that you are not just a fool who uses liberal tactis to smear those who disagree with him but you are a person who needs a lot of education.

214 posted on 04/10/2010 11:13:52 AM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Virginia Ridgerunner
Your problem Viriginia Ridgerunner is that you are not just a fool who uses liberal tactis to smear those who disagree with him but you are a person who needs a lot of education.

Your problem jveritas is that you come on a thread unprovoked and you start smearing people who have a different point-of-view about Sarah Palin than you do. Then you act so surprised when they respond in kind with smears.

Shall I start from the beginning of this thread and document your smears?

215 posted on 04/10/2010 11:22:29 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Your problem Viriginia Ridgerunner is that you are not just a fool who uses liberal tactis to smear those who disagree with him but you are a person who needs a lot of education.


216 posted on 04/10/2010 11:28:33 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Looks like the McPalinistas are trying to silence you.


217 posted on 04/10/2010 11:32:13 AM PDT by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
What else they can do. Imagine if they cannot take on a little guy on an internet forum how are they going to take on the massive political machine of the left? Oh wait a second, the left poitical machine has already defeated Palin and forced her to surrender and resign from her governor office.
218 posted on 04/10/2010 11:37:15 AM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

There are Palin cultists on FR and there is no doubt about that. Every observor who is not an adoring fan or a Palin cultist will quickly realize this simple fact.


219 posted on 04/10/2010 11:39:07 AM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
There are Palin cultists on FR and there is no doubt about that. Every observor who is not an adoring fan or a Palin cultist will quickly realize this simple fact.

There are reasonable people on FR who enthustiasically support Palin.

There are reasonable people on FR who like Sarah Palin, who think she is doing a good job fighting Obama, and who are considering supporting Sarah.

Define what you think makes somebody a "Palin Cultist" worthy of your insults, contempt and smears.

Or shall I go back on this thread and document what you think is worthy of such smears?

220 posted on 04/10/2010 11:57:08 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson