Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All

4 posted on 02/27/2010 9:17:07 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: JoeProBono

Sure, but the carniverous ones should be fed enviornmentalists for every meal.


27 posted on 02/27/2010 9:37:27 AM PST by 1raider1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: JoeProBono

“Should wild animals be kept for human entertainment?”

Yes. Wild animals are dangerous, “tame” animals big enough to kill or maim are still dangersous. Good object lesson here.

My question: Should whales (Killer) which feed on wild salmon be thinned out?

My answer: Yes

My second question: Should whales (Humpback) which feed on tons of baitfish be thinned out so the competing species (wild salmon) have more of their natural food source available?

My answer: Yes

Are we here to serve the animals or are they here to serve us? (Bonus question)

Second bonus question: Should we stop drilling, farming, mining, logging etc... because a of spotted owl or toad?

Hell no! Do you get my drift?....

Great thread. Thanks.


52 posted on 02/27/2010 11:02:37 AM PST by gettinolder (Smashed lips save ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson