Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Fight Club’ Fight Goes On
NY TImes ^ | 11/06/09 | DENNIS LIM

Posted on 11/10/2009 2:37:03 PM PST by Borges

Cult films, the critic Danny Peary wrote in his 1981 book “Cult Movies,” “are born in controversy” and elicit “a fiery passion in moviegoers that exists long after their initial releases.” By those measures David Fincher’s “Fight Club,” a movie that stirred vitriolic ire when it came out 10 years ago and today inspires obsessive, often worshipful scrutiny in both lowbrow and highbrow quarters, is surely the defining cult movie of our time.

In his memoir Art Linson, a producer of the film, describes the aftermath of the first screening at the 20th Century Fox lot: ashen-faced executives imagining their higher-ups (including Rupert Murdoch) “flopping around like acid-crazed carp wondering how such a thing could even have happened.”

The nervousness over screen violence was at a renewed high in the wake of the shootings at Columbine High School, and this must have seemed like the worst possible time to release a film in which an army of alienated men, led by Brad Pitt’s charismatic Tyler Durden, an übermensch in a red leather jacket, engage in bare-knuckle brawls, antisocial vandalism and outright revolutionary terrorism. When “Fight Club” opened in October 1999 after much defensive maneuvering from the studio (which delayed the release and struggled to find a marketing hook), the pundits eagerly took aim.

“The critical reaction was polarized,” said Edward Norton, who plays the film’s nameless narrator, “but the negative half of that was as vituperative as anything I’ve ever been a part of.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: fightclub; hollywood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2009 2:37:03 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Borges

Wait - I thought we weren’t supposed to talk about this... ?


2 posted on 11/10/2009 2:39:20 PM PST by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

A truly great movie. Didn’t hurt that Helena Bonham Carter was in it!


3 posted on 11/10/2009 2:40:29 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear (These fragments I have shored against my ruins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Party_Animal

I liked it from the start and remember explaning it to people. Michael Medved really missed the ball with this film.


4 posted on 11/10/2009 2:40:42 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borges
...the defining cult movie of our time.

The Big Lewbowski begs to differ, dude.

5 posted on 11/10/2009 2:45:18 PM PST by Martin Tell (ask for the ancient paths, ask where the good way is, and walk in it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

6 posted on 11/10/2009 2:47:26 PM PST by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Fun movie. The book is actually a comedy.


7 posted on 11/10/2009 2:48:27 PM PST by Husker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker

So is the film.


8 posted on 11/10/2009 2:49:08 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Borges
"'The critical reaction was polarized,' said Edward Norton, who plays the film’s nameless narrator..."

Oh, he has a name all right.

9 posted on 11/10/2009 2:53:01 PM PST by Fabozz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

You have more patience than I do. I gave up explaining it to people who said “It’s just a movie about fighting” a loooong time ago.

Really brilliant book though.


10 posted on 11/10/2009 2:55:11 PM PST by ruiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I loved the book, and I loved the movie. I just watched it again over the summer. It holds up well ... too well, if you catch my drift.


11 posted on 11/10/2009 2:56:44 PM PST by Carling (Nobelgate: Obama's Waterloo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

One of my favorite movies of that decade. Fight Club and Office Space are kind of the visible bibles of the cubicle work-farm generation.


12 posted on 11/10/2009 3:00:45 PM PST by discostu (The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I liked the movie. The climactic punch line stopped being funny after 911 (a little too real) but it was a good movie.

And I agree with the others about Helena. Very good in her role.


13 posted on 11/10/2009 3:05:43 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Several years ago Fincher made a film called ‘Zodiac’ which I think is one of the best American features of this decade. Very few people have seen it.


14 posted on 11/10/2009 3:10:28 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Thanks for the movie title - I’m going to check that out - sounds interesting.


15 posted on 11/10/2009 3:39:32 PM PST by scottdeus12 (Jesus is real, whether you believe in Him or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Borges

“Pitt voluntarily visited a dentist to have pieces of his front teeth chipped off so his character would not have perfect teeth. The pieces were restored after filming concluded.”

http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fight_Club_(film)


16 posted on 11/10/2009 3:54:53 PM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

bookmark


17 posted on 11/10/2009 4:49:51 PM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

The third act, well it didn’t really ruin the movie, but it did stretch the premise a bit too far.


18 posted on 11/10/2009 5:37:02 PM PST by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

You mean the idea of the ‘Double’?


19 posted on 11/10/2009 6:09:20 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Borges

No, I mean the whole terrorism bit.


20 posted on 11/10/2009 6:34:43 PM PST by eclecticEel (The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson