Skip to comments.
Michelle Obama hits Conde Nast Traveler cover
Conde nast Traveler ^
| April 8, 2010
| Lynn Sweet
Posted on 04/08/2010 2:42:26 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: afraidfortherepublic
![](http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/assets_c/2010/04/CoverMay_Page_1-thumb-500x669-19403.jpg)
First Lady Michelle Obama hits the cover of Conde Nast's Traveler talking about living in Washington. Where are Mrs. Obama's favorite places? See above.
To: afraidfortherepublic
What a target-rich article, LOL!
3
posted on
04/08/2010 2:44:27 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save the Earth. It's the only planet with Chocolate.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
That’s one of the nicest pictures I’ve ever seen of Michelle Obama.
But, all of her favorites concern food, or money.
To: afraidfortherepublic
I hope this silly magazine for the limousine liberals has an article about how to photoshop under difficult circumstances.
5
posted on
04/08/2010 2:45:55 PM PDT
by
eleni121
(For Jesus did not give us a timid spirit , but a spirit of power, of love and of self-discipline)
To: afraidfortherepublic
I’m thinking air brushed cover.
6
posted on
04/08/2010 2:46:17 PM PDT
by
4yearlurker
("No King but King Jesus!")
To: 4yearlurker
7
posted on
04/08/2010 2:49:01 PM PDT
by
ShandaLear
(The price of Obamacare? 30 pieces of silver.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
To: afraidfortherepublic
Conde Nasty magazine...featuring Americans who hate America...
9
posted on
04/08/2010 2:49:37 PM PDT
by
jessduntno
( If someone calls me racist, I reply "you are just saying that because I'm white!")
To: eleni121
Now I can be as catty as anyone, but I think she looks great in this cover picture. I don’t know if it has been touched up, but she looks classy here. She’s not scowling. She’s not standing like she’s trying to cross a creek without bridge. Her dress is appropriate. There are no excess ruffles, or fringe, anywhere. No too-tight, misbuttoned cardigan. What’s not to like?
To: afraidfortherepublic
Very nice looking picture. Photoshop works miracles.
11
posted on
04/08/2010 2:52:00 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: ShandaLear
Look at those skinny arms. And that waist.
They photo-shopped about 50-75 lbs off of her.
Who do they think they’re kidding?
12
posted on
04/08/2010 2:52:44 PM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(PALIN/MCCAIN IN 2012 barf alert? sarc tag? -- can't decide)
To: stainlessbanner
Why is she hunched over?To hide the fact that her waist is just below her boobs?
13
posted on
04/08/2010 2:54:59 PM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
("...a whip of political correctness strangles their voice"-Vaclav Klaus on GW skeptics)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Boy, airbrushing can take off a lot of bumps and rumps.
To: afraidfortherepublic
![Katie Couric, retouched. Pictures, Images and Photos](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v618/bunchito/RetouchedKatie.jpg)
Not the first time a cover has been photoshopped skinnier
To: Snickering Hound
Pre, then post colon cleaning.
16
posted on
04/08/2010 2:59:36 PM PDT
by
gathersnomoss
(General George Patton had it right.)
To: Snickering Hound
Name one woman who would not welcome a little airbrushing on her official photo, and former First lady, Barbara Bush, does not count!
After all, the old portrait artists did it all the time. There used to be itinerent artists who went from farm to farm with already painted portraits in their wagons. The lady of the house could choose one in a dress she liked, and the artist would paint in her face, collect his fee, and off to the next farm!
To: afraidfortherepublic
There are no excess ruffles, or fringe, anywhere. No too-tight, misbuttoned cardigan. And most important-------------nooooooo boooob belt!
18
posted on
04/08/2010 3:04:33 PM PDT
by
mupcat
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Monticello: "It is just incredibly beautiful, and that beautiful garden that he planted that is three times the size of anything that you'd ever do.I wonder if she stopped to think that Jefferson's garden was planted and maintained by a huge contingent of slaves inherited from his father-in-law and his wife. And it was expected to feed the hosuehold, guests, and the huge contingent of slaves all year. No PDQ or 7-Eleven at Monticello!
To: mupcat
Well, we really cant tell, can we? She’s leaning forward! But all in all, I think it’s a lovely picture of her.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson