Posted on 03/03/2010 10:49:07 PM PST by capacommie
Medical said:
"One of my nephews is a Harvard graduate and a former Rhodes Scholar. As a tenured professor at Saint Hughs College and a member of the universitys admissions committee, plus a very highly regarded Harvard alumni, M has full access to Harvards complete physical and electronic student records and he can locate absolutely no transfer records from Columbia, no admission application, no academic records, no photographs, no index records, or any other information about the Usurper in the official files of Harvard. M located no redacted index information that would indicate the Usurper was ever enrolled or that he received an honorary degree. As you can readily gather from reading the academic background of M, he is a very intelligent and competent researcher and analyst who relies on facts. M says the Usurper definitely never attended Harvard and anything purporting to show otherwise is a fabrication. This information proves the information Doctor James David Manning discovered about the Usurper never attending Columbia is also true. The Usurpers entire life history is a total fabrication and he is a complete fraud. By ignoring the critical issue of the Usurpers false background, Congress and the courts are seriously endangering our nations security. DO NOT vote for ANY incumbent politicians, they have proven themselves to be useless parasites who are a danger to our nation!"
FRAUD!!
Notice his "straight from the ground" arm. He must have some of Stretch Armstrong's DNA. Not to mention once again the camera recognizes the messiah in him and makes him crisper than anyone else in the photo. Hand too dark/small.
dang, hes gotta big head in that photo
I have seen that image of obama in the library a hundred times, and I was one of the first, if not THE first to post the group image with the NAMES.
The question I am asking is; why would Harvard Law, having over a hundred years of group images on their website, of Harvard Law students, not have the groups showing for the very years that obama attended?
Go back, pick up the link, check it out for yourself. I’m through here.
Interesting. That’s definitely not the norm for higher education in the US. It doesn’t look like it was always the norm for Harvard Law either as the pictures are sporadic and not there for every class. I don’t think I saw any b/w 1987 and 2004, for example.
I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make exactly? That Barry wasn’t at Harvard?
Frankly I’d be more suspicious if he had a law degree from what the MSM would call a “lesser school,” as Harvard is more a (leftist) political institution than an academic one.
As long as he showed up to class occasionally and regurgitated leftist talking points even semi-literately on the tests he would get his degree. We already know he managed to be head of the Law Review without writing anything. The whole institution of Harvard has been joke for almost 50 years now. They’re not going to flunk an affirmative action case.
Subject: Classes included in the collection are: ca. 1875, 1877, 1881, 1888, 1893 or 1896, 1895, 1897, 1899, ca. 1900, 1901, 1902, 1904, 1906 - 1912, ca. 1914, ca. 1916, 1919 - 1922, ca. 1923, 1924 - 1927, 1929 - 1934, 1936 - 1942, 1946, 1950, 2003 - 2007. Also included are pictures showing only graduate students from 1926, 1932, 1936, 1951, 1952, 1956, 1970, 1977, 1978, 1980, 1983 - 1985, and two pictures showing only the female students from 1953. There are no pictures of the full graduating classes from 1951 through 2002.
After enlarging, and checking the light and shadows, I agree, this photo has been tweeked bigtime!
What point am I trying to make? I thought it was quite simple. The image exists. It’s captioned with the names of the students. The image is identified as Harvard Law Review with a Volume Number.
Why has the image not been included here:
This is quite simple; and I already tried to explain this to you in post 279.
The photos in question are pictures of the staff of Harvard Law Review. They are not photos of a law school class.
Law Review is a student organization. It is not a graduating class.
So, you won’t find those pictures when you search on the term “class,” as in the link you keep posting.
I found them just by searching on “Obama.”
I’m sure you will find them if you search on “Law Review” rather than “class.”
Quite simple.
Hope this helps.
OK, thanks, got it now, sorry it took so long. Have you found that group from the Harvard Law Review on the Harvard site, and can you direct me to a link?
Yeah, that from the 1990-91 Law Review when he was the do-nothing President.
Here’s the 1989-90 Law Review photo:
Both pop up when you search Obama. So does the NYTimes picture in front of the bookshelves. And a fourth picture shows up, but it’s a picture of an old statue; and you need a special login to click through and see what the caption is (and why it has the word Obama in it).
They’ve been silenced, Chicago style.
His UPPER arms look gigantic. Compare them with others’ arms in the photo. And he was always SKINNY.
I searched for Obama, and four images came up. One was of a statue of some kind, and the other four were of the Law Review staff.
Imagine if he were a Pubbie
Wow. That bulbous nose is definitely pre-surgery.
Some day the truth will be revealed and we will become the laughing stock of the world.
All it means is that our NSA cannot be trusted and neither can GWB< because he shold have known about this hoax.
There are approx. one hundred years of group images of Harvard Law graduates in the collection shown, and the only years missing are those during which Obama supposedly attended.
http://via.lib.harvard.edu/via/deliver/results?_collection=via&displayCell=1
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.