Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should wild animals be held in captivity for human entertainment?
examiner ^ | February 26

Posted on 02/27/2010 9:14:01 AM PST by JoeProBono

This was a question asked of the CNN audience by Wolf Blitzer Thursday afternoon--the day after an experienced trainer, 40 year old Dawn Brancheau, was killed in a tragic accident by an orca whale at the Orlando SeaWorld Park.

The response to the polling question, “should animals be used for human entertainment”--was answered predominately “no.”

One person wrote of how he was mesmerized by a show at the aquarium, when he was a small boy. Then later, as an adult, he saw a similar show, with dolphins and whales and he felt physically ill for the animals and the life they were forced to live.

Another e-mail respondent told his account of a homeless man, who managed to get into the polar bear enclosure in his home town zoo. The bear mauled him to death. Afterward, the police shot the bear, who was innocently minding his own business and did not ask for a strange man to inter his domain.

One lady said SeaWorld was all about money and greed. The aquarium owners were trying to say that having whales in captivity was all about research. She once saw a trainer surfboarding on a whale’s back and said it didn’t look like research to her. She felt sorry for the family of the trainer, but felt sorrier for the whale.

The fact is SeaWorld and other aquariums and theme parks build their entire brand around the performance of whales, dolphins, and other aquatic life. If they lose their performers, they lose their revenue.

Similarly, the Mirage Hotel in Las Vegas built their entire brand around the magicians, Siegfried and Roy, and their Royal white tigers. Unfortunately, in the fall of 2003, in one of the most widely publicized performing animal attacks, a white tiger bit Roy Horn during their show.

Evidently, the tiger named Montecore, had been distracted by a woman in the front row of the audience and bit Roy’s arm, when he moved between the two. Roy shouted “release, release” and hit the tiger on the nose with his microphone. But when Roy was released, he tripped over the cat’s paw and fell. Stage hands further confused the cat, when they rushed the stage to intervene. Suddenly, Montecore picked Roy up by the neck, much like a cat would pick up its kitten, and hauled him back stage. Fire extinguishers had to be used to separate the two.

Horn was rushed to the hospital, where he underwent surgery on his head. Later, he spent many months recuperating from his injuries and a stroke he had suffered during the ordeal.....


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; Pets/Animals
KEYWORDS: captivity; dawnbrancheau; seaworld; shamu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Siegfried & Roy with white tiger


1 posted on 02/27/2010 9:14:02 AM PST by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

2 posted on 02/27/2010 9:15:31 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

3 posted on 02/27/2010 9:16:18 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

4 posted on 02/27/2010 9:17:07 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

They should be kept for education.

I learned that there is a good reason they call them killer whales and not cuddly sea puppies.


5 posted on 02/27/2010 9:17:10 AM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I am generally not a big animal rights advocate but it does seem that something is wrong with keeping whales in capativity solely for the purpose of entertaining humans.


6 posted on 02/27/2010 9:17:34 AM PST by TaxMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Should jourbalists who write shallow screeds about captive animals being mere entertainment rather than also being educational avoid the ridicule they deserve?


7 posted on 02/27/2010 9:21:18 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Should wild animals be held in captivity for human entertainment?

The answer to that all depends upon how good they taste.

8 posted on 02/27/2010 9:22:49 AM PST by central_va ( http://www.15thvirginia.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxMe

Where has that ever happened?


9 posted on 02/27/2010 9:23:05 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TaxMe

These are definitely animals kept to entertain. As I’ve said I don’t mind keeping them for learning purposes but training them for the stupid crap proves that its about entertainment.


10 posted on 02/27/2010 9:23:16 AM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TaxMe

Wild animals should not be used for entertainment purposes but those born in captively or in captivity a long time cannot be released into the wild. It would be a near certain death sentence for them.


11 posted on 02/27/2010 9:23:23 AM PST by chrisinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I don’t think people realize how harsh nature can be to animals that live in the wild.


12 posted on 02/27/2010 9:25:42 AM PST by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisinoc

Should wild animals be held in captivity for human entertainment?

No


13 posted on 02/27/2010 9:26:11 AM PST by choctaw man (Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chrisinoc

Personally I think they should be kept in much larger enclosures and contact with humans kept at a minimum. They really are awesome creatures but you’re right about not being able to release them now.


14 posted on 02/27/2010 9:26:31 AM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

No it does not.

Your personal attempt to employ a false either/or statement does not make it so.

I not only reject your assertion that if it is educational it must be done in a boring monotonous lecture drone, I challenge you to show that manner works as well for teaching as making it fun.

You prove that, and I will let you off.

Othewise I will call you for attempting to advance a false premis backed by a misplaced emotional appeal, in pretty much the cookie cutter manner that the rest of the environmentalist agenda has been promoted.


15 posted on 02/27/2010 9:29:26 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TaxMe

is this a peta site?
we’re talking animals here.
a repeat biter dog is put down
Where is the sympaphy for the dead woman?
oh yeah lets retire seeing eye dogs and no more drug sniffing or explosive seeking dogs. why it’s involuntary servitude


16 posted on 02/27/2010 9:30:14 AM PST by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: central_va

central_va ,,,, Just something about being from the SOUTH and animals ,, We love’m on the old BAR-B-Q pit


17 posted on 02/27/2010 9:31:29 AM PST by piroque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Okay, here’s my take.

At one time, there may have been an educational value to zoos. Before TV, when books were expensive and literacy was not so common, a zoo was pretty much the only place for the general public to see an animal from outside of one’s own geographical area. Now that we have information available on the Internet, and on the Discovery Channel and Animal Planet, I view a zoo as an entertainment venue and not an educational one, therefore, not strictly necessary.

Of course, there is always something to be said for seeing a wild animal in the flesh and not as a bunch of pixels. But I’d rather save that option for animals whose habitiat can be re-created in a relatively small space, such as a zoo offers. Go visit the snake house or the monkey jungle at the zoo, but for heaven’s sake leave a creature with the size and temperament of a killer whale out in the ocean where it belongs. You can’t build a new ocean in San Diego.

Just my opinion!


18 posted on 02/27/2010 9:31:30 AM PST by mrs. a (It's a short life but a merry one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrs. a

Yikes!

habitiat = habitat


19 posted on 02/27/2010 9:33:13 AM PST by mrs. a (It's a short life but a merry one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

I don’t care.

Unilke many here I do not fret about what animals think (they don’t really)

I like my pets and I like my meat and skins...and I can pick my way through the nuance between those positions

the only concern I would have is decent treatment and extinction concerns but the latter are overused today


20 posted on 02/27/2010 9:33:47 AM PST by wardaddy (I'm waiting for Epic Beard Man the movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson