Posted on 11/23/2009 9:46:13 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE
. 9/11 SCOTT "Let's Roll" BEAMER's Dad called for "Regime Change USA-2010/2012" on FoX this morning.
I believe what Mr. Beamer said that he was for “Open Change,” meaning winning elections in ‘10 and ‘12.
“How about illegal?”
Illegal means nothing when you are dealing with an administration that is itself illegal (unconstitutional).
Citizens have not just a right, but a responsibility, to set aside a tyrannical government by force if necessary. Hopefully it won’t be necessary...
2010 very well my our last best chance to change the course of history. I just hope we aren’t too late. There’s a reason The One is trying to push all his programs through so quickly.
REGIME CHANGE 2010-2012: What a fantastic slogan/ideal!!! Any artistic/photoshopping freepers out there who could come up with an appropriate logo! Should become the rallying cry for saving our country!
I saw him speak in Johnstown at a rally against Murtha. The crash site is very moving, a large field and a hole.
Illegal? Legal? Oftentimes the difference between those is only what some special interest group has managed to push past a legislative body. In some cases the “push” amounts to how much $$$ can be brought to bear (re: Sen. Mary Landreau.) I think I prefer the couth/uncouth differentiation. YMMV.
amazing...it was great they just let him go...
let’s see if the criminal liberal media will give this intelligent, well-spoken gentlemen the same podium they gave cindy sheehan!!
Unfortunately, for us the taxpayers, the “pay offs for votes” is quite common. Unfortunately. In both parties.
Every REAL American should hear his presentation. The liberals would not understand it or criticize it. The state controlled media will condem it. I refuse to watch the “MSM” to confirm this however.
Yeah, we’ve allowed it to happen since about John Adams’ presidency. Seems like we ought to be used to it by now. Instead though, every time we see another example we get “surprised” and “shocked” all over again.
Oh well, that’s just another step down that slippery slope to third world status. I doubt any other country has welcomed their opportunity to descend into socialism so why should we be different?
Yes. I am amused by the shock and surprise by a practice that has been around as long as this one has. And we keep electing and re electing the same politicians.
I heard the interview this AM--he was absolutely awesome!
I had the pleasure of meeting David MacMillen who was Todd Beamers best friend a year after 9-11. Myself and some friends volunteered for THE MARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDATION(Rush’s favorite www.mc-lef.org) by putting on a Charity Golf outing and a Marine Corps meet and greet community day in town.
We invited Todd’s Foundation along with many others....Incredible individual with a huge heart and a desire to help children who were affected by the loss of a parent in the 9-11 attacks. Very similar to the MC-LEF org.
He spoke very passionately on what a great person Todd was and the family in general. I’m glad his father is speaking out...we need this side of the story to show how this trial and administration is a JOKE when it comes to the War on Terror!
It may VERY well be our last chance at change, is right.
Lovin’ my new tagline!
It may VERY well be our last chance at change, is right.
Lovin’ my new tagline!
There are 3 in Texas who support
REGIME CHANGE USA/2010-2012
LETS Roll!......
I live your tagline!
We keep re-electing them because we’re a bit like Hamlet who’d “rather bear the ills we have, than fly to others we know not of..” Now we have the opportunity to elect someone different and we’re constantly bombarded by naysayers who fear change, even though they supposedly voted for it last time.
Well, I’m getting old now and may not be around for many more elections— perhaps not even the next one. But if I do get to vote I think I’ll vote to upset the apple-cart and send those “ills” scrambling for their lives. They’ve managed to screw up this once great country so badly that I doubt it can be unscrewed by anything less than a national catastrophe. On the off-chance I’m wrong, I’ll vote to let Sarah try to straighten theings out. If I’m really wrong and she turns out as badly as the liberal pundits believe, then she can serve as the ‘national catastrophe.’
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.